Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Link Back -> Andrew Murray message board -> British men discussion section -> Week 34 - Belgium F11 ($10,000) - Huy (clay)
Post Info TOPIC: Week 34 - Belgium F11 ($10,000) - Huy (clay)
Coup Droit


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55013
Date:
Week 34 - Belgium F11 ($10,000) - Huy (clay)
Permalink  

There seems to be a glitch between Bet365 (which as SC says, has Billy having won 6-0 in the second), and Livescore.

Livescore have Billy leading 5-0 and then Loic having just taken the next game, 5-1



-- Edited by Coup Droit on Tuesday 23rd of August 2016 09:49:20 AM

__________________
Stircrazy


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 57460
Date:
Permalink  

The outcome according to the ITF:

L32:  Billy Harris WR 1049 defeated (WC) Loïc Juszczak (BEL) WR 1277 by 5 & 1

Still a win! wink



__________________
Coup Droit


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55013
Date:
Permalink  

Yes, and that's all that counts

Do sometimes wonder though what the legal aspects are for Bet365 if they get the score wrong....

__________________
Jaffa


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2417
Date:
Permalink  

Coup Droit wrote:

Yes, and that's all that counts

Do sometimes wonder though what the legal aspects are for Bet365 if they get the score wrong....

 If it's a human error or a 'clear mistake' bets are void.



__________________
Bob in Spain


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19385
Date:
Permalink  

Go Billy.

__________________
Coup Droit


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55013
Date:
Permalink  

Jaffa wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:

Yes, and that's all that counts

Do sometimes wonder though what the legal aspects are for Bet365 if they get the score wrong....

 If it's a human error or a 'clear mistake' bets are void.

 

Thanks, seems fair, I suppose.

Mind you, wish my actions were 'void' whenever I made a human error....



__________________
indiana


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40596
Date:
Permalink  

Jaffa wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:

Yes, and that's all that counts

Do sometimes wonder though what the legal aspects are for Bet365 if they get the score wrong....

 If it's a human error or a 'clear mistake' bets are void.

Surely if you bet on a scoreline with Bet365 and were right you win whatever Bet365 may initially have come up with ??

Edit: I guess you were meaning that they avoid paying out to the true losers. They would be losing bets I take it rather than "void" bets -  ie Bet365 retains their stake ?



-- Edited by indiana on Tuesday 23rd of August 2016 12:53:23 PM

__________________
Jaffa


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2417
Date:
Permalink  

Not quite.

So for example you're watching a match and you know the score is 5-3 to A but Bet 365 shows the score to be 5-3 to B, you would obviously place a bet on player A, because as a result of the information being incorrect they have offered false odds.

In this situation, ALL bets would be voided and the stake refunded because at the time of the bet being placed the information was wrong.

They can prove it by looking at the momentum graph/PbP on the ITF scores

__________________
indiana


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40596
Date:
Permalink  

Jaffa wrote:

Not quite.

So for example you're watching a match and you know the score is 5-3 to A but Bet 365 shows the score to be 5-3 to B, you would obviously place a bet on player A, because as a result of the information being incorrect they have offered false odds.

In this situation, ALL bets would be voided and the stake refunded because at the time of the bet being placed the information was wrong.

They can prove it by looking at the momentum graph/PbP on the ITF scores

Thanks, yes I understand that and that makes sense.

I'm not sure all the ins and ours here, but I was just meaning a direct scoreline bet with correct Bet365 info at the time of the bet, but wrong info after the bet is struck.



__________________
Coup Droit


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55013
Date:
Permalink  

Nice one, Tom !

L32: (Q) Tom Farquharson WR 1400 def. (4) Daniel Altmaier (GER) WR 492 6-3 6-4

(Add: this needs a 'woohoo' smile)



-- Edited by Coup Droit on Tuesday 23rd of August 2016 02:02:08 PM

__________________
Stircrazy


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 57460
Date:
Permalink  

L32:  Jakob Sude (GER) WR 966 defeated (Q) Luke Oakley WR 1478 by 0-6 7-5 7-6(6)

L32:  (Q) Tom Farquharson WR 1400 defeated (4) Daniel Altmaier (GER) WR 492 by 3 & 3 - for CD's benefit:  ban-woohoo.gif

L32:  Billy Harris WR 1049 defeated (WC) Loïc Juszczak (BEL) WR 1277 by 0 & 1

****

L16:  Johann Willems (GER) WR 1100 (CH = 1097 last week) vs (Q) Tom Farquharson WR 1400

L16:  Billy Harris WR 1049 vs (2) Maxime Authom (BEL) WR 378 (CH = 143 in February 2013)



__________________
Bob in Spain


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19385
Date:
Permalink  

Well the 2nd round is sure going to test Billy's level following recovery from injury.

__________________
Coup Droit


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55013
Date:
Permalink  

Thanks for the 'woohoo', SC

Can we have a 'boohoo' for Luke ? That's so cruel.....so, so close to a useful win....

__________________
Stircrazy


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 57460
Date:
Permalink  

L16:  (2) Maxime Authom (BEL) WR 378 defeated Billy Harris WR 1049 by 2 & 1  cry



__________________
Stircrazy


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 57460
Date:
Permalink  

Coup Droit wrote:

Can we have a 'boohoo' for Luke?

Will this do:

Boo Hoo Hoo Smiley?



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5  >  Last»  | Page of 5  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
Link Back -> Andrew Murray message board -> British men discussion section -> Week 34 - Belgium F11 ($10,000) - Huy (clay)
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard