Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Weeks 21 & 22 - French Open 2016 (clay) - doubles


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58073
Date:
RE: Weeks 21 & 22 - French Open 2016 (clay) - doubles


Stircrazy wrote:

R1:  Jonathan Erlich (ISR) & Colin Fleming CR 106 (47+59) defeated Paul-Henri Mathieu & Benoît Paire (FRA/FRA) CR 603 (440+163) by 3 & 0 smile

*****

R2:  (14) Daniel Nestor & Aisam-ul-Haq Qureshi (CAN/PAK) CR 67 (14+53) vs Jonathan Erlich (ISR) & Colin Fleming CR 106 (47+59)


R1:  (4) Jamie Murray & Bruno Soares (BRA) CR 13 (3+10) defeated Evgeny Donskoy & Andrey Kuznetsov (RUS/RUS) CR 1661 (1317+344) by 3 & 3

*****

R2:  (WC) David Guez & Vincent Millot (FRA/FRA) CR UNR (351+0 - but a CH of 624 in May 2013) vs (4) Jamie Murray & Bruno Soares (BRA) CR 13 (3+10)



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19401
Date:

I see Mahut has retired from his singles match today when he was 2 sets down to Granollers. I wonder if that is an injury or just saving himself for the doubles.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

Nice, quick win. Well done.

A doubles-related but not GB-related question (though he's somewhat GB by adoption). I noticed that Eric Butorac and Scot Lipsky's 1st round match was one of the first doubles matches on. The same has happened with his second round match, which was held this morning. Is this because of his role as President of the Player's Council? I know that the council meets during the Grand Slams, so he must have quite a lot to do - and conjectured that they might be trying to free his time up. Does anyone have a sense of how things operate? At any rate, he's won again ... so no excessive free time for another few days. I'm quite glad actually - always seems like such a decent, sensible sort.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

Bob in Spain wrote:

I see Mahut has retired from his singles match today when he was 2 sets down to Granollers. I wonder if that is an injury or just saving himself for the doubles.


 Nooo! Or rather, I hope it's that he's saving himself for the doubles.



-- Edited by Spectator on Thursday 26th of May 2016 02:50:01 PM

__________________


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9477
Date:

Bob in Spain wrote:

I see Mahut has retired from his singles match today when he was 2 sets down to Granollers. I wonder if that is an injury or just saving himself for the doubles.


 He had a MTO for a back problem during the 2nd set of his 1st round singles match, and played on and won comfortably, so I suspect it's a niggle and something he needs to protect but he will probably be ok for doubles.



__________________
DF


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 11728
Date:

Jamie on Court 15 in mixed doubles action. 1-1

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58073
Date:

indiana wrote:

Melo & Dodig beat the Bryans in the final with Tecau and Roger as semi finalists. The two in best shape as far as the 'in running' points to be WR 1 are Mahut and Murray who are just dropping L16 points ( 180 points ) from last year.

There are 5 potential number 1s post the French Open ( the top 8 being within 2000 points going in 'in running' but Herbert, Rojer and M Bryan can't overtake their partners )

Taking off last year's  points :

1. Mahut : 7580 - 180 = 7400

2. Murray : 7535 - 180 = 7355

3. Herbert : 7190 - 180 = 7010

4. Tecau : 7450 - 720 = 6730

5. Rojer : 7290 - 720 = 6570

6. B Bryan : 6870 - 1200 = 5670

7. M Bryan : 6870 - 1200 = 5670

8. Melo : 7590 - 2000 = 5590

 

Very difficult to say what Jamie needs to do to be #1 post the French Open and / or going into Wimbledon. Theoretically even winning just one round could do it if Mahut lost in R1 and the other contenders fell fairly early. Winning the title would certainly do it !


Let's throw this one into the mix:  Rojer & Tecau, the second seeds this year, are out, beaten by Cuevas & Granollers by 7-5 4-6 3-6... 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 41000
Date:

Yay, down to 4 contenders for #1, Mahut, Murray, B Bryan and Melo and the last two are barely hanging in mathematically.

(2) Roger & Tecau were (4) (err) Jamie & Bruno's theoretical seeds to meet in the SF, although potentially rather annoyingly (5) the Bryans have ended up in the boys' quarter.



-- Edited by indiana on Friday 27th of May 2016 02:58:13 PM

__________________
DF


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 11728
Date:

indiana wrote



(2) Roger & Tecau were (4) Andy & Bruno's theoretical seeds to meet in the SF, although potentially rather annoyingly (5) the Bryans have ended up in the boys' quarter.


 Andy?



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 41000
Date:

DF wrote:
indiana wrote



(2) Roger & Tecau were (4) Andy & Bruno's theoretical seeds to meet in the SF, although potentially rather annoyingly (5) the Bryans have ended up in the boys' quarter.


 Andy?


I am discovering what age I begin to increasingly write fairly random silly things down. Let's try Jamie.

"Murray" was working better  



-- Edited by indiana on Friday 27th of May 2016 03:00:01 PM

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2442
Date:

Jamie+ going well on Court 6, 5-2, deuce, set point, adv in, deuce, etc...

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2442
Date:

6-2 to the good.

__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1399
Date:

The boys a break down in the 2nd *0-2

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58073
Date:

Bit of an up-&-down second set, but the boys get the job done...

R2:  (4) Jamie Murray & Bruno Soares (BRA) CR 13 (3+10) defeated (WC) David Guez & Vincent Millot (FRA/FRA) CR UNR (351+0) by 6-2 7-6(5)

******

R3:  (16) Marcin Matkowski & Leander Paes (POL/IND) CR 71 (20+51) vs (4) Jamie Murray & Bruno Soares (BRA) CR 13 (3+10)



__________________
TMH


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1776
Date:

Those rankings are very deceiving. Tough match that.

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5  >  Last»  | Page of 5  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard