Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 32 - Olympic Tennis Competition - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil - Hard


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41009
Date:
Week 32 - Olympic Tennis Competition - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil - Hard


Jaggy1876 wrote:

Doubles really is a lottery. The more I watch it the more I get that feeling. 70 per cent random/luck 30 per cent skill.


I'm not a huge doubles lover though sometimes do get into matches, and don't get me started again on mixed and particularly mixed at the Olympics. But I really can't see how such figures remotely tie in with reality, particularly as here in best of three set matches with 'proper scoring'. 

And I don't think your further reference to the final point "a net cord decides the match" in the Andy / Jamie loss advances you far. There were rather a lot of other points in the match, which had the same scoring system as singles, and I believe you can get net cords in singles as well, e.g. final point in the Del Potro vs Djokovic match. Few sports are without occasional bits of luck.



-- Edited by indiana on Monday 8th of August 2016 03:22:59 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55555
Date:

Vandenburg wrote:

Could someone explain the mixed doubles for me? Could we enter two teams?


 

Presume so.

The French, I believe, have two teams in.

 



__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2016
Date:

So Jamie and Jo 

 

and......



__________________

World renowned expert in Nordic tennis. 



Junior player

Status: Offline
Posts: 98
Date:

Daniel completely exposing Edmund. From 3-0 up, he loses the set 4-6.

__________________


Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 315
Date:

Kyle lost 4-6 5-7 :(

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58087
Date:

L32:  Taro Daniel (JPN) WR 118 defeated Kyle Edmund WR 83 by 4 & 5 disbelief



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23459
Date:

Wow. My internet went on go-slow, and the last I saw was 3-0, and he was looking good. That result is going to hurt.

__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1399
Date:

Kyle was also up to 5-2 I think, in the second, and lost 5 straight games to cede the match.
I'm sure he'll be very disappointed, but hopefully not despondent.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19401
Date:

thejester wrote:

Kyle was also up to 5-2 I think, in the second, and lost 5 straight games to cede the match.
I'm sure he'll be very disappointed, but hopefully not despondent.


 Not that it changes the result but he was only 4-2 up then back to 4-4. Disappointing yes, but more good experience in the bank. We all know that Kyle still has a lot of aspects to his game that can improve. I see that as a positive. 



__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1399
Date:

Bob in Spain wrote:
thejester wrote:

Kyle was also up to 5-2 I think, in the second, and lost 5 straight games to cede the match.
I'm sure he'll be very disappointed, but hopefully not despondent.


 Not that it changes the result but he was only 4-2 up then back to 4-4. Disappointing yes, but more good experience in the bank. We all know that Kyle still has a lot of aspects to his game that can improve. I see that as a positive. 


Thanks for clarifying that Bob, I only had a half an eye on it really. And yes, I'm not going to start panicking. Kyle is still raw in a lot of ways and, like any player, perfectly capable of having an off day. That's sport. 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41009
Date:

Pity. Yes Kyle still building experience. Be good though if he could have a little run ( big one too if he likes ) at a big tournament.

__________________


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1677
Date:

Vandenburg wrote:

So Jamie and Jo 

 

and......




I wouldn't have expected Jo to enter unless she and Heather loose their women's doubles tonight and it happens before the sign in. She wouldn't play 3 matches a day.

Heather and either Andy or Jamie might be have the ranking to get in.

__________________


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 617
Date:

On ranking probably Jamie and Jo the best placed to make the cut, if Jo is not keen then I would imagine Jamie's ranking might swing it for Heather. Can't see two teams though and I would expect Andy to do the decent thing and let his brother take the slot if it comes to that so that they both have a shot at a medal.

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4586
Date:

theemptyvessel wrote:

On ranking probably Jamie and Jo the best placed to make the cut, if Jo is not keen then I would imagine Jamie's ranking might swing it for Heather. Can't see two teams though and I would expect Andy to do the decent thing and let his brother take the slot if it comes to that so that they both have a shot at a medal.


 I think you are probably right and given the choice Andy would step aside but for me this again represents my problem with this. It's not exactly a talent based inclusion and kind of weakens the argument for having it included here at all. Along with the fact doubles is....well I won't bore you all again when my opinions are clear on this. Nothing against Jamie of course who is a great ambassador for GB.

Looking back Laura Robson winning an Olympic Silver medal tells you whats wrong with everything when a player barely with any titles gets one. She won a 10k singles of course....



__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4586
Date:

Tonight I've found myself watching swimming, table tennis and volleyball instead of tennis when I don't follow any of those Sports. Again says it all.

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5 612  >  Last»  | Page of 12  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard