Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 20 - Roland Garros women's qualifying
Jan


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 7959
Date:
Week 20 French Open Qualifying - Women


Steven has tweeted:

"RolandGarros Q: @JoKonta91 draws Jovana Jaki SRB WR 241 (CH 102, 2014) in QR1; @NaomiBroady gets Çala Büyükakçay TUR WR 140 (CH 108, Feb)"



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 34418
Date:
Week 20 - Roland Garros women's qualifying


QR1: Johanna Konta WR 144 v Jovana Jaksic (SRB) WR 241 (CH 102 in 2014)

Seeds in section: (q7) Kulichkova (RUS) & (q17) Larcher de Brito (POR)

 

QR1: Naomi Broady WR 236 v Cagla Buyukakcay (TUR) WR 140 (CH 108 in Feb)

Seeds in section: (q10) Glushko (ISR) & (q14) Kucova (SVK)



__________________

GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!

GB top 25s (ranks, whereabouts) & stats - http://www.britishtennis.net/stats.html



Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9477
Date:

Not particularly kind draws given that they are against non seeds.

__________________


ATP qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2847
Date:

Hopefully Cagla Buyukakcay doesn't bring her Fed Cup form to Roland Garros

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40947
Date:

Ah, I was thinking why is that name ringing rather a few bells. That's it, Fed Cup bells.

__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1860
Date:

tony_orient wrote:

Hopefully Cagla Buyukakcay doesn't bring her Fed Cup form to Roland Garros


personally I think Naomi will bow out in the first round probably her weakest surface against a player who beat Heather recebtly 



__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2442
Date:

Really good draws for both girls.

Buyukakcay has had a torrid time since the Fed Cup - W2/L7, and picked up 28 points for the 3 months. Carry on at that rate, and she'll be WR 350 before too long.

Jaksic - W/L 6/12 for the year isn't good. She has fallen 132 WR places since this time last year. She'd be lower ranked still without 2x10 ranking points from losing in R1 at both RG and Wimbledon last year.

I don't doubt that both JoKo and Naomi have amply demonstrated the fine British ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, and may again do so here, but their first round draws could hardly be much better. Two unseeded players who are both in desperate form.

Matches 2 and 3 on Court 9.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40947
Date:

The old line about Brits having any particular capacity to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory I rather doubt stands up to much scrutiny. It certainly happens fairly often both for and against like with other nations. Though Jo is one who may not aid our stats much there.

Re Jo and Naomi's QR1 opponents I must admit I'm not up on their general form, just remembering Cagla from the Fed Cup.

__________________


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9477
Date:

wimdledont wrote:

Really good draws for both girls.

Buyukakcay has had a torrid time since the Fed Cup - W2/L7, and picked up 28 points for the 3 months. Carry on at that rate, and she'll be WR 350 before too long.

Jaksic - W/L 6/12 for the year isn't good. She has fallen 132 WR places since this time last year. She'd be lower ranked still without 2x10 ranking points from losing in R1 at both RG and Wimbledon last year.

I don't doubt that both JoKo and Naomi have amply demonstrated the fine British ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, and may again do so here, but their first round draws could hardly be much better. Two unseeded players who are both in desperate form.

Matches 2 and 3 on Court 9.



 I hear you, looking at current form you have a good point. And I agree its not just about pedigree, it's about current form and fitness. And from a British perspective these draws look much kinder after digging deeper.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10691
Date:

Jo's draw is fine but she has a tendency to peak before the GS and then flop in it.

Naomi would struggle against 95% of the field anyway.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6862
Date:

JK tends to play to form, NB is erratic and could suprise anyone on the right day! 

Best to them both :)



__________________


Pro player

Status: Offline
Posts: 1089
Date:

Can't ask for much more in a GS QR1.

__________________


ATP qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2847
Date:

Naomi could have done with it being about 15 degrees warmer than is forecast for tomorrow and so the conditions will make it really hard for her. I think JoKo has a good chance of winning tomorrow though

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2442
Date:

Naomi has played 31 tournaments in the last year, and is actually, despite an apparent (and imho very unfair) reputation for lack of application, keeps up this sort of work-rate most years.

But her last match on a clay-court was Sep '12. Bit rusty on the dusty...

__________________


ATP qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2706
Date:

wimdledont wrote:

Naomi has played 31 tournaments in the last year, and is actually, despite an apparent (and imho very unfair) reputation for lack of application, keeps up this sort of work-rate most years.

But her last match on a clay-court was Sep '12. Bit rusty on the dusty...


 I have often heard Naomi B criticised for a lack of consistency and success, including via this board, but never for a lack of application.  Indeed, along with EWS, she is recognised as having the tournament schedule of a Duracell bunny year in year out.

She has a high risk game of big shots and almost constant attack.  When she has her range it can be super effective but there is no margin for error on off days.



__________________
1 2 312  >  Last»  | Page of 12  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard