Daniel Evans [1/340] v Evan Hoyt Marcus Willis v Patrick Foley [WC] Jack Findel-Hawkins [WC] v Finn Bass [WC] Neil Pauffley [WC] v Tom Farquharson [3/481]
Edward Corrie [2/457] v 10 Billy Harris Luke Johnson [WC] v Lloyd Glasspool Luke Bambridge v Jonathan Gray Isaac Stoute [WC] v Brydan Klein [4/499]
Just as I feared - Finn Bass and Jack FH both end up in Dan's half so chance for them. This now seems such a pointless exercise. I'd like to see Jonny Grey come through the other half
Herman is becoming the new Andrew Castle for me. In fact most of the BBC team do my head in. The Eurosport guys are far more knowledgable than Henman, Castle, Becker etc. Id take Greg over Tim anyday. Also rather have Jamie Baker, Anne Keothavong, Naomi Cavaday etc doing more commentary.
Henman is the classic toff out of touch with reality, he is really starting to annoy me. Can see exactly why he is in there, meets the criteria perfectly.
I agree Henman is very bland in commentary. At the end of it you cant really remember if hes said anything at all. Also I once saw him with his wife in Richmond striding along at least ten feet in front of her, completely unconcerned about her trying to catch up; it seemed quite arrogant as no one s bothering him and it put me off. I like Mark Petchy, Peter Fleming and McEnroe doing the commentary. And Rusedski and Annabel Croft are good analysts/post match interviewers. Theres also a female commentafor (cant remember her name) that does quite technical analysi of womens matches: explaining how they need to turn their body slightly differently or adjust their stance etc.
I am sure Evan Hoyt is not happy with the AELTC's decision, nor anyone else in Evo's half of the draw. Marcus may very well get that match up with Evo that he was posting about.
Herman is becoming the new Andrew Castle for me. In fact most of the BBC team do my head in. The Eurosport guys are far more knowledgable than Henman, Castle, Becker etc. Id take Greg over Tim anyday. Also rather have Jamie Baker, Anne Keothavong, Naomi Cavaday etc doing more commentary.
Henman is the classic toff out of touch with reality, he is really starting to annoy me. Can see exactly why he is in there, meets the criteria perfectly.
I agree Henman is very bland in commentary. At the end of it you cant really remember if hes said anything at all. Also I once saw him with his wife in Richmond striding along at least ten feet in front of her, completely unconcerned about her trying to catch up; it seemed quite arrogant as no one s bothering him and it put me off. I like Mark Petchy, Peter Fleming and McEnroe doing the commentary. And Rusedski and Annabel Croft are good analysts/post match interviewers. Theres also a female commentafor (cant remember her name) that does quite technical analysi of womens matches: explaining how they need to turn their body slightly differently or adjust their stance etc.
I also like the ones you mention plus Andrew Cotter. I enjoyed the Andy Roddick and Lleyton Hewitt stints but they were all too brief (although Hewitt probably still busy playing!)
Henman is dreadful and WHY the BBC employ him I will never know great tennis player cheap commentator. Rusedsli is much better but the BBC never use him now
Henman is dreadful and WHY the BBC employ him I will never know great tennis player cheap commentator. Rusedsli is much better but the BBC never use him now
Henman is dreadful and WHY the BBC employ him I will never know great tennis player cheap commentator. Rusedsli is much better but the BBC never use him now
He is elsewhere - eurosport maybe?
I think rusedski is one of the experts on the new amazon prime coverage of Queens, the times ran a review of it and gave it good marks.