But a great match up for Cam, sounds like it will be close but there is a massive drop off in the depth of college tennis and although they are only months apart in age their relative success and experience in professional tennis is very different. Tom will play 4 years in college.
Hopefully not being complacent but Cam finds himself in an interesting group vieing for that semifinal slot all having chosen different routes into a pro tennis career, if he wins he faces Novikov or Paul, Novikov dropped out of UCLA at the end of his sophomore year to go for, Paul turned pro without considering college. Both strong juniors making different choices.
Then if he gets through that Sandgren apart he faces a group of hardened pros approaching there mid 20's having already ground it on tour for a good 6-7 yrs in Bemelmans case longer.
Not surprised by the doubles result: Bemelmans can be a very good doubles player. Bemelmans and de Loore beat Melo and Soares in DC in Brazil during the WG playoffs recently.
It's interesting isn't it, there is a process of natural selection for those who are good enough to play singles regularly at challenger level for sometime but struggle to make top 100 consistently in the first half of their career. Due to the financial pressures of being on tour they get to play a lot of doubles to try and make ends meet, if they get some results they continue and get better.
Would be great if Brydan could get through this one. Plenty of young talent in his section but both seeds are out, could be an opportunity to go a bit deeper.
Good win for Brydan, the question is did he play dirty and whip out a snickers bar and sup some cola at the end of the first set, as we know Tennys can collapse in the face of such psychological torture.
Cam too strong for Tom now faces a very interesting match up with Tommy Paul. Looking forward to it . Hopefully Cam will have too much for him although Tommy obviously progressing well, now an established teenage challenger player,
He broke top 200 as an 18 year old so if British we would be waxing lyrical but under less pressure because of the sheer volume of high quality 18-20 year old prospects they have in the U.S. For general comparison Kyle managed it in his final months as a teenager, although from his scheduling it wasn't seen as a priority.
I will be interested to see what plans Cam has for the future. We assume he is missing a semester to test the water.
Should he turn pro? He definitely has the talent. It is whether he wants that security of a degree in case things don't work out and whether there is any finance/backing from the LTA if he does go pro.
A little while ago I posted a link to a local newspaper to TCU (and now can't find) in which it stated Cam was taking a semester off to concentrate on pro tennis and see if he could pick up enough points to qualify for the Aussie Open. Depending on how he did he would then consider whether to stay at college (which he said he loves) or to leave early. His coach was quoted as saying they would support him either way as they saw their program as a stepping stone to professional tennis.
Quite a few athletes who leave a year or 2 early, go back to their alma mater and finish their degrees after their sporting careers. I don't know if this is at their own expense or whether there is some arrangement whereby they can do this on some sort of continuing scholarship. Best of both worlds if he could do this!
Strikes me that Cam is doing exactly the right thing as are the coaching team at TCU, a win win for all concerned. Cam obviously wants to be an elite player on the ATP tour and has found the right environment to put himself in a good position to make a really good stab at it whilst also mitigating the risk.
Unless his degree is vocational (which his scholarship is!) I don't think too many employers will look too harshly on the fact that he quit to play a significantly higher standard of tennis. More power to his elbow (and pencil if applicable)
Bemelmans ranking this week for doubles as per the ATP seems to be 299. But it's immaterial, as he's way better than his ranking anyway - only played less than a dozen tournaments in the past year.
Bemelmans ranking this week for doubles as per the ATP seems to be 299. But it's immaterial, as he's way better than his ranking anyway - only played less than a dozen tournaments in the past year.
Sorry. Forgot to update the rankings. Oversight now rectified.