Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 4 - Challenger ($50,000) - Maui, Hawaii (hard)


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 527
Date:
RE: Week 4 - Challenger ($50,000) - Maui, Hawaii (hard)


neither Kyle or Naomi's semis are on the streamed court and 2 of the 3 matches that are being played there are doubles - that's a disgrace!



__________________


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 121
Date:

The other two courts are streamed, there is just no commentary.



-- Edited by Long time reader on Saturday 30th of January 2016 05:55:20 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17426
Date:

Duckworth has withdrawn, so Kyle has a walkover

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19401
Date:

paulisi wrote:

Duckworth has withdrawn, so Kyle has a walkover


Early night for me then.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58069
Date:

Bob in Spain wrote:
paulisi wrote:

Duckworth has withdrawn, so Kyle has a walkover


Early night for me then.


Easy night for us all! wink  For what it's worth, he's (Duckworth, that is) the top seed in Tazzie...



__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1399
Date:

I'm very tired, someone remind me of Kyle gets points/prize money runner-up if he loses the final, or just semi-final points and/or money?

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 40994
Date:

thejester wrote:

I'm very tired, someone remind me of Kyle gets points/prize money runner-up if he loses the final, or just semi-final points and/or money?


He gets all the runner up goodies    ( which is entirely logical given he or any player in such a situation might well have won anyway ).



__________________


ATP qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2706
Date:

I think the principle is that once you've won your first match then you get points and money for whatever round you reach whether by win, retirement or walkover.  



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 40994
Date:

You'ed get R1 win points & money for a retirement and I'm almost certain a walkover too ( though here you'ed expect a LL to be available ).

I think just reaching R2 by a bye is an issue, certainly re points.

__________________
Jan


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 7964
Date:

all good!

__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1399
Date:

Thanks Indy and Optimist. So that's a decent chunk of points covered, though a title here would be superb. Not that I'm overly concerned by Kyle defending points. As said there's a much bigger picture for this lad and he's more than proved himself to be capable of getting wins at challenger and ATP level

__________________


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 617
Date:

So two brief matches and a walkover plus he spent the week in Hawaii. Now I am even less concerned by his workload



-- Edited by theemptyvessel on Sunday 31st of January 2016 01:01:39 AM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19401
Date:

SF: (1) Kyle Edmund WR 88 beat (3) James Duckworth (AUS) WR 129 (CH = 82 in April last year) w/o

-------------------------

Final: (1) Kyle Edmund WR 88 vs Di Wu (CHN) WR 243 (CH = 161 May 2013)

__________________
TMH


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1776
Date:

The only time a player doesn't get the ranking points for making a round (and I'm not sure if it applies to prize money too) - that I'm aware of - is when a player has a bye in the first round. In that situation (only with the Masters and some ATP events), if the player loses in R2 having had a bye in R1, they only get R1 ranking points (usually 5-10 points for turning up).

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17426
Date:

8pm streamed and Kyle 1/5 with the bookies

__________________
«First  <  14 5 6 7 8  >  Last»  | Page of 8  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard