Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 35 - US Open Main Draw Hard


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18104
Date:
Week 35 - US Open Main Draw Hard


R1: WATSON, Heather (GBR) 75 v Qualifier

R1: BROADY, Naomi (GBR) 83 v Qualifier

R1: KONTA, Johanna (GBR) 13 14 v MATTEK-SANDS, Bethanie (USA) WC 109 CH=30 2011



-- Edited by Peter too on Friday 26th of August 2016 04:55:30 PM

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6982
Date:

I still have to almost 'rub my eyes' when I see we have a (GBR) 13 !!!! So exciting .

__________________


ATP qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2847
Date:

Whenever  I see Bethanie Mattek-Sands play she always looks like a dangerous opponent but her ranking never reflects that. Maybe she is a player who performs well on the big stage and then is quietly ineffective for the rest of the year. Though she only has 7 wins in singles all year, I expect Jo will be given a tough match.

Heather continues to get lucky with Grand Slam draws and it's about time she took advantage, though I feel she might have a bit of a mental barrier regarding the US Open having still failed to get a win. A Grand Slam win would here would be big for Naomi too and would be a potential turning point for both Heather and Naomi.



-- Edited by tony_orient on Friday 26th of August 2016 06:39:23 PM

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:

tony_orient wrote:

[Whenever] I see Bethanie Mattek-Sands play she always looks like a dangerous opponent [...] though she only has 7 wins in singles all year, I expect Jo will be given a tough match.


WTA's draw analysis is of the opinion that Jo's match is one of the top 5 potential matches for an upset.



__________________


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 527
Date:

Ellen Perez? - these wildcards are getting stupid now



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:

brendan wrote:

Ellen Perez? - these wildcards are getting stupid now


The USTA & Tennis Australia have a reciprocal arrangement where each Association gets one Main Draw WC in the others Grand Slam.
Tennis Australia held an Australian Playoff, in Florida last week, to determine their recipient, which Ms. Perez won (James Duckworth won the men's WC) and that is how she got her WC.

I am strongly opposed to the arrangements in place between the other three Slams of this nature.



__________________


Masters Series Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 3790
Date:

If Laura qualifies. What price on Hev vs Laura 1st round LOL

__________________

Good luck Team GBR in 2016!!!



Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 527
Date:

AliBlahBlah wrote:
brendan wrote:

Ellen Perez? - these wildcards are getting stupid now


The USTA & Tennis Australia have a reciprocal arrangement where each Association gets one Main Draw WC in the others Grand Slam.
Tennis Australia held an Australian Playoff, in Florida last week, to determine their recipient, which Ms. Perez won (James Duckworth won the men's WC) and that is how she got her WC.

I am strongly opposed to the arrangements in place between the other three Slams of this nature.


 me too - there should be more merit for a main draw entry than just winning a few matches in  a domestic competition - she shouldn't have got anything more than an entry into the qualifiers as ours did at Wimbledon - Australia doesn't have enough depth to justify maintaining such an arrangement



-- Edited by brendan on Friday 26th of August 2016 08:10:17 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 40932
Date:

You know there is a way of ending debates / arguments about who gets Slam MD WCs apart from some thinking that it would be a good arrangement in itself

I know though that this way would not be liked by many.



-- Edited by indiana on Friday 26th of August 2016 08:24:31 PM

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4033
Date:

Please, not the WC discussion again.

__________________

Face your fears........Live your dreams!



Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2417
Date:

Agree with the above. There is a thread for that somewhere.

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2417
Date:

Laura gets Naomi

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 23397
Date:

Watson-Hogenkamp

__________________


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9477
Date:

Hev can't really ask for a better draw, just got to do the biz now.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18104
Date:

R1: WATSON, Heather (GBR) 75 v HOGENKAMP, Richel (NED) 165 CH=115 13/7/15
R1: BROADY, Naomi (GBR) 83 v ROBSON, Laura (GBR) Q 247
R1:KONTA, Johanna (GBR) 13 14 v MATTEK-SANDS, Bethanie (USA) WC 109 CH=30 2011

__________________
1 2 327  >  Last»  | Page of 27  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard