I agree, a ranking that results in direct entry into Wimbledon/any GS is an important landmark more relevant to me than top 100. 100 is just a number DE to GS a significant paycheck
I agree, a ranking that results in direct entry into Wimbledon/any GS is an important landmark more relevant to me than top 100. 100 is just a number DE to GS a significant paycheck
WR 100 in tennis is great though in that it is both an aspiration of so many players and is generally just above the point that guarantees a Slam DE, especially where 16 qualifiers ( and 8 WCs ). The Slam DE mark is of course a bit of a moveable feast, with PRs and withdrawals, but 100 has virtually got all bases covered.
And the other marks undoubtably do count with many players, some more than others, but many will be part of medium to longer term aims and plans as well as landmarks cared about. Maybe a few couldn't care re say 199, 200 or 201 but I would think a minority.
-- Edited by indiana on Wednesday 30th of March 2016 05:08:42 PM
I thought his ball toss was really strange, often throwing it out instead of straight up. Thoroughly uninspiring player, keeps the ball in court, playing the angles and waiting for the error.