Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 15 - USA F13 ($25,000) - Little Rock (hard)


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58069
Date:
RE: Week 15 - USA F13 ($25,000) - Little Rock (hard)


Stircrazy wrote:

L32:  (WC) Matthew Brooklyn UNR vs (7) Nicolaas Scholtz (RSA) WR 393 (CH = 384 last November)

L32:  Sebastian Fanselow (GER) WR 477 (= CH) vs Luke Bambridge WR 492 (CH = 484 last month)


L32:  (8) Evan King (USA) WR 401 (CH = 391 last month) vs (Q) Andrew Watson WR 1582



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:

Last week's top dogs are toppled in the first round this week:

R1:  Alejandro Gómez & Roberto Quiroz (COL/ECU) CR 1581 (494+1087) defeated (3) Luke Bambridge & Darren Walsh CR 571 (307+264) by 5 & 3  bleh


All Brit hope in the doubles extinguished after only one round:

R1:  Jonas Lütjen & Nicolaas Scholtz (GER/RSA) CR 2285 (1666+619) defeated (WC) Matthew Brooklyn & Andrew Dottino (USA) UNR by 2 & 2

___________________________________________________________________________________

The one loss goes with the rankings - and the other is less surprising than it might look. I don't know anything about Alejandro Gomez, but Roberto Quiroz won the junior French and USO doubles, went to university and won all manner of tennis honours. He finished last year and has only been playing full time for a little over half a year - for much of which he hasn't played doubles at all (this is his sixth or seventh doubles tournament). A good background, and very underranked.



-- Edited by Spectator on Wednesday 13th of April 2016 03:02:53 PM



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58069
Date:

Spectator wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:

Last week's top dogs are toppled in the first round this week:

R1:  Alejandro Gómez & Roberto Quiroz (COL/ECU) CR 1581 (494+1087) defeated (3) Luke Bambridge & Darren Walsh CR 571 (307+264) by 5 & 3  bleh


All Brit hope in the doubles extinguished after only one round:

R1:  Jonas Lütjen & Nicolaas Scholtz (GER/RSA) CR 2285 (1666+619) defeated (WC) Matthew Brooklyn & Andrew Dottino (USA) UNR by 2 & 2

___________________________________________________________________________________

The one loss goes with the rankings - and the other is less surprising than it might look. I don't know anything about Alejandro Gomez, but Roberto Quiroz won the junior French and USO doubles, went to university and won all manner of tennis honours. He finished last year and has only been playing full time for a little over half a year - for much of which he hasn't played doubles at all (this is his sixth or seventh doubles tournament). A good background, and very underranked.


Ah, thanks for shedding some light, Spectator. smile 



__________________
TMH


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1776
Date:

Spectator wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:

Last week's top dogs are toppled in the first round this week:

R1:  Alejandro Gómez & Roberto Quiroz (COL/ECU) CR 1581 (494+1087) defeated (3) Luke Bambridge & Darren Walsh CR 571 (307+264) by 5 & 3  bleh


All Brit hope in the doubles extinguished after only one round:

R1:  Jonas Lütjen & Nicolaas Scholtz (GER/RSA) CR 2285 (1666+619) defeated (WC) Matthew Brooklyn & Andrew Dottino (USA) UNR by 2 & 2

___________________________________________________________________________________

The one loss goes with the rankings - and the other is less surprising than it might look. I don't know anything about Alejandro Gomez, but Roberto Quiroz won the junior French and USO doubles, went to university and won all manner of tennis honours. He finished last year and has only been playing full time for a little over half a year - for much of which he hasn't played doubles at all (this is his sixth or seventh doubles tournament). A good background, and very underranked.



-- Edited by Spectator on Wednesday 13th of April 2016 03:02:53 PM


For a moment I thought Alejandro was a former junior prodigy as well, but I was getting him confused with Juan Sebastian Gomez who finished the year junior #1 the same year Quiroz won those titles, and then faded into obscurity.



-- Edited by TMH on Wednesday 13th of April 2016 05:39:39 PM

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

And, in a similar vein, I had a moment where I misread the first name and wondered whether Mr Quiroz' French Open-winning uncle had come out of retirement to play with his nephew! Though a moment's thought and another look recognised that (a) different first name and (b) it's unlikely that someone who won a Grand Slam in 1990 would be the strongest of partners at present.



-- Edited by Spectator on Wednesday 13th of April 2016 07:16:55 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19401
Date:

Luke on serve at 2-2*
Andrew an early break down at 1-2*

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17426
Date:

Luke took the first set, but lost the second.
Andrew was broken immediately and lost the opener. Went a double break up in the second, but pegged back to a tie breaker

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58069
Date:

L32:  (7) Nicolaas Scholtz (RSA) WR 393 defeated (WC) Matthew Brooklyn UNR by 6-3 7-6(2)

L32:  Sebastian Fanselow (GER) WR 477 defeated Luke Bambridge WR 492 by 4-6 6-3 6-4

L32:  (8) Evan King (USA) WR 401 defeated (Q) Andrew Watson WR 1582 by  6-3 7-6(?)

crycrycry



-- Edited by Stircrazy on Thursday 14th of April 2016 09:34:22 AM

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

None of them bad losses given that all involved significant rankings differentials (though Watson is underranked). Not been the happiest of hunting grounds, though.

__________________
DF


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 11728
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

L32:  (7) Nicolaas Scholtz (RSA) WR 393 defeated by (WC) Matthew Brooklyn UNR by 6-3 7-6(2))

 


 Brooklyn won? Sorry,must have misread the above. All three lost-3 sad faces.



-- Edited by DF on Thursday 14th of April 2016 06:42:09 AM

__________________
«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard