Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: General election/politics


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1814
Date:
RE: General election/politics


JonH comes home wrote:

The way we treat migrants is terrible - whether it be Manston, Rwanda (and now other countries) it doesnt feel like a country that represents my values.

Sad.


 True, and I whole-heartedly agree.

-- BUT --

We don't exactly make a secret of how we treat migrants (and the fact that the current government wants to treat them even worse, but the law apparently won't let them).

... and still they come.

They avoid domicile in multiple European countries on the way here, knowing that they will be roundly abused and mistreated when they get here. Why is that?



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55264
Date:

People live in hope

__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1814
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

People live in hope


 When I was at University in Exeter one of the women's halls of residence was called "Hope Hall". The residents all used to "live in Hope".



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55264
Date:

christ wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:

People live in hope


 When I was at University in Exeter one of the women's halls of residence was called "Hope Hall". The residents all used to "live in Hope".


 Lol biggrin



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41475
Date:

My daughters first name is in fact Hope! She lives as Hope, not just in hope.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19391
Date:

Being reported in the Guardian that Labour have announced they would scrap the House of Lords, if elected, and will replace it with a 2nd elected chamber. I think this is a good move and probably a vote winner.

www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/nov/19/keir-starmer-i-will-abolish-house-of-lords-to-restore-trust-in-politics

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55264
Date:

Yes. And I'm glad that Starmer has woken up and said something, shown a presence, a policy
And the accusation of cronyism is all too true....
Good on him

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2564
Date:

I would prefer reform. Quite serious reform. But the House of Lords does serve a purpose and I would be concerned if scrapped altogether. This "2nd elected chamber" for example, where will those standing come from, how would it be independent?

__________________

 Its really not as bad as they say :)



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55264
Date:

Shhh wrote:

I would prefer reform. Quite serious reform. But the House of Lords does serve a purpose and I would be concerned if scrapped altogether. This "2nd elected chamber" for example, where will those standing come from, how would it be independent?


 I don't think there's any question of it being scrapped. The proposal is a reform. 

It will be a second chamber, an upper house, like most countries have, and just like it was already, but it will be an elected upper house, not one appointed in return for favours, as currently is the case.  

 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19391
Date:

Shhh wrote:

I would prefer reform. Quite serious reform. But the House of Lords does serve a purpose and I would be concerned if scrapped altogether. This "2nd elected chamber" for example, where will those standing come from, how would it be independent?


I agree that there are a lot of details to be ironed out, but as you say, it does need to change.  It would be interesting to see it be based on PR as opposed to FPTP, which might give new political parties a chance to get a foothold into the political system.



__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1814
Date:

Bob in Spain wrote:
Shhh wrote:

I would prefer reform. Quite serious reform. But the House of Lords does serve a purpose and I would be concerned if scrapped altogether. This "2nd elected chamber" for example, where will those standing come from, how would it be independent?


I agree that there are a lot of details to be ironed out, but as you say, it does need to change.  It would be interesting to see it be based on PR as opposed to FPTP, which might give new political parties a chance to get a foothold into the political system.


 That would have worked well when UKIP was in its pomp.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19391
Date:

So former Tory MP, Owen Paterson, who campaigned to have the UK end its association with the ECHR before being sacked for breaches of lobbying rules (despite Johnson's attempt to protect him by changing the rules), is now claiming the UK government breached his privacy and he is trying to sue the government - through the ECHR.

You really couldn't make this stuff up.

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2564
Date:

Bob in Spain wrote:
Shhh wrote:

I would prefer reform. Quite serious reform. But the House of Lords does serve a purpose and I would be concerned if scrapped altogether. This "2nd elected chamber" for example, where will those standing come from, how would it be independent?


I agree that there are a lot of details to be ironed out, but as you say, it does need to change.  It would be interesting to see it be based on PR as opposed to FPTP, which might give new political parties a chance to get a foothold into the political system.


 What any new system should aim for, is that party politics plays no part in a 2nd chamber surely?



__________________

 Its really not as bad as they say :)



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55264
Date:

Shhh wrote:
Bob in Spain wrote:
Shhh wrote:

I would prefer reform. Quite serious reform. But the House of Lords does serve a purpose and I would be concerned if scrapped altogether. This "2nd elected chamber" for example, where will those standing come from, how would it be independent?


I agree that there are a lot of details to be ironed out, but as you say, it does need to change.  It would be interesting to see it be based on PR as opposed to FPTP, which might give new political parties a chance to get a foothold into the political system.


 What any new system should aim for, is that party politics plays no part in a 2nd chamber surely?


 Do you not like the current one, then? 

Our lords are currently:

257 Tory

184 crossbench

168 Labour

84 Lib Dem

A few dribs and drabs

 

If you want to get rid of all political affiliation, shh, you must presumably be itching to get rid of the current House of Lords ?

I don't particularly mind political affiliation - I think it might be artificial to say that they all should be politically neutral 

The problem is that the people are not elected. That is the key issue, to me, not their political persuasion. When Boris put Lebedev into the House of Lords, who's never been to any session, I believe, my issue is not with Lebedev's politics as such, but that he was just Boris' mate, getting payback, and not a genuine Tory person that people voted in.   



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40755
Date:

Kind of impossible to remove an underlying political affiliation. At least if voted in under a party that is more transparent.

I agree that the real issue is being appointed for loads of dubious reasons rather than elected.

I think t would need some form of PR in case at some time we ended up with both chambers having overwhelming majorities for one party ( either rhe same one with everything getting nodded through or different with everything being blocked ).



-- Edited by indiana on Wednesday 23rd of November 2022 05:09:57 PM



__________________
«First  <  117 18 19 20 2143  >  Last»  | Page of 43  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard