Evans has a career high of 53, and according to live rankings, hes up to 55 at the moment. If he wins his SF hell be up to 51 and 47 if he wins the tournament, 1 behind Edmunds.
"I just had to hang in there," world number 67 Evans said.
"I knew I'd have to do a lot of running. I had to try to force my game on him, come forward and I did that in the end pretty well."
Sounds like he started to come to the net and shorten rallies at some point in the second set I assume. In the first he was certainly staying behind the baseline returning backhand slice returns to Thiem mostly, from what I see. Wouldn't come forward.
Anyway, over the moon for the guy, well done Dan, hard work now paying off in spades.
TBH he didn't get much chance to come into the net in the first set as Thiem played a blinder, but then seemed to take his foot off the gas a bit once that first set was under his belt. I also think the long close match he played yesterday came into play as the match went on and he found himself in a battle he did not expect. But respect to Dan, he stayed focussed, defended really well and made Thiem generate a lot of his own pace probably exacerbating any tiredness on that side of the net.
No I disagree, Dan played the perfect game given the circumstances. His length, even in defence was superb. When Thiem tried to outlast him, Dan was more consistent varying pace and spin to induce errors.
A more consistent first serve and Dan would have wrapped up the second set much quicker. A throughly enjoyable performance. Playing this way Dan on his day and with a bit of luck is a threat to all but Fed, Andy and Novak. The harder he works the luckier he will get.
-- Edited by Oakland2002 on Thursday 12th of January 2017 09:52:26 PM
Agree with Oakland, I only saw the first set before I had to go to work but I'm sure Dan did really well to turn it round so let's give credit where it's due.
I didn't see Dan's match so I can't say aye or nae to anything here.
But I would say that whilst players such as Dan and Kyle, indeed Andy and Jo too and often others often absolutely rightly get huge praise I personally am well prepared to admit or discuss if and when they get lucky breaks to some extent through say injury effected opponents or self distructing or form collapsing from opponents. It can give a fuller picture, there always being other players across the net.
I watched the second and third sets, so can't comment on the 1st. Hilts appears to be working on maintaining Dan's focus, indeed at one point indicated to Dan to control his frustrations. Having seen Dan play a couple of times live, but not for 18 months or so, Dan's affect is now much calmer, previously he had been wired.
His fitness and mobility, the later always good unless restricted by injury have also improved allowing him to be consistent for longer. He doesn't have Thiem's explosive power but he has a much better understanding of his own game, it's strengths and weaknesses. Even 6 months ago he wouldn't have got close to winning and compared to this time last year, when Kyle took him apart in the Dallas Challenger final, today's performance was a different league.
I really liked Dan's attitude when he won through to play Fed at Wimbledon, it was respectful but he was determined to be professional rather than treat it as "my big day on centre court" in the entirely understandable way Marcus had done. It was I am a professional tennis player, I am going to have my game plan and play to it. He has now got to a level where he can act on that philosophy as he did today. Part of how any opponent plays is dependant on how you play him.
-- Edited by Oakland2002 on Friday 13th of January 2017 07:05:05 AM
Yes I agree, he is more calm but still a little impulsive/agitated/spikey but this is his nature it seems. Certainly maturing with improved focus. I also noticed Hilton's gaze, fixed like the eye of Sauron on Evo, unmoving and intense.
Evo played well but Thiem had a shocker in the last set. Kuznetsov seems to be another clay courter so Dan again has another good chance to progress.