Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Weeks 26-27 - Wimbledon 2016 - London, UK - Grass


ATP qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2847
Date:
Weeks 26-27 - Wimbledon 2016 - London, UK - Grass


Bit of a farcical situation that could have been avoided by suspending the match one point earlier but a double break for Heather with a chance to regroup and an injured opponent. I haven't seen much of this match since the first few games but with Heather losing 7 games in a row I can have a guess that she is not playing well!

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10683
Date:

Woohoo Jo!

__________________


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9477
Date:

Jo wasn't as impressive as yesterday but got the job done nicely, another toughie next.

As for Hev, very nice clean performance in the 1st, but since then..... Summed up by the last point, with her opponent on the ground, can't find the court to win an easy point. I think Beck will be fine, and you'd like to think that Hev will be a different player on the resumption, can't be any worse anyway.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:

Genie wins the late night rescheduled match, and so is Jo's next opponent.

Just Heather to be resolved - bit surprised they didn't put that on Centre instead of Genie.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:

*R1: Heather WATSON (GBR) 50 v. Annika BECK (GER) 44 [*To finish 6-3 0-6 0-1]
R1: (WC) Tara MOORE (GBR) 227 defeated Alison VAN UYTVANCK (BEL) 132 6-3 6-2
R1: (WC) Katie Swan (GBR) 441 lost to Timea BABOS (HUN) 45 2-6 3-6
R1: Johanna KONTA (GBR) [16] 18 defeated Monica PUIG (PUR) 43 6-1 7-5
R1: (WC) Laura ROBSON (GBR) 294 lost to Angelique KERBER (GER) [4] 4 2-6 2-6
R1: Naomi BROADY (GBR) 84 lost to Elina SVITOLINA (UKR) [17] 19 2-6 3-6

R2: (WC) Tara MOORE (GBR) 227 v. Svetlana KUZNETSOVA (RUS) [13] 14 (CH 2, Sep. 2007)
R2: Johanna KONTA (GBR) [16] 19 v. Eugenie BOUCHARD (CAN) 48 (CH 5, Oct. 2014)

__________________
Jan


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 7958
Date:

Glad Hev has a chance to re-think. Good luck for tomorrow!

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:

Heather resumes at 11:00, back on Court 12
Johanna finishes up the Centre Court schedule, 3rd after 13:00 (following immediately after Andy)

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55489
Date:

Nice that it's Katie Boulter who makes the front page of New York Times' tennis coverage....

www.nytimes.com/2016/06/29/sports/tennis/nike-wimbledon-premier-slam-dress.html

thanks to her savviness in tying down that damn dress....

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

Nice that it's Katie Boulter who makes the front page of New York Times' tennis coverage....

www.nytimes.com/2016/06/29/sports/tennis/nike-wimbledon-premier-slam-dress.html

thanks to her savviness in tying down that damn dress....


I hear Nike's US Open dress comes accessorized with a lamp-post and a public defender.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40936
Date:

Hopefully Hev can now come back refocused and with her game back in much better order, having looked destined for defeat on Wednesday.

So far 5 in total through to R2 from the men and women slightly beats the accumulated betting of 4.7. And if Hev can make it 6 it will have overall been a pretty good R1 even if some of the losses were rather more clearcut than some hopes ( no sets won in the 9 lost matches ).

Andy, Heather, Jo and Evo were the favourites in their matches so no Brithish favourite ( yet, Hev! ) overturned, and Tara and Marcus beat the odds to different degrees.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5134
Date:

The Nike dress is a fabulous addition to the sporting maternity wardrobe, fabulous that they have been so inclusive and broad minded in their development of sports clothing but really if you are trying to work every angle to win a grand slam there are vastly superior designs that allow unimpeded movement.

Katie looked great in it, played very well against a slightly older and more highly ranked player but lost a very very winnable game, I don't think it was a distraction for her or anyone watching, definitely some lessons to be learnt as far managing the backend of a game is concerned, it shows what's great psychological challenge tennis is, having to modify her clothing is the least of her worries.

Summary, Nike ladies tennis wear Wimbledon 2016, not fit for serious athletes, not fit for purpose, end of.

__________________
Jan


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 7958
Date:

I thought the dress looked more like a parachute - I reckon it would definitely just get in the way generally and slow the player down when running.

__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1839
Date:

Oakland2002 wrote:

Summary, Nike ladies tennis wear Wimbledon 2016, not fit for serious athletes, not fit for purpose, end of.


 Most of the opprobrium heaped upon Nike appears to come from spectators and press - particularly the press as it gives them an excuse to publish pictures of scantily clad ladies whilst pretending to be offended - rather than players.

Some of the ladies say they like it, and the ones that do wear it apparently had the alternative of a skirt/ top rig. ("Aside from the mandatory fixes made to the dress, Nike also offered its players the option of wearing a more traditional skirt and top combination. There were several takers.") I particularly liked the headlines about Serena ("The Nike 'nightie' that Serena Williams REFUSES to wear") when Serena never wears the generic Nike kit, she always has her own.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55489
Date:

I think Katie B should get special intelligence mention for actually trying out the dress BEFORE taking to the court - hence having to search round the house to find something (an old hairband in the end) to secure it down.

Several players who did agree that it floats too much, and it was a problem, seem to have found that a surprise !!!

And the Nike seamstress obviously had a tough day, sewing up all those little split seams.

Obviously some players were happy with it, but it's pretty rare, christ, for the players to choose NOT to wear the new special kit so the fact that there was a more basic, normal one on offer is hardly really in Nike's favour, in my view.

__________________


ATP qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2847
Date:

I think Nike have tried too hard to make a dress that stands out from the others within the all-white rules of Wimbledon, and as a result practicality has gone out of the window.

__________________
«First  <  17 8 9 10 1116  >  Last»  | Page of 16  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard