Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Weeks 26 & 27 - Wimbledon - men's main draw (grass)


Specialist Reporter + Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 2432
Date:
RE: Weeks 26 & 27 - Wimbledon - men's main draw (grass)


Ward played ok in what was a rather patchy match. Didn't create many opportunities in the 4th and 5th sets when Pospisil found some decent form.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58051
Date:

For the record:

L32:  Vasek Pospisil (CAN) WR 56 defeated (WC) James Ward WR 111 by 6-4 3-6 2-6 6-3 8-6

I feared the worst when he failed to make any real impression in the fourth set & expected his service to wilt sooner than it actually did! hmm



__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 989
Date:

Gutted, but like has been said he didn't create much in the last 2 sets and Vasek was solid.



-- Edited by LouieG on Saturday 4th of July 2015 06:59:18 PM

__________________


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 406
Date:

I think the nerves got to both Ward and Pospisil and contributed to an overall poor quality match however putting my patriotism aside the Canadian thoroughly deserved to win given his fantastic serving in the 5th set. Given he was serving second he showed no weakness at all. I don't feel as disappointed with this loss as yesterdays Watson heartbreaker.

Ward had a bit of luck with the Ferrer withdrawal, got two wins and is in the top 100 after so many years of trying so should be pleased. I'm not sure how high he can go, top 50 should be his target.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55521
Date:

I completely agree, nicoF.

it wasn't a great match, patchy and bit nervy by both. Ward did a good job, overall, but Pospisil's serving was just amazing in that fifth set. He deserved the win.

Poor Heather's was certainly a far bigger heartbreaker . . .

But a great week, really, by both...

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55521
Date:

The Hoo-hah about the possible 'double hit' of Karlovic on Tsonga's set point is reasonable and all part of tennis and what twitter is made for.

What's not reasonable is that even the BBC does not seem to know the double-hit rule.

www.bbc.com/sport/0/tennis/33395884

the journalist assumes it's illegal without any knowledge of the rule and the fact that, under the rules, it almost certainly was perfectly fine.

__________________
TMH


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1776
Date:

The level of tennis knowledge and research in this country is beyond awful to be honest. There are a handful of decent journalists, but most of the ones at Sky, Eurosport, BBC etc seem to have as much understanding as your typical two-week fan.

SkySports had an article before the tournament about how the organisers had refused to up Nadal's seeding, completely unaware how the seeding actually works. I made a comment pointing out the facts of the matter and surprise surprise it wasn't approved.

They regularly make mistakes and won't take any criticism at all. Does my nut.

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4096
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

I completely agree, nicoF.

it wasn't a great match, patchy and bit nervy by both. Ward did a good job, overall, but Pospisil's serving was just amazing in that fifth set. He deserved the win.

Poor Heather's was certainly a far bigger heartbreaker . . .

But a great week, really, by both...


Agreed; 2 wins for both just what the doctor ordered with Heather's match against Serena above and beyond most expectations (and nearly beyond wildest dreams...which has now become the new expectation smile ).

 

Over to Muzz again now... 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55521
Date:

Of the 16 left,

9 are seeded to be where they are,

5 are seeded 17-32 and 2 are unseeded

The 2 who are unseeded are WR 56 and WR 105 !


There are:

2 Swiss
2 Serbs
2 French
2 Croats
1 Brit
1 American
1 Canadian
1 South african
1 Czech
1 Belgian
1 spaniard
1 Aussie

There are 4 aged over 30, with the oldest being 36

There are 2 aged under 25, with the youngest being aged 20

The average age is 28

__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2012
Date:

so it look's like Ward will land himself in at number 89 in the rankings

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4096
Date:

freerider wrote:

so it look's like Ward will land himself in at number 89 in the rankings


biggrin 



__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1399
Date:

That is going to be so, so satisfying for James to see next to his name

__________________


ATP qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2706
Date:

YESSS!!! So pleased.  Hopefully will allow him to play more freely now.



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

Was so lovely to go onto ATP rankings page this morning and see it in blue and white. Congratulations to Mr Ward - well, well done.

__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2012
Date:

a lot of points to defend over the next month though so will be tough to stay up there for more than 2/3 weeks

__________________
«First  <  134 35 36 37  >  Last»  | Page of 37  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard