Amandine Hesse is a pretty classy player WHEN on form - she's one of the most mercurial players on the circuit. With a lot heavier ball than Katie's.
So, without having seen it, I don't think Katie necessarily had an off-day or that it was very surprising she lost heavily - she was playing a player who is a fair bit better than her (at the moment) and a LOT better than her (at the moment) when she's on song.
Amandine Hesse is a pretty classy player WHEN on form - she's one of the most mercurial players on the circuit. With a lot heavier ball than Katie's.
So, without having seen it, I don't think Katie necessarily had an off-day or that it was very surprising she lost heavily - she was playing a player who is a fair bit better than her (at the moment) and a LOT better than her (at the moment) when she's on song.
I never had Ms Hesse pegged as a future top 100 player, so for me, I don't know about anyone else, felt Katie had a real shout here of an upset. I am a huge believer in not only Katie's future potential, but also her current potential. I certainly saw that 1st hand in Eilat, and even in her performance at Sunderland albeit she wasn't at her best there. So to end up at the scoreline we had today with only 80 points played, I would say its a combination of 3 factors assuming of course Katie was feeling 100% : 1. The matchup/Hesses's style of play just didn't suit Katie 2. Hesse played a 9/10 match and 3. Katie did have an off day. So that's my speculative answer.