Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 45 - ITF ($25K) - Bath, UK Hard


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18104
Date:
RE: Week 45 - ITF ($25K) - Bath, UK Hard


Q1: VAN HEUVELEN, Elise (GBR) WC UNR lost to OYEN, Sofie (BEL) 1 451 0-6 3-6
Q1: ASGHAR, Jasmine Amber (GBR) 13 1080 def SMITH, Mia (GBR) UNR 6-4 6-4
Q1: NICHOLLS, Olivia (GBR) lost to MINNEN, Greet (BEL) 2 458 2-6 4-6
Q1: SILLS, Savannah (GBR) WC 15 1141 def APPLETON, Emily (GBR) WC UNR 7-5 6-3
Q1: GRIFFITHS, Ellie-Rose (GBR) WC UNR lost to BARBAT, Karen (DEN) 3 470 0-6 0-6
Q1: BAMBURAC, Sabrina (GBR) 1260 lost to SMITH, Kristina N (USA) 9 868 3-6 1-6
Q1: CROUCH, Mollie (GBR) UNR def PIRAZHENKA, Sviatlana (BLR) 4 472 6-3 6-4
Q1: DIXON, Grace (GBR) UNR lost to EKLUND, Mia Nicole (FIN) 14 1136 2-6 2-6
Q1: ABBOTT, Florence (GBR) WC UNR lost to BOLKVADZE, Mariam (GEO) 5 579 2-6 2-6
Q1: HUTCHINSON, Holly (GBR) UNR def BONIC, Barbara (SRB) 6 642 6-1 6-3
Q1: COVINGTON, Dominique (GBR) UNR lost to CARRUTHERS, Steffi (SAM) 10 874 3-6 0-6
Q1: PHILLIPS, Lisa (GBR) UNR lost to NIEDMERS, Nora (GER) 7 691 0-6 1-6
Q1: HURST, Emma (GBR) 1260 def ASKEW, Sarah Beth (GBR) 8 771 4-6 6-3 7-5
Q1: NASH, Serena (GBR) UNR lost to LEON, Sabastiani (MEX) 12 996 6-7(4) 6-7(4)


Q2: ASGHAR, Jasmine Amber (GBR) 13 1080 v OYEN, Sofie (BEL) 1 451
Q2: SILLS, Savannah (GBR) WC 15 1141 v MINNEN, Greet (BEL) 2 458
Q2: CROUCH, Mollie (GBR) UNR v EKLUND, Mia Nicole (FIN) 14 1136
Q2: HUTCHINSON, Holly (GBR) UNR v CARRUTHERS, Steffi (SAM) 10 874
Q2: HURST, Emma (GBR) 1260 v LEON, Sabastiani (MEX) 12 996

__________________


Masters Series Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 3790
Date:

We still need to have events at this level for our players to progress. For some reason. Players who are capable of playing this choose to play them abroad. No idea why.

If Katy D, EWS, and others played here instead of abroad things would look much better.

__________________

Good luck Team GBR in 2016!!!



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17422
Date:

Don't blame Katy or Emily. They are playing a series of weeks at challenger level which is where they need to play.

The fact is that the schedule isn't ideal for playing at challenger level and Katy and Emily were forced to travel to Australia and Asia where they had the opportunity to play four or five weeks on the bounce rather than two weeks in the UK and then have to search for more tournaments in Europe which are generally loaded.
Don't blame the players when the ITF need to have a hard look at the way they schedule their events

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55491
Date:

paulisi wrote:

Don't blame Katy or Emily. They are playing a series of weeks at challenger level which is where they need to play.

The fact is that the schedule isn't ideal for playing at challenger level and Katy and Emily were forced to travel to Australia and Asia where they had the opportunity to play four or five weeks on the bounce rather than two weeks in the UK and then have to search for more tournaments in Europe which are generally loaded.
Don't blame the players when the ITF need to have a hard look at the way they schedule their events


 

Completely agree.

The LTA should consult as much as possible with the players, to be the best informed possible, when making their decisions.

I expect Katy's plans for Australia, and EWS's, for instance, were made a long time in advance. It's not rocket science to communicate.

You can't blame the players. They, after all, are getting precious little from the LTA - it's not like Katy or EWS are being sponsored by the LTA and so owe them a duty to free up their schedule. And you're never going to get all your players playing. The federation has to factor that in when they make their decisions.

The planning this year's events for the women was a major mess. And I don't believe that there was any communication.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 34418
Date:

The way the LTA schedule women's 25Ks, any Brit who wants to play at that level regularly has no option but to go to Australia, the US or Asia instead, where they tend to schedule them in blocks. As Paul says, the 25Ks in Europe tend to be loaded ... and often on clay, though maybe not so much at this time of year.

I know it's easier with hindsight and we can't be aware of all of the constraints those planning the tournaments may have been working under, but it was entirely foreseeable that this year's schedule of women's ITFs in the UK was nonsensical (badly scheduled for those looking to push on, too few 10Ks to help those who can't afford to travel that much) - indeed, I remember some of us making exactly that point nearly a year ago.

Looking at next year's calendar, it appears that no lessons have been learned (unless they're deliberately trying to make the situation worse and worse - surely not ...) - instead, they seem intent on similarly screwing up the men's schedule which, apart from the glaring lack of Challengers outside the grass court season, seems to have worked a lot better than the women's schedule.



__________________

GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!

GB top 25s (ranks, whereabouts) & stats - http://www.britishtennis.net/stats.html



Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 40941
Date:

Emily in particular generally does her own thing and good luck to her.

She's lately been playing pretty high level events relative to her singles level, but she is clearly generally comfortable in Asia ( OK, let's not mention a certain recent Chinese tournament that she fed back about rather memorably ) and playing qualifying singles and main draw doubles in them makes a fair degree of sense, especially with as mentioned a good run of events.

So how much she is one who would ever have been very likely to change is debatable ( 25Ks limit what she would get from doubles ), but in general communication is a good thing and can't do any harm. There are so many reports from folk inside the game to conclude that the LTA are anything other than lousy in this regard

However, take Emily possibly out the equation, Mandy too ( since the LTA don't do that dirt stuff ) and you are getting down to small numbers for whom 25Ks currently really work.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55491
Date:

Emily WS has also made her hatred of indoor tournaments widely and generally known.

Which is not to say that she won't play any, ever, but that she steers well clear of indoor tennis if at all possible.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18104
Date:

They used to run an excellent outdoor clay event in Bournemouth quite early in the season but for some reason stopped it. Unlike most events it was within 60 miles of where I live so within driving range. Now Bath is the only one left.

__________________
DF


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 11723
Date:

Jasmine lost the first set 1-6

Mollie is down 3-5

Savannah is up 5-3

and Emma is 3-4 down and serving

__________________
DF


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 11723
Date:

Savannah takes the first set 6-3

__________________
DF


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 11723
Date:

Emma levels the set at 4-4 after a huge struggle

__________________
DF


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 11723
Date:

Mollie lost that first set 4-6

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55491
Date:

Well done, Emma !!!

Beats the Mexican player, 7-6(5) 6-3

__________________
DF


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 11723
Date:

Congrats to Emma.

__________________


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 685
Date:

All the other games mentioned ended in defeat for the Britons, so well done Ms Hurst.

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 47  >  Last»  | Page of 7  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard