You might be interested that the British Tour is being extended to a 3rd tier for 2016. With a number of one day events being played with the fast 4 format. Allowing players who are unavailable to compete in week long events to compete. Very positive news in my opinion.
Interesting, too, that it specifically prioritises over-19s.
Of course, there's zero prize money. I do hope that the organisers fork out to provide a 'little something', even if it's a voucher, or a batch of free strings or something - you can;t have a competition that give absolutely nothing to the winner.
I would like to know, as I always do, the economics of it. Do Aegon/LTA provide any money to venues. If not I could easily see the £320 (16 draw x £20 entry) dissapear with court fees, referees, balls etc...meaning there would be little in the way of prize money. I guess the big draw is the ranking points available, to allow players to build up enough points to enter the odd week long tournament when they do have a chance. I feel this will only add to the strength of the British Tours, because previously these part-time players would never have enough ranking points to get accepted. Since this is adding a tier, rather than modifying an existing one, I don't have any problem with the adults over juniors priority, there are still just as many opportunities for them.
As it's an adult competition, entry is based on rating rather than ranking. Generally speaking, adults compete less regularly than juniors and so ranking is seen as a bit irrelevant when it comes to differentiating their standard.
Personally I wish they hadn't lumped this new circuit in with the British Tour. Domestically, the BT is seen as quite a high level event, one of the few events where matches are played as 3 full sets as on the tour, and doing well in it carries a fair bit of prestige. We certainly need more adult competition which is not aimed at the elite and this new set of tournaments should help, but a format so far from the BT concept should be marketed as a separate circuit IMO. Format: 2 x sets to 4, 5 point TB at 3 all, deciding 10pt MTB.
Rating and ranking does my head in. I still don't see why there's a need for both. No other country I know has it.
And it's a fair point that it would have given it more 'character' to be be a separate event, not just an add-on.
But why shouldn't tennis players play three sets?
That's what tennis players do.
I don't quite understand why non-elite tennis has to be dumbed down. It seems to me part of the problem here that tennis is a leisure activity and not a sport. I guess, if that;s what it is and that's what people want, then fine. But the sooner more 'average' people play tennis as a sport, the better it will be.
The Clarkes (who are relatively local) are playing at Loughborough this week, entering as wildcards.
Both through to the quarters, Jay without breaking a sweat.
George Davies, Samuel Ferguson and Luke Oakley, the other ATP ranked players, are also through to the QFs, as are Ryan Lambert, Jamie Prad. and Peter Ashley.
Congrats to qualifier, Ryan Lambert (qui?), who defeated George Davies ATP WR 1623. (Mind you, I was seriously unimpressed by George's game last week....)
Luke Oakley WR 1689 also lost, to Jamie Prad. (Enjoyed watching Luke play - hard-working player).
Curtis Clarke WR came a cropper too, this time to Peter Ashley.
Leaving only Jay Clarke to uphold ATP honour, beating Sam Ferguson.
The Clarkes won today.
Jake Heresy defeated ATP ranked Sam Ferguson.
Soto's Nathan Rooney gave Adam TB a real run for his money but Adam came through in three.
Other winners were Jamie W, Joe Ellis, Elliott Farmer, Nick Turnbull, Josh Golding, Sean Hodkin, Millen Hurrion, Cheraag Bajwa, Mason Recci, Josh Sapwell, Harvey Shackleton and Matt Bailey