The way we treat migrants is terrible - whether it be Manston, Rwanda (and now other countries) it doesnt feel like a country that represents my values.
Sad.
True, and I whole-heartedly agree.
-- BUT --
We don't exactly make a secret of how we treat migrants (and the fact that the current government wants to treat them even worse, but the law apparently won't let them).
... and still they come.
They avoid domicile in multiple European countries on the way here, knowing that they will be roundly abused and mistreated when they get here. Why is that?
Being reported in the Guardian that Labour have announced they would scrap the House of Lords, if elected, and will replace it with a 2nd elected chamber. I think this is a good move and probably a vote winner.
Yes. And I'm glad that Starmer has woken up and said something, shown a presence, a policy
And the accusation of cronyism is all too true....
Good on him
I would prefer reform. Quite serious reform. But the House of Lords does serve a purpose and I would be concerned if scrapped altogether. This "2nd elected chamber" for example, where will those standing come from, how would it be independent?
I would prefer reform. Quite serious reform. But the House of Lords does serve a purpose and I would be concerned if scrapped altogether. This "2nd elected chamber" for example, where will those standing come from, how would it be independent?
I don't think there's any question of it being scrapped. The proposal is a reform.
It will be a second chamber, an upper house, like most countries have, and just like it was already, but it will be an elected upper house, not one appointed in return for favours, as currently is the case.
I would prefer reform. Quite serious reform. But the House of Lords does serve a purpose and I would be concerned if scrapped altogether. This "2nd elected chamber" for example, where will those standing come from, how would it be independent?
I agree that there are a lot of details to be ironed out, but as you say, it does need to change. It would be interesting to see it be based on PR as opposed to FPTP, which might give new political parties a chance to get a foothold into the political system.
I would prefer reform. Quite serious reform. But the House of Lords does serve a purpose and I would be concerned if scrapped altogether. This "2nd elected chamber" for example, where will those standing come from, how would it be independent?
I agree that there are a lot of details to be ironed out, but as you say, it does need to change. It would be interesting to see it be based on PR as opposed to FPTP, which might give new political parties a chance to get a foothold into the political system.
That would have worked well when UKIP was in its pomp.
So former Tory MP, Owen Paterson, who campaigned to have the UK end its association with the ECHR before being sacked for breaches of lobbying rules (despite Johnson's attempt to protect him by changing the rules), is now claiming the UK government breached his privacy and he is trying to sue the government - through the ECHR.
I would prefer reform. Quite serious reform. But the House of Lords does serve a purpose and I would be concerned if scrapped altogether. This "2nd elected chamber" for example, where will those standing come from, how would it be independent?
I agree that there are a lot of details to be ironed out, but as you say, it does need to change. It would be interesting to see it be based on PR as opposed to FPTP, which might give new political parties a chance to get a foothold into the political system.
What any new system should aim for, is that party politics plays no part in a 2nd chamber surely?
I would prefer reform. Quite serious reform. But the House of Lords does serve a purpose and I would be concerned if scrapped altogether. This "2nd elected chamber" for example, where will those standing come from, how would it be independent?
I agree that there are a lot of details to be ironed out, but as you say, it does need to change. It would be interesting to see it be based on PR as opposed to FPTP, which might give new political parties a chance to get a foothold into the political system.
What any new system should aim for, is that party politics plays no part in a 2nd chamber surely?
Do you not like the current one, then?
Our lords are currently:
257 Tory
184 crossbench
168 Labour
84 Lib Dem
A few dribs and drabs
If you want to get rid of all political affiliation, shh, you must presumably be itching to get rid of the current House of Lords ?
I don't particularly mind political affiliation - I think it might be artificial to say that they all should be politically neutral
The problem is that the people are not elected. That is the key issue, to me, not their political persuasion. When Boris put Lebedev into the House of Lords, who's never been to any session, I believe, my issue is not with Lebedev's politics as such, but that he was just Boris' mate, getting payback, and not a genuine Tory person that people voted in.
Kind of impossible to remove an underlying political affiliation. At least if voted in under a party that is more transparent.
I agree that the real issue is being appointed for loads of dubious reasons rather than elected.
I think t would need some form of PR in case at some time we ended up with both chambers having overwhelming majorities for one party ( either rhe same one with everything getting nodded through or different with everything being blocked ).
-- Edited by indiana on Wednesday 23rd of November 2022 05:09:57 PM