Quite a bit of pressure this week. Mr Murray is defending QF points (180). Mahut, PHH, Melo, and Tecau, his closest competitors, are, somewhat surprisingly, all defending 0 points. All of them could overtake if they won the tournament and Mr Murray went out in the first round.
-- Edited by Spectator on Saturday 30th of April 2016 06:08:13 PM
Yes, 4 could pass Jamie in the rankings this week. The 'in running' starting positions with last year's Madrid points off, which as Spectator said only effects Jamie from the top 5 :
Certainly if Herbert & Mahut win yet another Masters this year Mahut will go to WR 1 ( in some ways would be nice to see though rather not by usurping Jamie ). Melo would also definitely go back to WR 1 if he and Dodig won the title.
The top regular partnerships are all back together after some recent intermingling, and iff ( it's rather unpredictable doubles we're talking about here ) the results went by seeding, the SFs would be :
(1) Herbert & Mahut vs (3) Rojer & Tecau (4) Dodig & Melo vs (2) Murray & Soares
-- Edited by indiana on Monday 9th of May 2016 12:22:45 AM
Hmm. Melo won, so I think he's now back to number one. Life now gets even more interesting, though, as Mahut, Herbert and Tecau all also won. It would, therefore, be feasible for Mahut also to pass Mr Murray if he and PHH reach the SF ... or both Mahut and PHH if they win the SF ... or Mahut and Rojer if the former +PHH reach the SF and Rojer/Tecau beat them and win the tournament.
The Bryans being a team the majority of doubles players swap partners every other year. No surprise that the most successful pairings stick together. Woodies, Williams, Bryans.
Simple fact Doubles is random. Not entirely but the element of skill is debatable. Much easier to become a top 10 doubles players than a top 100 singles.
Tecau and Rojer beat Mahut and PHH (concern about injury for the latter); Bopanna and Mergea beat Dodig and Melo. This sets up, for Mr Murray, the worst-case scenario. He will be passed by both Melo and Mahut, and, should Tecau and Rojer win the title, also by Tecau.
The Bryans being a team the majority of doubles players swap partners every other year. No surprise that the most successful pairings stick together. Woodies, Williams, Bryans.
Simple fact Doubles is random. Not entirely but the element of skill is debatable. Much easier to become a top 10 doubles players than a top 100 singles.
Tecau and Rojer beat Mahut and PHH (concern about injury for the latter); Bopanna and Mergea beat Dodig and Melo. This sets up, for Mr Murray, the worst-case scenario. He will be passed by both Melo and Mahut, and, should Tecau and Rojer win the title, also by Tecau.
Rather depends on what term you want to look at things and how bothered you are as to precise position as against how far off WR 1 in points.
Melo and Mahut are as you say already ahead of Jamie. Them both losing in the SF now stops either of them stretching further ahead. Yes Tecau can also go ahead of Jamie ( and Rojer get very close ), but Jamie will come out of Madrid still only 235 points behind Melo, the reinstated WR 1.
Looking bit further ahead Mahut, backed up by Herbert, looked the biggest danger, with how they've started this year so again them losing in the SF and not getting a fourth successive Masters title is probably no bad thing. Hope Herbert be OK though in interests of competition.
-- Edited by indiana on Saturday 7th of May 2016 08:19:46 PM
Good point. I was thinking more in terms of numbers of players ahead of him than of their distance ahead ... but for the long term, you're quite right, this is far from the worst-case scenario.