Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 32 - Olympic Tennis Competition - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil - Hard


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19401
Date:
Week 32 - Olympic Tennis Competition - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil - Hard


Stircrazy wrote:
Bob in Spain wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:
daisy wrote:

Wish the Olympic Results page made more sense:

Benoit Paire FRA bt Fabio Fognini ITA 6-4 4-6 6-7

According to them Paire was the winner but the scoreline points to Foggy on top!


It makes perfect sense.  When I look at the schedule & results page of the Olympic Tennis Event, to which there is a link on the ITF home page, there is a little green tick against Foggy's name & the mere fact that the score shows games won first indicates that Paire may have won the first set by 6-4, but that Foggy won the next two , & therefore the match, by 6-4 7-6(5).  I can't read the scoreline you quote any other way! confuse


Understand your logic perfectly SC, except for the part that says

Benoit Paire FRA bt Fabio Fognini ITA

which is in complete contradiction to everything else.


Does it?  We must be looking at different pages!  More confuse confused than ever!


I was only going from Daisy's comment and haven't had time to even look at the actual results page. Perhaps they have corrected it since Daisy posted her comments.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23460
Date:

I'm totally confused, can't see the magic word "bt" anywhere

(and could someone remind me where that list of players ages was - I can't find it again at this time of night)



-- Edited by the addict on Tuesday 9th of August 2016 10:06:04 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58087
Date:

the addict wrote:

I'm totally confused, can't see the magic word "bt" anywhere


Precisely!  Only the players' names & the set scores, which must be read according to their places in the draw. 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58087
Date:

the addict wrote:

(and could someone remind me where that list of players ages was - I can't find it again at this time of night)


Not on the ITF site for the top players, as far as I'm aware.  I always refer to their individual pages on the ATP & WTA sites, which inevitably involves a few more clicks to complete a post! wink  That said, for the player involved in the Olympic tournament, all you have to do is click on their respective names in the draw. 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23460
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:
the addict wrote:

(and could someone remind me where that list of players ages was - I can't find it again at this time of night)


Not on the ITF site for the top players, as far as I'm aware.  I always refer to their individual pages on the ATP & WTA sites, which inevitably involves a few more clicks to complete a post! wink  That said, for the player involved in the Olympic tournament, all you have to do is click on their respective names in the draw. 


 It was a list that someone posted here, with the players grouped by age. I must be getting old, can't remember who or where or when



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58087
Date:

We finally get the draw for the mixed:

R1:  Jack Sock & Bethanie Mattek-Sands (USA) CR 34 (24+10) vs Jamie Murray & Johanna Konta CR 17 (4+13)

According to Clare Balding just now, Andy & Heather are on stand-by, so to speak...



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58087
Date:

the addict wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:
the addict wrote:

(and could someone remind me where that list of players ages was - I can't find it again at this time of night)


Not on the ITF site for the top players, as far as I'm aware.  I always refer to their individual pages on the ATP & WTA sites, which inevitably involves a few more clicks to complete a post! wink  That said, for the player involved in the Olympic tournament, all you have to do is click on their respective names in the draw. 


 It was a list that someone posted here, with the players grouped by age. I must be getting old, can't remember who or where or when


This the one you mean (male players only)?



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23460
Date:

Yes, that's the one, thank you kind sir

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 13908
Date:

Unreal atmosphere in the BRA-ROU doubles right now!

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58087
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

We finally get the draw for the mixed:

R1:  Jack Sock & Bethanie Mattek-Sands (USA) CR 34 (24+10) vs Jamie Murray & Johanna Konta CR 17 (4+13)

According to Clare Balding just now, Andy & Heather are on stand-by, so to speak...


Extract from today's Times:

[...] Murray, who won silver alongside Laura Robson in 2012, yesterday confirmed that he would step aside from the mixed doubles to allow his brother, Jamie, to represent Britain with Konta [it comes after a couple of short paragraphs about Johanna's epic win over Kuznetsova ( biggrin )].

The selection of  Konta and Jamie Murray almost certainly meant Heather Watson, who was angry at being left out in favour of Robson four years ago, would miss out on playing in mixed doubles again, despite her being a current Wimbledon champion in the event.  Watson's only hope of a reprieve was that she and Andy Murray were second on a list of reserve pairs who could be placed into the draw today if there were withdrawals.  But after beating Monaco, Murray hinted he had no great desire to take on extra matches in the mixed event anyway.

The Wimbledon champion had hoped to win a doubles medal alongside his brother, for which they were seeded second, but they were beaten in the first round on Sunday.

Murray said:  "The plan was always that Jamie was going to play with Jo," said the younger Murray.  Jamie is a way more experienced doubles player than me and Jo is playing well, too, so they have a good chance of winning a medal and then there is an outside shot that me and Heather [ouch!] could get in as well.

It's been really hard to prepare here after the French Open and Wimbledon, as I have not played a match on a hard court for five months.

The defending champion is the top-ranked player in the singles after Novak Djokovic's tearful exit against Juan Martín del Potro on Sunday night.  "It was surprising Djokovic lost," Murray said.



__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4036
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:
"The plan was always that Jamie was going to play with Jo," said the younger Murray.  Jamie is a way more experienced doubles player than me."

Hmm...  That complicates the rankings issue further:  Johanna clearly used her singles ranking of 13 to swing her entry with Jamie (they're shown in the PDF version of the draw).


 Really? When they were questioned before it started it seemed that they were going to see how it went. I suspect that if Andy was out of the singles and still in the mens dubs it would be him partnering Jo.



__________________

Face your fears........Live your dreams!



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41009
Date:

Hmm, bit unfair the wording of Jo's used her singles ranking to swing her entry. While of course it is her singles ranking that's what much of the doubles fields have used and is perfectly normal. And it is what Heather is using just to be an alternate with Andy who is also using his singles ranking. We have no mixed pair that would have been in if we just used doubles rankings. To get one definitely in had to involve Jo with her singles ranking.

Heather simply wouldn't have been in with Jamie whatever ranking she used, given she would have a lower entry ranking with him than Andy ( Andy's singles ranking vs Jamie's doubles ranking ) so again an alternate. And clearly surely Jamie needed a guaranteed entry. The Times ( she's been done over ) article implies she just needed to be paired with Jamie to be in, which is clearly untrue. It's a poor article.

Love her to bits but the real problem here is Heather's best ranking ( singles or doubles ). That didn't really leave a reasonable option. The British selection made perfect sense. And now Heather yes must hope folk withdraw and that Andy plays ( and while sorry for Heather it would be understandable if he didn't ).



-- Edited by indiana on Wednesday 10th of August 2016 06:33:24 PM

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4586
Date:

So basically you can win 6 sets of mixed doubles tennis lose 5 sets and get an Olympic medal.....

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41009
Date:

Jaggy1876 wrote:

So basically you can win 6 sets of mixed doubles tennis lose 5 sets and get an Olympic medal.....


 ... and 3 of these sets won could be MTB sets ( if we are following the London procedure at set all where all 4 of Andy and Laura's matches, 3 wins and a loss on the way to silver, went to a MTB ). Do the mixed also play no Ad  ? -  actually moee a real hate of mine as it truly corrupts a great scoring system.

Players play with someone they have possibly never ( at least very rarely ) played mixed doubles with before as pairs are cobbled together a few days before from these who don't feel overcommited by other events and may qualify on a singles ranking.

That the Grand Slams have mixed doubles is tennis's internal business and very jolly for many and mildly serious for others, but don't hit the ball too hard straight against a woman. It should have no place whatsoever at the Olympics among so many competitors that strive for many many years to be all they can be both individually and as a team dreaming of these Olympic medals.



-- Edited by indiana on Thursday 11th of August 2016 07:21:12 PM

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

First set to Mr Murray 6-1. Fognini got his first game at 5-1.

__________________
«First  <  14 5 6 7 812  >  Last»  | Page of 12  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard