Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Weeks 3 & 4 - Australian Open - doubles


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58090
Date:
Weeks 3 & 4 - Australian Open - doubles


L64:  (WC) Luke Saville & Jordan Thompson (AUS/AUS) CR 242 (144+98) vs (16) Dom Inglot & Florin Mergea (ROU) CR 70 (43+27)

L64:  Dan Evans & Nick Kyrgios (AUS) CR 507 (277+230) vs Dusan Lajovic & Victor Troicki (SRB/SRB) CR 299 (208+91)

L64:  Sam Querrey & Donald Young (USA/USA) CR 255 (85+170) vs (2) Jamie Murray & Bruno Soares (BRA) CR 7 (4+3)

The top seeds are PHH & Mahut.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41010
Date:

Just the cool head needed to guide Evo along. I heard it was him calming Nick down when they last partnered each other

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19401
Date:

Did the Skupskis not make it ? I think someone said they were first Alt. Much as I love seeing Evo do well, it kills me to see Evo/Kygrios (and other pairings like that) playing doubles and Ken/Neal missing out.

I know this is a perennial argument, but doubles should be for doubles players and based SOLELY on doubles rankings.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41010
Date:

Bob in Spain wrote:

Did the Skupskis not make it ? I think someone said they were first Alt. Much as I love seeing Evo do well, it kills me to see Evo/Kygrios (and other pairings like that) playing doubles and Ken/Neal missing out.

I know this is a perennial argument, but doubles should be for doubles players and based SOLELY on doubles rankings.


 Nope, certainly no Skupskis in the draw  



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58090
Date:

indiana wrote:
Bob in Spain wrote:

Did the Skupskis not make it ? I think someone said they were first Alt. Much as I love seeing Evo do well, it kills me to see Evo/Kygrios (and other pairings like that) playing doubles and Ken/Neal missing out.

I know this is a perennial argument, but doubles should be for doubles players and based SOLELY on doubles rankings.


 Nope, certainly no Skupskis in the draw  


furious  that one of the other doubles teams drops out before the competition gets under way.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17431
Date:

They are there - practising....

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5134
Date:

I completely understand Bobs sentiment (although I disagree) and support for the Skupskis, I too would be delighted should they squeeze in by rank.

The best dedicated doubles teams get in but will be playing to half filled stadia/ outside courts, often n late into the evening in a lesser tournament ticking on in the background. The majority of teams consist of failed singles players, having a few successful singles scratch teams gives them an opportunity to knock them out and show their mastery of their chosen form of the game. Evo/kyg is just the sort of doubles team I want to see it is explosive, exciting and will draw a crowd some of whom will come away with a passion for another form of tennis.

More importantly it is an opportunity for top players to meet, form relationships with each other and enjoy playing on the same side of the court. Specifically here it is an opportunity for Evo to mentor Nick, not that I know any players well (and I know Bob does). My limited first hand knowledge suggests Evo's misunderstood (and until recently underachieving) persona masks the reality of a player with a generic inner passion for sport and a clear understanding of his and others strengths and weaknesses who generally looks after his mates, be they; roofers, non league football managers or tennis professionals.

For Nick playing with an experienced pro who has had a few self inflicted bumps and bruises compliments of the media will do him no halm and generally for tennis given his talent that's not a bad thing.



-- Edited by Oakland2002 on Monday 16th of January 2017 09:19:42 AM



-- Edited by Oakland2002 on Monday 16th of January 2017 09:20:45 AM

__________________


ATP qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2706
Date:

I too hope the Skupskis squeeze in, but I wouldn't like to see dubs competitions reserved solely for dubs only players.  As Oakland says, Kyrios/Evo will certainly draw a crowd and that's got to be good for dubs overall.  I love watching dubs but feel on the professional level that it has become a tour of a very few specialists and that IMO is to its detriment.  I think it's great when good quality singles players crash the party and liven things up!



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

I'm somewhat in sympathy with Bob on this. I don't mind when people who are singles and serious doubles players play. So that might be a pairing like Herbert/Mahut, Benneteau/Chardy, Dodig/Granollers or Fognini/Verdasco. Or it might be one of the singles players who often play and take doubles seriously, eg Johnson, Sock and Querrey, playing with someone else. But at a Grand Slam, which is responsible for so much of the doubles players' income, I do feel it's a bit unfair for people who are doing it as a bit extra on the side, so to speak, to take a place that could go to someone for whom it might mean another year on tour. Even if, like Kyrgios/Evans, they're an organiser's dream.

__________________


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 154
Date:


Skupski Brothers
@SkupskiBros

Ken and Neal are into the @AustralianOpen main draw and will face Cabal/Farah



If they do happen to win that then they could face Daniel Evans (GBR)/Nick Kyrgios (AUS) in round 2

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19401
Date:

Really pleased for Ken/Neal although they have a tough draw.

My point above stands regardless of the personalities involved. I guess it depends on whether the philosophy is let those who earned the right to play, actually play, or get the big names on court as often as possible for the fans.

For me, this is a slam and those who have earned the right through their performances throughout the year, should be allowed to play. Let's be honest, the main reason that people like Evo and Kyrgios are playing is to earn a few extra pounds/dollars and they have no real ambition in the doubles arena. Having said that, the rules allow them to enter and so I don't blame them in any way for taking advantage of that. I just think the rules are wrong.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58090
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

L64:  (WC) Luke Saville & Jordan Thompson (AUS/AUS) CR 242 (144+98) vs (16) Dom Inglot & Florin Mergea (ROU) CR 70 (43+27)

L64:  Dan Evans & Nick Kyrgios (AUS) CR 507 (277+230) vs Dusan Lajovic & Victor Troicki (SRB/SRB) CR 299 (208+91)

L64:  Sam Querrey & Donald Young (USA/USA) CR 255 (85+170) vs (2) Jamie Murray & Bruno Soares (BRA) CR 7 (4+3)


L64:  (ALT) Ken Skupski & Neal Skupski CR 167 (76+91) vs (14) Juan Sebastián Cabal & Robert Farah (COL/COL) CR 58 (29+29)

That is a horrible draw, but I suppose they're just pleased to have the chance to play.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41010
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:

L64:  (WC) Luke Saville & Jordan Thompson (AUS/AUS) CR 242 (144+98) vs (16) Dom Inglot & Florin Mergea (ROU) CR 70 (43+27)

L64:  Dan Evans & Nick Kyrgios (AUS) CR 507 (277+230) vs Dusan Lajovic & Victor Troicki (SRB/SRB) CR 299 (208+91)

L64:  Sam Querrey & Donald Young (USA/USA) CR 255 (85+170) vs (2) Jamie Murray & Bruno Soares (BRA) CR 7 (4+3)


L64:  (ALT) Ken Skupski & Neal Skupski CR 167 (76+91) vs (14) Juan Sebastián Cabal & Robert Farah (COL/COL) CR 58 (29+29)

That is a horrible draw, but I suppose they're just pleased to have the chance to play.


 

Yes, much better than being down there and not in the draw at all. All the best to them.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41010
Date:

Bob in Spain wrote:

Really pleased for Ken/Neal although they have a tough draw.

My point above stands regardless of the personalities involved. I guess it depends on whether the philosophy is let those who earned the right to play, actually play, or get the big names on court as often as possible for the fans.

For me, this is a slam and those who have earned the right through their performances throughout the year, should be allowed to play. Let's be honest, the main reason that people like Evo and Kyrgios are playing is to earn a few extra pounds/dollars and they have no real ambition in the doubles arena. Having said that, the rules allow them to enter and so I don't blame them in any way for taking advantage of that. I just think the rules are wrong.


 

Application in the post to join the No Slam MD WCs Club ( at least if not open contested ones ). 



-- Edited by indiana on Tuesday 17th of January 2017 09:35:26 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17431
Date:

So Ken and Neal have not had a warm up match this year, but play Aus Open.

I'm pretty sure money is the driver here. If I remember correctly there is a travel allowance and really good prize money for turning up and better money for winning.

I hope they win a round or two they deserve it.

__________________
1 2 35  >  Last»  | Page of 5  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard