Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Wimbledon Qualifiers


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17414
Date:
RE: Wimbledon Qualifiers


Tara and Nik are a break up

Katy and Harriet are a break down

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18097
Date:

Q2: MOORE, Tara (GBR) WC 382 lost to SASNOVICH, Aliaksandra (BLR) 22 136 6-2 2-6 3-6
Q2: DUNNE, Katy (GBR) WC 315 lost to HOGENKAMP, Richel (NED) 13 123 2-6 5-7
Q2: SWAN, Katie (GBR) WC 866 lost to PASZEK, Tamira (AUT) 3-6 3-6

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 10669
Date:

Tara and Nik broken serving for the set

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18097
Date:

Tara & Nic take it on their opponents serve, at I think the 5th set point.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 10669
Date:

Miss four individual set points at 6-5*, but take the fifth!!

7-5 *0-0

C'mon!

Katy and Harriet lost the first set 6-1 but are an early break to the good in the second.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40893
Date:

Pity re the singles, but tough asks as they say.

Still, 20 points useful to all 3, with provisionally on points to date for the post Wimbledon rankings :

Katy D : 129 points, approximately WR 312, GB no 4

Tara : 98 points, approximately WR 365, GB no 8

Katie S : 33 points, approximately WR 620, GB no 13

Tara's general game seems to have been operating reasonably well again for some time. If she could just sort out that serve !!



-- Edited by indiana on Wednesday 24th of June 2015 05:07:07 PM

__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2096
Date:

Not impressed with the BBCs reporting of today's action at Roehampton. Instead of highlighting Evans' win they have elected to pick Katie Swans defeat as a headline. Looking forward to players "crashing out" at Wimbledon next week.

__________________

 



ATP qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2847
Date:

PockyTastic wrote:

Not impressed with the BBCs reporting of today's action at Roehampton. Instead of highlighting Evans' win they have elected to pick Katie Swans defeat as a headline. Looking forward to players "crashing out" at Wimbledon next week.


 Not the first time the BBC have seemingly left the tennis reporting to the most miserable person in the office.no



__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1258
Date:

Tara and Nicola lost 7-5 4-6 2-6 cry

Harriet and Katy lost 1-6 3-6 cry



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5134
Date:

The BBC have just reported the facts, I don't think they have been critical at all of Katy just said she did well yesterday beating a player just outside the top 100 and lost today to an even better player with a Wimbledon main draw pedigree. Dans success is acknowledged as is his past achievements and present predicament pretty fair really.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55438
Date:

Brief résumé:

If Katie Swan were an experienced 24 year-old, ranked 200 in the world, one might make comments like "missed too many first serves on key moments" or "second serve too soft" or "didn't play the break points well" or whatever. Because she had her chances and, purely tennis wise, it was actually pretty close.

But given she's 16, practically unranked and with almost zero experience in adults, the girl played brilliantly, there's only praise. A great debut, Katie.

Katy D looked a little lightweight against Hogenkamp which, again, is only to be expected given the ranking difference. But, in Katy style, she hussled and managed to get some momemtum in the second, constructing some nice points round her forehand. The result was never in doubt (in my view) but Katy Did Good.

Tara again showed some great stuff on court. And seemingly she'd hurt (even broken?) her finger - didn;t actually notice it, although I did see that she was slicing nearly all her backhands (but thought that was out of choice as it was quite effective). It was a good fight. Certainly the DFs don't help - although, for instance, she served 3 in one game in the first set which made no difference - lost the game but won the set easily. The other girl also served some shocking DFs on key points. It was all very close and tunred, really, at 3-3 in the third when Tara had lots of points to win that game, and didn't make it, and that really switched the tide. You couldn't call it a match that got away. But Tara was well up to the level and it was a good game, with lots of positive stuff for tara to take from it.

Re the doubles, Harriet still looks lost on a doubles court (as she did at Surbiton), Katy not hugely better - the girls got a bit of court time and hit some nice singles shots but it wasn't a contest. Tara and Nik did well (not sure why tara was on the BH if her finger was stopping her BH, and Nik missed quite a lot of FH returns of serve) - but proper doubles, Larsson played very well, a good game by all.

__________________


Pro player

Status: Offline
Posts: 1109
Date:

Nik S was talking about Tara's broken finger on twitter.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

Thanks so much to all for the commentary and scores - but especially to CD ... really lovely. One feels as if one were there (and given insights one wouldn't have oneself!)

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5134
Date:

Did anyone see Paszek play today, I hear she lost a tiebreak from 6-1 up in the second set. Looks like Katy got her on a good day!

__________________


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 401
Date:

Oakland2002 wrote:

Did anyone see Paszek play today, I hear she lost a tiebreak from 6-1 up in the second set. Looks like Katy got her on a good day!


Did not see her play but I know she is on the comeback trail after a long spell out due to injury. That's why I thought Katie had good odds against her. She probably got her on a day when she could put some of her game together.  



__________________
«First  <  110 11 12 13  >  Last»  | Page of 13  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard