My rule of thumb for the women is that if you can get to the final twice of a 10K or a semi final of a 25K with a back up in a 10K, then you have the potential to break into the top 500.
Emily Arbuthnott is on the verge of achieving this rule if she wins tomorrow.
I don't have an exact formula, but I always think speed of progression is the best indicator of probable ultimate level of tennis. Once a player is full time on the tour (regardless of what age they start), if they spend more than 12-18 months at any given level (injuries aside) be it 10k, 25k, 250k, then that is probably their regular ceiling, even if they have the odd good result from a higher event in the mix. Those who end up with better rankings do tend to whizz through the lowest couple of levels of tournaments.
Regarding Mirabelle it is an extraordinarily steady progression of results. She's a very focussed and determined young lady and I wish her all the best. We should also remember that, choosing to follow her own path in tennis, she hasn't had the benefit of the wild cards afforded to Freya, Emily A, Harriet, Anna B, the Katie's, and Izzy (esp those in 25Ks which award a point for turning up) and which have afforded them match experience at a level which Mirabelle is only now sampling due to her earlier efforts in qualies.
From how she is so consistently and determinedly developing, and still a 'junior', I'd certainly say Mirabelle has the potential to be top 500. Indeed I fully expect her to be at least that if not coming across unforeseen setbacks, which are always possible.
To me, the more interesting thing with her is just high could she get, and that remains so difficult to even speculate about. I'd agree with The Optimist that a year or two on tour, particularly if 'stuck' at a level then begins to give much clearer indications.
-- Edited by indiana on Friday 30th of October 2015 06:52:32 PM
My rule of thumb for the women is that if you can get to the final twice of a 10K or a semi final of a 25K with a back up in a 10K, then you have the potential to break into the top 500.
Emily Arbuthnott is on the verge of achieving this rule if she wins tomorrow.
Yes, but this doesn't take age into consideration. Or game.
As women peak and achieve their Career Highs (on average) at around age 26 or 27, then Mirabelle - at age 18 and WR 600 - is statistically practically a certainty to be top 500.
Someone age 30 with the same results card would have a different outlook.
Equally, a year ago Freya very clearly had the potential to be top 500. But didn't have the results you're talking about. Jodie is the same (assuming the operation goes well and isn't too serious).
However, being top 500 is not much of an achievement and, as posted above, it's the ease and speed of achieving it that gives some (stress 'some') indication of how likely they are to be top 300, and top
100. As such, Emily Arbuthnott has certainly posted some really encouraging results.
Again, as was talked about a lot in summer, one of the key encouraging thing about her results are not the results themselves but the fact that she has achieved them whilst still being in full-time school
until very recently and playing other sports (I can absolutely see Emily as a super little netball player).
2. Emily's actually a super little lacrosse player.
Seemingly she was injured after the Junior Fed Cup outing in Spain and has to have some op (don't know what).
(I know the injury's not their fault as such but, frankly, that whole Fed Cup thing was a bit of a disaster........)
The interview I read from Em talked about her loving netball - but can just see her being a brilliant lacrosse player too - fast, nippy, strong, fit, good ball skills...
I think that that's very encouraging that Emily has such general sporting skills, once she is devoted much more full time to tennis.
I think tennis in the UK has suffered for so long for not looking out ( particularly past a certain too early age ) for these kids with transferable skills that may have great suitability for tennis, err just get them playing the game to find out more.
I'm presuming the interview to which you refer is the one with Sports Aid, which I just found when I googled her. It's a very impressive interview: she's clearly extremely dedicated as well as gifted, and I can well believe from it that she's strong academically. Is she going to start playing full time? Or is she considering university? I could see the possibilities in going onto the circuit - but equally, she'd be a natural, it would seem, for a strong programme like Stanford's.
Interesting isn't it. Not many women progress on to the top echelons of the professional game via the college route but the opportunities open to Emily if she really is that academic and an elite lacrosse player as a two sport elite athlete at somewhere like Stanford (although Duke would be a better fit if she really is that good at Lacrosse) make going to the right college a very strong option.
Her tennis probably puts her at a level where she would be very well looked after academically and the option to walk on at the very least in a second sport too good to miss and very much encouraged and facilitated at Stanford. Not saying they are ten a penny but to be considered a two sport athlete there takes a bit more than playing a couple of sports for the school more a question of dominating state championships. As an institution the Olympic medal hall of alumni compares favourably with a mid sized European country (2012 Australia or Yorkshire)
Two of their best recent professional athletes were duel sport with Tyler Gaffney being drafted by the Pirates (baseball) coming back to play football and then getting picked up as a running back in the NFL. Toby Gehart was even more impressive playing full baseball seasons forgoing the baseball draft coming second in the Heisman trophy ( best college footballer nationally!) and then getting drafted in the second round to the Minnesota Vikings, he did a difficult degree and was being tutored and examined individually in the days running upto the Heisman presentation a national event with saturated media coverage following the candidates around town in the run up, or Toby's case a bit more limited and a sorry I've got some tests to do.
Thinking on a slightly different level though to have a few very good but academic tennis players who are committed to tennis going to somewhere like Stanford doing a full degree and then potential try the tour would if they were to comeback potentially give them an excellent all round tennis and business education which could bring a new level of professionalism to UKs tennis administration. The most powerful women in the NFL who grew up emersed in football as Mr Jones daughter (Dallas Cowboys) did just that and is now a major contributor to what remains a VERY fiscally sound family business. Lots and lots of options!
I get the sense from the interview that the other sports are more for fun than played competitively.
I thought of Stanford because it's so fine academically and has produced a string of women's professionals in recent years: Nicole Gibbs (left Stanford in 2013) has been in the top 100 this year; Carol Zhao, a current student, is ranked 399 despite still being full-time at university; and Malory Burdette (left Stanford in 2012) was in the 60s. But given her ability and goals, she may well not have university in mind.
Although born in 97, Emily's birthday is late in the year and so she is in the same academic year as the bulk of the 98s, that is currently in the final year of A levels. So I'm pretty certain she hasn't left school yet. She seems to cope with her competitive schedule and academic demands by being incredibly organised - she's the kid who you find in a quiet corner at a tournament getting on with schoolwork. I've heard rumours that she is looking to go to an Ivy League school, but no idea how accurate this is. Whether she ultimately decides to go straight onto the tour, I'm certain she will fully investigate the uni route and I'm equally sure the recruiters will fall over themselves to have her.
Well, I hope Emily Arbuthnott appreciates the wealth of good ideas and advice being given to her above !!!
Who needs the school careers' advisor???
Ivy League certainly sounds a very good possibility.
Personally, I just hope the 'doubles specialist' thing is laid to rest (well, within reason, at any rate).
Of course, if she does rack up some extra good results in the next few weeks (she's just taken the first set against Cadar in her semi in Egypt), she may find the choice all the more tricky.....
Well done to her, and her team (parents, school, coach etc.)