Had posted over in the non-GB performances thread about Christian Harrison. Quite honestly, had I had all the surgeries he has (seven rounds) I'm not sure I'd get out of my chair on a daily basis, let alone continue as a professional athlete. I hope that this is the start of more good things for him.
Danger to me of Rosol is not just loss, but also exhaustion. Would like some very quick early rounds if possible. Rosol, X, Simon?, Dimitrov/Lopez/Coric not really what one would hope for.
Tough draws. With a 1 in 4 chance of drawing a seed, 2 out of 3 drawing seeds is really tough.
Will be great run out for Kyle but Gasquet is a supreme talent, and is getting stronger it would seem.
Evo can't complain, though there was criticism of Ram getting a WC so he will be right up for this and he's tough to break but would hope Evo could come thru that.
Rosol dangerous but expect it will be useful run out for Andy.
Disagree with the maths. When the qualifying slots were filled, there were 3 slots against seeds out of the 16 vacant, so the odds on drawing a seed were roughly 1:5
But we're talking about the GB men - they weren't qualifiers, they were MD direct entrants, so it was their odds of drawing a seed, in the original draw, given there were 32 already placed who couldn't, by definition, draw a seed.
The qualifier slots ( I am certainly assuming ) were not drawn out prior to the general main draw. So at draw time each of our non seeded players could have taken up one of the 32 slots against seeds out of the 96 available to them.
So bit unlucky for 2 out of 3 to draw seeds but no more than that with such small numbers and fairly big chances.
-- Edited by indiana on Saturday 27th of August 2016 02:14:00 PM
The qualifier slots ( I am certainly assuming ) were not drawn out prior to the general main draw. So at draw time each of our non seeded players could have taken up one of the 32 slots against seeds out of the 96 available to them.
So bit unlucky for 2 out of 3 to draw seeds but no more than that with such small numbers and fairly big chances.
-- Edited by indiana on Saturday 27th of August 2016 02:14:00 PM
True, my Maths was slightly out. But... chances of drawing a Top 16 seed was only 1 in 6 chance, we got 2/3- even worse!
Nobody commenting on Aljaz? Guess we are all thinking it's a foregone conclusion, particularly on the current form of both players. I am going to think positive and hope Ali finds the form that saw him beat Lopez, Simon and Karlovic whilst praying that Kyrgios decides that the line judge is looking at him funny and has one of his petulant meltdowns.
I expect if Andy has rested well he won't have too many problems against Rosol, or in the early rounds full stop. Likewise I like Evo's draw providing he's not having an off day himself. Zverev would be a tough R2 but hasn't done much at slam level as yet. Hard to see success for Kyle and Ali, though as above if Kygrios has a melt-down you never know, and whilst I'd expect Gasquet to have too much quality for Kyle he has nothing to lose so hopefully he can hit freely and make an impression.
Without wanting to be a Debbie Downer, Edmund's record against Top 50 players is something like 2-15 and he lost in straight sets to Mannarino and Isner (without even a tie breaker) in his last two slams so if he can take a set or two against Gasquet then I'd see that as progress.
Kyles growth has been incremental, he has consistently been the 4th or 5 th player at his age or younger in the world, others have moved around him, but his position has remained rock solid has he has got older. To progress in such a way he generally dominates a cohort and then steps up. ie futures, challengers... Implicitly he won't play top 50 players very often 15, mostly as wild cards or in DC so when completely miss matched, and playing at a lower level, so the historical record does really hold too much weight in a player in development showing continual progression.
Now really he is at ATP 250 level, where you are still talking 3 set tennis with perhaps only one or two top seeds at Gasquet's level. Could he go deep or even win a 250 with the right draw or on the right surface? Undoubtedly .
5 set tennis is a different beast, giving quality players much more chance to steady the ship and recover after a rocky start, work ones opponent out and grind them down with consistency of play, stepping it up only in the clutch. Kyle has had some great performance over 5 sets in DC winning and loosing (on clay). Yes he could take out a seed and open up a pocket in the draw for a decent run but most likely a deep run at slams at the moment will be around a decent draw and picking someone else's pocket.
Given this pattern of development he has a punchers chance against Gasquet but agree expectations should be tempered particularly as hard fast courts don't necessarily give him chance to wind up the fear hand optimally. Kyles commitment and focus on DC tennis will I think suppress his ranking this year, which is fine, he may well even be 10-15 places adrift of Evo. He is close to dominating the cohort that play mostly ATP main tour and are direct entrants to GS but drop down to challengers for the odd points top up (100-50 group) and now needs regular exposure to the next tier, Gasquet being the pinnacle.
When compared to his contemporaries he is right on track.