Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 19 - Challenger (€50,000+H) - Samarkand, Uzbekistan - red clay


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17425
Date:
RE: Week 19 - Challenger (€50,000+H) - Samarkand, Uzbekistan - red clay


Bambo is back.........

I think there is no coincidence that the change in form has happened with the return to work with Hilts and Liam

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55518
Date:

A sensible and logical analysis . . . I'm still going for the hair though

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4586
Date:

Born2WinTennis wrote:

Wow is that his biggest scalp to date in terms of world ranking?


 I believe it's Guido Pella on grass in Nottingham 2 years ago ranked 80odd I might be wrong though somebody else better than me can confirm.



__________________


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 174
Date:

Great win for Luke! It would be good to see him start to make more regular inroads into chally main draws, that way him and Liam can continue to build what could be a promising doubles partnership without Bambo sacrificing progress in singles. Also, as has been mentioned, being back traveling and training with Liam and Hilton could well be bringing the best out of him, even if it's just put him in a better place mentally being around people he gets on well with.
Of course he's going to have to mix in a few 10ks and 15ks to get his ranking up, but it's good to see him having a go at challys and now seeing some success. I see a fair bit of criticism for Marcus not trying to push on out of the futures circuit, so it's good to see it paying off.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17425
Date:

It will work out quite nicely for now, as i'm sure both will play the grass season in the UK and then it will be dependent on how Liam's ranking progresses.

There is a big financial risk for Luke to play challenger qualifiers week in week out.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58049
Date:

Good effort!

R1:  (2) Sergey Betov & Mikhail Elgin (BLR/RUS) CR 291 (86+205) defeated Luke Bambridge & Liam Broady CR 545 (268+277) by 7-5 3-6 [10-7]

They were even up a mini-break once or twice at the start of the MTB... hmm

*****

QF:  Matt Ebden (AUS) & Brydan Klein CR 464 (255+171) vs (2) Sergey Betov & Mikhail Elgin (BLR/RUS) CR 291 (86+205)



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6985
Date:

Bah

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5134
Date:

Doesn't it depend how Luke is being funded? He played last summer on an American ITF swing with Liam which was the foundation from which Liam started progressing in challengers. I presume the LTA continue to support them both.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55518
Date:

paulisi wrote:

It will work out quite nicely for now, as i'm sure both will play the grass season in the UK and then it will be dependent on how Liam's ranking progresses.

There is a big financial risk for Luke to play challenger qualifiers week in week out.


 

There's an even bigger financial risk if he plays ITF 10ks week in, week out.

 

With a 10k that involves travel and lodging, a player does not break even or make a very meagre profit unless he makes the final/wins the title. It's practically guaranteed to make a loss.

Therefore, from a purely financial point of view, any business model that involves 10ks is fundamentally flawed.

The only value of them is as a means to invest in yourself for the future, by experience and points.

From a business point of view, Luke would be advised to take out a contract with French league tennis, lock into 5 games and about £5,000 - £7,000 of guaranteed earnings (with zero expenses) and use that money to play challengers. The high-earning British Tour events would make sense here too.

How many of our players (since the scrapping of the top-up fund and before the prize money hikes come in) have earned 5k POST-expenses from 10-15ks? My guess would be hardly any (although doubles can help a little). So, why guarantee the loss? Why not play challengers and have the chance to make a profit, and earn money elsewhere to fund it?

 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17425
Date:

Oakland2002 wrote:

Doesn't it depend how Luke is being funded? He played last summer on an American ITF swing with Liam which was the foundation from which Liam started progressing in challengers. I presume the LTA continue to support them both.


 Highly unlikely the LTA fund both. Liam may have some funding, but I doubt Luke has.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17425
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:
paulisi wrote:

It will work out quite nicely for now, as i'm sure both will play the grass season in the UK and then it will be dependent on how Liam's ranking progresses.

There is a big financial risk for Luke to play challenger qualifiers week in week out.


 

There's an even bigger financial risk if he plays ITF 10ks week in, week out.

 

With a 10k that involves travel and lodging, a player does not break even or make a very meagre profit unless he makes the final/wins the title. It's practically guaranteed to make a loss.

Therefore, from a purely financial point of view, any business model that involves 10ks is fundamentally flawed.

The only value of them is as a means to invest in yourself for the future, by experience and points.

From a business point of view, Luke would be advised to take out a contract with French league tennis, lock into 5 games and about £5,000 - £7,000 of guaranteed earnings (with zero expenses) and use that money to play challengers. The high-earning British Tour events would make sense here too.

How many of our players (since the scrapping of the top-up fund and before the prize money hikes come in) have earned 5k POST-expenses from 10-15ks? My guess would be hardly any (although doubles can help a little). So, why guarantee the loss? Why not play challengers and have the chance to make a profit, and earn money elsewhere to fund it?

 


 That argument about 10ks v challenger doesn't wash unless you are hugely talented. There needs to be a balance. There are no points or cash in challenger qualifiers unless you win 3 rounds and there are expenses to boot. With a ranking over 400, you are bound to walk into a tough draw.

For 10ks you should at least be able to pick up some wins, points and prize money to cover some costs.

No issues earning money playing club tennis or British tour to supplement income.

Its all a balancing act unless you have a generous sponsor or governing body.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17425
Date:

Brydan underway and an early break up.

__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 989
Date:

Takes the first set 6-4, good stuff

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2417
Date:

Lost the second 1-6 and was 0-2 in the third, it's now 4-3*

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2417
Date:

Brydan won 6-4 1-6 6-4

That's a cracking result as he really had to dig in. The bookies had him at 5/2 which says a lot about his recent form.

Plays Bambo or Myneni next, which is just about to get underway on the same court.

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5 6  >  Last»  | Page of 6  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard