Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 18 - ITF ($15K) - Akko, Israel Hard


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18103
Date:
Week 18 - ITF ($15K) - Akko, Israel Hard


R1: DEIGMAN, Laura (GBR) 987 v RABINOWITZ, Mia (USA) Q UNR =CH 18yo JCH=1603 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18103
Date:

Updated ranking:-
R1: DEIGMAN, Laura (GBR) 993 v RABINOWITZ, Mia (USA) Q UNR

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:

Laura going well, 5-2*

__________________
DF


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 11720
Date:

Laura lost in three 6-3 4-6 3-6 cry



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:

Oh Laura!
0 counters from 10 tries this year.
This is though only the second time she's failed to win a match at an event.
The other was the last time she was MD as of right in Wirral. Though, on that occasion, the loss was more understandable, as her opponent was ranked 500 places higher.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40911
Date:

Pity

There really has been a distinct lack of ranking points in general this year from players ranked below our current #24, Jodie.

Jodie has so far, as of her latest one, earned 11 points this year. Then our 13 ranked players below Jodie starting with joint #25 ( Laura D and Fran S ) have accumulated 8 points among them this year from just 3 players : 4 from Manisha, 2 from Fran J and 2 from Eleanor. Neither have any unranked players added or got their first points. Thus as some points drop off some players have been rising in the GB rankings without any points this year.

No doubt there will be a bit of grass season activity pointswise, but in general more really looking forward to when more of the very promising young junior blood get in there and start shaking things up. Meantime though I do hope some of the existing crew can find upturns.



__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4586
Date:

With the changes to the ITF circuit happening in the next year or two it's probably just as well, meaning that we won't lose that many players and those ranked outside the top 800 can perhaps play at a level more suited to their ability.

I'm actually coming round to the way of thinking that the changes are good as a tiered system makes for better competition and those good enough will come through. My hobby versus profession arguments segue nicely into this topic.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:

Laura D back for doubles action, *0-2

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:

Turned that set around, 6-4 1-0*

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:

R16: Deigman/Riley (GBR/USA) [3] 1423 defeated Arol Wiegand/James (ISR/USA) 2308 6-4 6-1
QF: Deigman/Riley (GBR/USA) [3] 1423 v. Ohana/Rabinowitz (ISR/USA) UNR

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

Bah!
I was hoping Ms. Deigman might get some slight diversion from her singles slump in the doubles this week, as the draw looked reasonable - even, that is, within the constraints of the vagaries of $15K doubles (which some correspondents routinely deride).
But, the team lost their QF, 3 & 5.

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17416
Date:

It is only derided as some of the teams don't always take it seriously.
Lack of prize money and players ready to travel to the next event are some of the reasons why they don't always give 100%

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard