Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 46 - Kuwait F3 ($10,000) - Meshref (hard)


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58284
Date:
RE: Week 46 - Kuwait F3 ($10,000) - Meshref (hard)


QF:  (4) Marcus Willis WR 503 defeated (PR) Abdullah Maqdes (KUW) WR 1765 by 3 & 1

*****

SF:  (1) David Pérez (ESP) WR 308 (CH = 216 in June) vs (4) Marcus Willis WR 503



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58284
Date:

SF:  (4) Daniel Altmaier (GER) & Marcus Willis CR 2976 (708+1268) defeated (1) Jordi Muñoz & David Pérez (ESP/ESP) CR 459 (291+168) by 5 & 3  biggrin

*****

Final:  (4) Daniel Altmaier (GER) & Marcus Willis CR 2976 (708+1268) vs (2) Roy Sarut de Valk & Ronan Joncour (NED/FRA) CR 1127 (581+546)

Marcus is having a good week! smile



__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1847
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

Marcus is having a good week! smile


 Marcus is having a good YEAR!



__________________
DF


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 11769
Date:

Marcus wins 6-3 6-3    smile

Back on for the doubles final later



__________________


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 117
Date:

I note he "did an Evo" and got broken while serving for the match... quickly made amends by breaking to win in the next game though!

__________________


Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 364
Date:

Marcus will play his doubles partner in the singles final

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6109
Date:

DF wrote:

Marcus wins 6-3 6-3    smile

Back on for the doubles final later


 that feels like a good win for Marcus in his first serious event back. Beating a guy just outside top 300 and quite easily suggests Marcus should be capable of moving back up the rankings and into the top 300 himself in the next few months, presumably he has very little to defend over the next period?  



__________________
JonH


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58284
Date:

SF:  (4) Marcus Willis WR 503 defeated (1) David Pérez (ESP) WR 308 by 3 & 3  ban-woohoo.gif

*****

Final:  (4) Marcus Willis WR 503 vs (3) Daniel Altmaier (GER) WR 476 (= CH)



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 23652
Date:

It appears that Marcus has 2 points to defend in January, and 70 from Wimbledon - nothing else at all, so he should be able to make a fair bit of progress. This week alone will give him a jump of around 40 places, more if he wins the final

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19402
Date:

This was probably the first real test for Marcus. Perez Sanz is a decent player at this level as his ranking suggests and I remember he gave Kyle a good match a couple of years back in Spain. Marcus though has passed this test with flying colours which is great to see. At least those who paid appearance money for Marcus (if that is what happened) have got their money's worth.

Hoping Marcus can complete the double and win both titles this week.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6109
Date:

the addict wrote:

It appears that Marcus has 2 points to defend in January, and 70 from Wimbledon - nothing else at all, so he should be able to make a fair bit of progress. This week alone will give him a jump of around 40 places, more if he wins the final


 well, that is promising. Maybe he can make ranking head way and some more appearance money on the side!!



__________________
JonH


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2417
Date:

Well lets face it he should be winning futures titles. Lets see if he goes and gets a few wins under his belt before a crack at challengers in March time before the clay season starts...

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6109
Date:

Jaffa wrote:

Well lets face it he should be winning futures titles. Lets see if he goes and gets a few wins under his belt before a crack at challengers in March time before the clay season starts...


 Hi Jaffa, I am sure you are right, he should move much higher than 500+ and win these types of events. But after effectively no competition in 12 months (Wimbledon aside and whooping it up in Vienna) at least he is back and winning. It would be good if someone else can bridge the big gap we have between the half dozen or so players in the 200-350 range and then a big gap down to the next batch, we need a few more battling to try and make top 200 again. 



__________________
JonH


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2417
Date:

JonH wrote:
Jaffa wrote:

Well lets face it he should be winning futures titles. Lets see if he goes and gets a few wins under his belt before a crack at challengers in March time before the clay season starts...


 Hi Jaffa, I am sure you are right, he should move much higher than 500+ and win these types of events. But after effectively no competition in 12 months (Wimbledon aside and whooping it up in Vienna) at least he is back and winning. It would be good if someone else can bridge the big gap we have between the half dozen or so players in the 200-350 range and then a big gap down to the next batch, we need a few more battling to try and make top 200 again. 


 Hi John, I completely agree with you. It was a good bit of scheduling from Marcus to play here to be fair regardless of whether he got appearance money. Very much looking forward to following Marcus' progress over the next 12 months. It will be very interesting to see how far he can ride the crest of the wave, so to speak.

David and Marcus are absolutely walking the doubles final as I write.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58284
Date:

Marcus & Daniel s! biggrin  One half of the double complete for Marcus.  biggrin

Final:  (4) Daniel Altmaier (GER) & Marcus Willis CR 2976 (708+1268) defeated (2) Roy Sarut de Valk & Ronan Joncour (NED/FRA) CR 1127 (581+546) by 1 & 1

Easy peasy! smile



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4  >  Last»  | Page of 4  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard