Watching Hev (ITF JCH 3) struggling against Nicole Gibb (ITF JCH 41) at RG made me check the rest of the non British part of the women's bracket.
Vandy have done well this year, but were seeded to reach the QFs. From next year I hope to see British interest as deep if not deeper year on year with Emily A's recruitment to Stanford.
I think Vandy could be in real trouble in the semifinal up against Emily's future team who are lead by the Canadian Carol Zhao (ITF JCH 9). The seeding seems to be a bit all over the place and I feel a bit for Florida the No2 seeds having to play Stanford (#13) in round 2 who then went on to pop out Michigan (#10) in the QF. In comparison Vandy's journey protected by their No 6 seeding has been less arduous.
I see a battle of the bay coming our way for the final!
-- Edited by Oakland2002 on Monday 23rd of May 2016 02:33:45 AM
I think that while we've had two doubles champions (Dom Inglot and Lloyd Glasspool) and one finalist (Ken Skupski), this is the first time that a GB player has been in the final four for singles, is it not? I've checked the likely candidates, and unless I've misread, while the aforementioned Lloyd Glasspool, Ken Skupski, and Dominic Inglot all not only were spectacular in doubles but also made the higher rounds and/or were ranked within the top 20 in singles (thus guaranteeing themselves "All-American" status), none made the final four. Well done to Mr Norrie.
Alas, he ran up against Mikael Torpegaard (#1 seed) in the SFs and lost 6-3 6-4. But still, a fine tournament!
-- Edited by Spectator on Monday 30th of May 2016 07:47:04 AM
Think you are correct Spectator , thanks for that
Some big names on the NCAA singles winners list, McEnroe , Isner, Benjamin Becker, Bryan not sure which one, Flach
.stan smith Denis Ralston Arthur Ashe
Steve Johnson, kevin curran , Jimmy Connors
Indeed, if you look at his university biography for Spring 2005 (www.georgiadogs.com/sports/m-tennis/mtt/john_isner_150746.html) John Isner won the doubles championship playing with himself - which would truly be a remarkable feat and surely would count as equivalent to winning the singles! Jesting aside, the US university tennis system is so confusing: you're correct that while Isner never won the NCAA championships in singles (lost in 2007 finals to Somdev Devvarman), he did win the ITA national championship. I personally find it hard to keep track with so many different championships - though I'm aware that the NCAA championships seem to have a special meaning (not least because they guarantee a US Open wild card).
Again, congratulations!
-- Edited by Spectator on Monday 30th of May 2016 07:58:39 AM
Interesting to see that Mackenzie McDonald (UCLA) has won the whole thing, doubles and singles.
A 95 er ranked 12 CH as an ITF junior, major singles success limited to SF at Australian open 2012 and more recently some Challenger SF's both following some decent wins (through retirement), no futures titles as yet in singles.
It will be very interesting to see how he goes on the pro circuit, obviously coming through just ahead of a wave of precocious American male USTA talent but chosen to jump off for a bit. He has out performed Isner but not in possession of a lethal weapon that can slay almost everyone outside of the top 10. Will this be the highlight of his singles career?
-- Edited by Oakland2002 on Tuesday 31st of May 2016 03:36:08 AM
I watched a little of him last year in one of the Challengers where he and a number of our players were competing. As you say, he's a complete player, rather than someone with an overwhelming weapon. But barring injury or unforeseen circumstances, I would strongly doubt that this would be the highlight of his singles career.