No match at the truely elite (test/slam) level and that is how I see DC, a series of international team test matches, should be settled in a 5th set tie break. The gladiators should fight to the death.
I have absolutely no problem with some of the top players not playing, these are the guys who play deep into the second week of slams. Being realistic virtually all the top guys like playing but sorry Fed, Warinka, Rafa and Andy have very good reasons for not playing, it's called self preservation. We are left despite this with a fabulous festival of tennis. It generally grows the game.
This fixture is fascinating. DC tennis and the opportunities and challenges it has given our players both now and in the past are immense. Dan has had the occasional historical wobble but generally the DC has been a very positive experience for him, sustaining his growth of court and on. As a big fan it is a joy to see him realising his potential and he has an opportunity to lead. I feel he is imensely passionate about being a British tennis player and has a massive role to play in British tennis in the future, great to see. Growing the game is more than just developing the juniors who can afford to play it. I just hope the park courts in Hall Green are resurfaced in honour of yesterday's victory.
Kyle similarly has benefited immensely from DC, from (although some never see the point of) hitting with the team as a teen while still predominately playing futures, to now as a top 50 player, fully initiated and embedded in the fabric of DC tennis and increasingly playing more of a role. This tie is a challenge for him, the conditions couldn't be worse, set up for the home team. Would he fly half the way round the world to play such a tournament if playing singles, no. Although not histrionic (a good thing) he is clearly out of his comfort zone, his nation needs him, he is there, another opportunity to develop. Cam developmentally is now probably where Kyle was eighteen months ago, definitely our next best prospect of a top 100 player, now getting a chance to sample how he needs to prepare week in week out to get there.
DC is for the 12 months a year tennis fan/ tennis playing fan who actually appreciates that there is some depth to the professional game, it's format is by no mans perfect for everyone, but I love it (particularly when it suits us). It is the only competition that gives the whole professional game an opportunity to show case itself in multiple venues simultaneously around the world. Depth is essential, look at championship football it is a wonderfully vibrant, heavily supported, helter skelter weekly football feast bereft of stars. My advice is to stop fretting sit back and enjoy!
-- Edited by Oakland2002 on Saturday 4th of February 2017 07:51:50 PM
All to play for now - all 3 remaining matches could go either way, particularly if Kyle doesnt improve.
Doubles, I favour Canada, but only 60-40, Jamie and Dom (with Dom's serve working) have a shout but Canadians are probably favourites.
Dan should be able to beat Pospisil on a fast court, and if Pospisil is injured, Dan will beat Polansky. But again Dan v Pospisil is probably a 60-40 call on this court.
So likely to be down to Kyle last rubber out - with the way Kyle played yesterday, I wouldnt be confident, but he should be able to edge it.
All 3 rubbers feel like 60-40 one way or another to me!
Thanks, Oakland, for putting so many things I feel better than I could! Pity about Mr Edmund's match - but no real shock (except perhaps in the comprehensive nature of the loss). An interesting tie from this point onwards.
I don't mean to put a curse on my favourite player, but I make Dam a heavy favourite against Pospisil. I remember watching their match in Vanouver in 2013, though that is so long ago that it will have no bearing on this weekend. If VP really is carrying an injury, Dan will expoit it. We know that VK is an excellent doubles player when he puts his mind to it. So, for me the crunch match is Kyle v. Shapovalov. Should be an interesting match, I wonder what the odds are.... Have a great w/e all!
There's what looks (haven't read it yet) like an interesting interview with Dan in today's Times under the heading 'I let a lot of people down. I'm trying to repay them'; sub-heading: Dan Evans tells Stuart Fraser, in Ottawa, that his wild nights and no-shows are in the past after a remarkable rise up the rankings and an impressive Australian Open.
For the record, it is an interesting interview. He definitely had a "road to Damascus" moment in about May 2015 (when he was a no-show for a Futures event in the Wirral).
A bit from today's coverage of the tie:
Edmund, ranked No 47, would have fancied his chances of doubling Britain's lead, but he made too many errors against Pospisil, who admittedly is a far better player than his current ranking suggests. Edmund was brutally honest in his post-match assessment.
"My performance was just not good enough really - pretty dismal by my standards," Edmund said. "It needs to be a lot better, to be honest, at this level. It's disappointing when fans travel and spend money to put in a performance like that."
Ah, real pity for Kyle. We can discuss and criticise and we do, but Kyle hardly wanted to play poorly, so much the reverse. As said brutally honest, no resort there to such as the court speed or not generally being at the top of his form, when he knows he should still have done much better, and a sense of what must have been feelings of deep exasperation with how things unfolded, feelings that for good or bad are so self contained within his matches.
Yes, thank you, SC. I must say that while I'm thrilled for Stuart Fraser that he has such a good job, I don't generally buy Murdoch papers, in print or online, so I'm really missing seeing his journalism! My choice, my loss. But it was good to read Kyle Edmund's assessment.
Yes, thank you, SC. I must say that while I'm thrilled for Stuart Fraser that he has such a good job, I don't generally buy Murdoch papers, in print or online, so I'm really missing seeing his journalism! My choice, my loss. But it was good to read Kyle Edmund's assessment.
I sympathise, Spectator, & I wouldn't touch The Sun with the proverbial barge pole, but there's no way I'd buy The Grauniad instead. I did experiment for a while with The Indy, but reading The Times had by that time become too much of an ingrained habit, so I eventually reverted. That said, my original broadband provider was O2, which was bought out three or four years ago by Sky, which did not best please me. I eventually realised that I was being charged by Sky for services (e.g. landline, which at the time was with BT) I wasn't using because I chose not to use them (can't remember the excuse that was trotted when I challenged the practice). I managed to extricate myself from its clutches a couple of years ago. None of the people I spoke to on the telephone during my efforts to end the "relationship" could understand my distaste for putting more money in Murdoch's pockets by continuing to subscribe to Sky Broadband (or buying The Times!), any more than pushy Sky TV salesmen can when I'm approached about buying a subscription & I tell them where to stuff it & why!
Stu Fraser is a relatively recent recruit. Seems to have taken over from Barry Flatman, who appeared to step into the breach as chief tennis writer after Neil Harman admitted to plagiarism two or three years ago & left under a bit of a cloud...
Anyone who refers to a commercial transaction in which they are trying to get you to pay for something you aren't using as a 'relationship' is asking for trouble!
Yes, I think it was end of last year that Stu Fraser mentioned he'd got the job. It was lovely seeing (on Twitter) the number of people from around the world who wished him well - he's obviously earned a lot of respect along the way. He's one of the people I always look at on Twitter - manages to be both sensible and interesting ... and seems like a decent person.
In re: Kyle Edmund's assessment, I think one of the things that always really strikes me about his comments is that he has so clear a sense of the wider picture. It's not just about "I didn't do well. I'm disappointed in myself." He has a real sense of obligation to those around him, including the fans. A good sort.
Herbert & Mahut follow Gasquet and Simon in winning in straight sets vs Nishikori-less Japan.
So if GB beat Canada it's across the channel we go for the QF.
Indeed. And into the lion's den. Their team has not forgotten "that" tie. To quote Nicolas Mahut: "I've played my five matches away. Great Britain would give us the opportunity to play in France, two years after a defeat at Queens which I have not forgotten. It's on the podium of my worst memories. That frustration, that disappointment are still present." http://www.leparisien.fr/sports/tennis-coupe-davis-mahut-a-coeur-d-aller-au-bout-04-02-2017-6654633.php#xtor=AD-1481423553 He's a little less excited about the possibility of Canada.
That was an amazing tie ...
-- Edited by Spectator on Saturday 4th of February 2017 04:37:31 PM
In re: Kyle Edmund's assessment, I think one of the things that always really strikes me about his comments is that he has so clear a sense of the wider picture. It's not just about "I didn't do well. I'm disappointed in myself." He has a real sense of obligation to those around him, including the fans. A good sort.
I sometimes feel that maybe he is too much of a good sort in this regard. While obviously it is to his credit that he feels an obligation to others that can create additional pressure on a player that he might be better off without. The Davis Cup is a funny beast for players as it so different to every other tournament they play. Some players thrive in that atmosphere while others find it a terrible burden. It is far too early in Kyle's career to say how things will go but I get the feeling that he his much more comfortable quietly going about his own thing on tour than he is playing in the Davis Cup environment.