Nadal fair enough, but I'm sick of all these Spanish players, that just vulture events and end up with top 20 rankings. David Ferrer was an early proponent of this, where he would win 4 or 5 atp 250s a year, not because he was good, but because he entered 30+ atp 250s every year. BUT ALBERT ROMAS IS ANOTHER LEVEL!
ALBERT ROMAS VINOLAS: NON COUNTABLE SCORES! AS FOLLOWS:
Vienna QF 90 Marrakech QF 45 Buenos Aires QF Chennai QF 45 Moscow QF 45 Gstaad QF 45 Istanbul QF 45 Geneva R16 20
I mean imagine, making the QF, of 7 ATP tounrs, but being told, non of these scores count! This guy needs some talking too, maybe if he sorted his schedule out, he might actually win something rather than being a QF specialist.
-- Edited by Vandenburg on Thursday 27th of April 2017 09:04:39 PM
-- Edited by Vandenburg on Thursday 27th of April 2017 09:16:56 PM
Strongly agree with both. I've produced a list of horrid over-ranked players who cheapened themselves and their nations by playing a pathetic quantity of risible tournaments.
If they were football teams they'd have been playing in the cranberry sauce leagues, but as it is they ended up being "world class" tennis players.
Rainer Schuettler
Fernando Vicente
Albert Montanes
Kenny de Schepper
Nikolay Davydenko (although it mitigation he could ball a bit)
Lars Burgsmuller
Anthony Dupuis
Bjorn Phau
Bohdan Ulihrach
Andrea Gaudenzi
Marcelo Fillipini
Sargis Sargsian
It's a ruddy disgrace those pro tennis players entering all these pro tournaments. They trying to earn money or like playing tennis tournaments or some other shameful excuse?
Strongly agree with both. I've produced a list of horrid over-ranked players who cheapened themselves and their nations by playing a pathetic quantity of risible tournaments.
If they were football teams they'd have been playing in the cranberry sauce leagues, but as it is they ended up being "world class" tennis players.
Rainer Schuettler Fernando Vicente Albert Montanes Kenny de Schepper Nikolay Davydenko (although it mitigation he could ball a bit) Lars Burgsmuller Anthony Dupuis Bjorn Phau Bohdan Ulihrach Andrea Gaudenzi Marcelo Fillipini Sargis Sargsian
With all due respect to your list, Davydenko won the Tour Finals, pretty decent company in that winner's enclosure...
Davydenko won not only the Tour finals but also three Masters Series, was ranked third in the world (and top ten for five consecutive years), was part of a Davis-Cup-winning team, and had the misfortune to lose to a peaking Roger Federer in the SF of several Slams. Can't say he was a player I particularly warmed to, but hard to argue he wasn't world class.
More broadly, if you have a ranking in the top 20 or top 30 in the world and you're not world class, what does it take? I would see being on the Main Tour as being world class: there are fewer people who can enter MDs of ATP 250s by right than there are players in the Premier League alone.
-- Edited by Spectator on Friday 28th of April 2017 04:28:57 AM
Got to warm to Davydenko towards the end of his career. Always felt sorry for him - rarely scheduled on top show courts, considered boring, but Fed himself has said that had he been pushed to outside courts, he probably wouldn't have had the success he achieved.
Couldn't disagree more. At the lower futures level yes you can "blag" your way up the rankings by travelling to the slums of the earth, but anything from 250 above is much much tougher. They didn't just get to those rankings by fluke, they had been consistent through a years worth of tennis. If they were picking up tour level tournament wins and exceeding their ranking potential i would call it clever planning. I just dont agree with saying people are over ranked, they obviously aren't as they wouldn't be ranked there in the first place
Wouldn't racking up several non-counting ATP 250 QF's be justification that you are world class and consistent at main tour level as opposed to having a 'lucky' tournament where you accrue a large one-off counter that would inflate a ranking?
Couldn't disagree more. At the lower futures level yes you can "blag" your way up the rankings by travelling to the slums of the earth, but anything from 250 above is much much tougher. They didn't just get to those rankings by fluke, they had been consistent through a years worth of tennis. If they were picking up tour level tournament wins and exceeding their ranking potential i would call it clever planning. I just dont agree with saying people are over ranked, they obviously aren't as they wouldn't be ranked there in the first place
Missing the point, I agree with you, at futures and challengers you can play them in god awful places where the top seed is 300 and mop up. Of course 250s are not easy, never said that, but the more to the point, is when people enter one every week like this chap.
This ties in with the over all problem facing tennis in the last decade, it has become a sport about 80% fitness, 20% talent. Having the fitness to be able to play 52 x 250s a year.
These god awful slow courts have not helped either (which is why the AO was speeded up this year). The faster the court, the more a person's technique is exposed, they have less timing. Fast courts favour natural talent and touch over stamina.
Purely about speed, as Andy has said, it's more about the balls chosen and not the courts, which is something that has changed hugely but which is a lot less visible.
Davydenko was very clear in his objectives and his training - he said once in an interview that it was the money that motivated him and so, by playing tournaments instead of training, or by using tournaments effectively as training, he 'trained' a lot better because he had the dollar sign there dangling in front of him. Which, in turn, made him a better player and able to earn more.