Totally agree with all that. Certainly it's the way we have had to play it. It's frustrating though as its never been a level playing field. USA college is immense though, great opportunity and feel blessed my kids can do it.
I also posted this after Megan Davies recruiting video (in the Nationals thread) which looked impressive. This is probably a better place for it.
Although the UK national championship has been criticised elsewhere for not attracting some of the more elite juniors, the upside is it functions as a recruiting fare for college tennis, with a significant number of players playing at a level consistent within being recruited to the best college programs.
Danielle Collins (22 y/o) beat Hayley Carter (21y/o) JCH's 430 and 540 respectively in the women's NCAA final.
Looking at the seeded players and those that progressed to the QF, one player had no ITF rank, the stand out junior players being two of the three freshman on show both overseas players and in single figures (10,11 and 517) the average was 281.85 and the range 10-1388, excluding the player with no rank.
Interestingly the player with the highest rank is at Pepperdine a very conservative school in Malibu play in the WCC a conference exclusively for religiously affiliated schools who as recently as dec 14 was sued by two Basketball players alleging discrimination because of their sexual orientation. So obviously it is really important to choose a school that is a good fit for the student.
Just to give a broader picture as to the general standard there are 335 give or take division 1 schools with tennis programs that can offer 4.5 tennis scholarships men and 8 tennis scholarships women (thanks footballers, division 1 schools have to offer the same number of female and male scholarships and division 1 football schools in the FBS have 85 football scholarship so for female tennis players it's a win win!).
So from the 2680 potential division 1 tennis scholarships for women, playing across about 335 teams in 35 conferences we whittle it down to the ITA finals.
The intercollegiate tennis singles championship finals ie the best of the best for women ( ie the best supported of the two sexes) would by rankings be consistent with a futures level tournament indeed 9 of my 21 highest ranked and best performing players sampled had won at 10k level and a couple 25k level. This group consisted of 8 x 22 year olds, 6 x 21, 4x 20 and 3 x19, there are mechanisms that allow qualification for the U.S. Open main draw, the NCAA winner and indeed there is an annual competition which is weighted in favour of more senior players ie there are protected places. However I note at least one of the freshman JCH 10/11 has won through ... And likely to fall into the cohort most likely to progress to the WTA ie the one and done who never graduate.
Obviously with so many potential scholarships at Div 1 let alone 2 there are plenty of opportunities to continue playing but it is a pyramid system and the sides are steep with perhaps 1% giving full time tennis a go as a graduate and a fraction of a percent progressing to the WTA. The odds are greatly reduced for a cohort with JCH's less than 30 particularly where there has been some evidence of early transition to senior tennis as a junior (a group likely training almost full time who one would consider young professionals)
Added a couple of late names - Ross Edgar, Jennifer Gogova. Jennifer has signed for Long Island which is in the US news this week for a dispute with its professors and for having locked half its faculty out of the buildings.....hope it all doesn't impact on her too much!!