I even think it sends a good message to the youngsters - that there will be some support for you throughout your career.
I hate the way many (especially at the NTC/LTA) want to always jump to the next generation and write off the current ones.
i.e. it's always going to be great in five years time because of the promising crop coming through.
AND I'm obviously a huge supporter of juniors.
Ed certainly has a good grass game: one of the few to win a round at Wimbly qualies. And made round two in Surbiton (unlike Alex). And deserves it as much as anyone else.
Of course, he does have connections - it might be a bit easier when your dad's on the Board.
But overall I think he's a decent choice.
Good points, CD, we've got quite enough decent players basically calling it quits on their pro career at rather younger ages than Ed, some possibly through perceived lack of support, at a time when the international high ranked range is getting older.
Yes, I do of course want to see support for up and coming players, but not by over ageist thinking and throwing such as Ryan in well over his head. The choice of Ed here makes eminent sense.
Why on earth does Ed Corrie deserve a QWC? His ranking has been falling off all year.... Can someone explain?
Why not give it to a promising junior? (i.e. Ryan Storrie)
Apart from what others have said re him being relatively good on grass, that is just factually wrong.
Ed is so far up 77 places this year from WR 453 to WR 376. This upward movrment ties in with his 2016 race position of #236. I'll grant one challenger run got him a large portion of these points, but still.
He also played only three tournaments in the last five months of 2015. I didn't have my eye on the ball then, so I don't remember anything, but it suggests some kind of injury problem that could have depressed his ranking.
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
Pity. But a good match and good experience. And this experience of the past few months must be giving a real sense that this level - Tour and Challenger - is the right place to be. Upwards and onwards.
Carole Bouchard further points out that (if Mr Edmund doesn't account for him) Andy Murray's theoretical route is Mahut, Paire and Simon in succession.
Alex so unlucky! The game he got broken, the first point looked like it caught the line to me but was called out. He would have won the next point but a ball from an adjacent court came on. He slipped in the next point I think. Also looked out of the 2nd set Tie break but managed to get back in it!
A great game and he didn't look outclassed by a player ranked 167 places above him.