I find myself in a difficult position in terms of buying tennis kit for my kids. Having a reasonable understanding of when a drug should and shouldn't be prescribed for medical reasons, I struggle to square a number of recent arguments about the use of non FDA (an organisation whose judgement I trust) approved medication by an individual predominantly resident in the USA for medical treatment! Oh and additionally has been placed on the banned list for its performance enhancing properties.
The individual concerned is retaining the support of their kit manufacturer, it is of course the kit manufacturers prerogative to do what they think is right, however given my view it is my prerogative to spend my pound somewhere else additionally I am sure this ethical argument is as clear as mud around fair trade but although I like good kit, there are many other things I can do first before shaving a few grams off my racket that I can do to enhance it.
We as a family no longer own any Head rackets, kit or shoes where should I look from an ethical perspective to replace it??
-- Edited by Oakland2002 on Sunday 22nd of May 2016 05:53:57 AM
I suspect you are speaking about sports ethics (eg the sponsorship) rather than general ethics (ie how they treat labourers, environmental care, etc) but if the latter should also be of interest, this may be helpful: www.ethicalconsumer.org/buyersguides/clothing/sportswear.aspx. The ranking mechanism allows you to prioritise or de-emphasise certain criteria, depending on your own positions/concerns.
-- Edited by Spectator on Sunday 22nd of May 2016 07:59:40 AM
I am not sure how people can really advise you on this. What you consider to be ethical behaviour and what someone else considers to be ethical behaviour may well be very different. It comes down to your own values and what you consider to be important.
Data is generally hard to benchmark, the neutrality of those doing the benchmarking is hard to verify, and reports tend to only exist for clothing rather than equipment, and even then, only for the very biggest brands i.e. Nike, Adidas.
I am not sure how people can really advise you on this. What you consider to be ethical behaviour and what someone else considers to be ethical behaviour may well be very different. It comes down to your own values and what you consider to be important.
Thanks for that I am thinking Asics tennis shoes, Umbro shorts, THTC hemp T shirt (look fantastic but may get barred from Wimbledon) and Patagonia fleece with Columbia waterproofs for Roland Garos.
Tennis racket a bit of a struggle, will definitely base that on corporate attitude to players confessing to use of performance enhancing drugs and then despite accepting full responsibility for their actions doing everything they can to mitigate an appropriate punishment. Ie failing cyclings "Miller test of true accountability", I know there is very little will within the sport to hold top players let alone paymasters who subsidise the sport at grass routes level to account but there is no place for lack of clarity, if you support an athlete who has confessed to the use of performance enhancing drugs and peddle your equipment to 7 year olds playing red ball that is a brand I want nothing to do with.
Any suggestion on the racket, presently got my old Dunlop Maxply out, but catgut is a nightmare to source and I need a non drug tainted upgrade.
I am still keeping going with this. Inspired by headlines in the LA times about Donald planning to initiate oil and gas exploration of the Californian coast, I took time yesterday to visit the Patagonia store/factory ie. just went into the store in Ventura.
Their story is a great one if you are at all interested in the environment and sustainable environmentally friendly clothes manufacturing. I have now purchased some kit that isn't too shabby, indeed their "baggies" (shorts) perfectly suit my need ie. appropriate leg coverage whilst still qualifying as shorts and should keep me going through the season. It definitely does not come cheap but is pretty durable so plan to slowly replace most of my sports kit.
We have now completely rid the family tennis gear of everything "Head" hurts me a bit as I really like the Union Jack themed bag but principles must.
Very very happy with Asics tennis shoes tick all the boxes for me, kids still in Babolat but will phase out purely on quality.
Tennis rackets still probably an issue, very hard to change as having rejected Head have certain brand loyalty that will be difficult to give up.