Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 18 - Challenger (€42,500+H) - Rome, Italy - red clay


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2417
Date:
RE: Week 18 - Challenger (€42,500+H) - Rome, Italy - red clay


Kyle lost the first 6-4... Does anyone know why there was a long heated exchange with the umpire at 30-15 in that game?

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19401
Date:

I think Kyle saw the serve as out. From what I saw, I would think that the umpire was saying that Kyle left his "challenge" too late and so he couldn't come down and look at the mark.

__________________
Jan


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 7963
Date:

Jaffa wrote:

Kyle lost the first 6-4... Does anyone know why there was a long heated exchange with the umpire at 30-15 in that game?


No idea - I wondered that too.

Aside from the one game he was broken, Kyle seems to be holding serve fairly well, so let's be hopeful in the next set!

 

edit - thanks Bob!



-- Edited by Jan on Thursday 7th of May 2015 02:36:44 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19401
Date:

Missed the start of the match. Seems to be very serve dominated. Kyle only lost 5 points on serve in 5 games, but still managed to get broken early on. Never really got a look in on the Starace serve though.

__________________


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 164
Date:

Edmund 3-2 up on serve in the second, both mostly holding serve comfortably. Kyle needs to take his first chance.



-- Edited by KyleM on Thursday 7th of May 2015 03:02:47 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19401
Date:

Still on serve in the 2nd set at 4-3*. Both players have won 47 points each so far.

__________________


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 164
Date:

From essentially nowhere Edmund is broke to love, Starace serving for the match now 4-5*

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19401
Date:

Starace breaks and will serve for the match at *5-4

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2580
Date:

Come on Kedders, I don't often get chance to watch you live, please have some consideration.

__________________


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 164
Date:

Did anyone hear what Kyle was saying to the umpire there?

__________________


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 164
Date:

Break Point Kyle

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58051
Date:

So no fairy-tale all Brit semi:

QF:  (1) Aljaz Bedene WR 89 defeated (6) Taro Daniel (JPN) WR 168 by 2 & 4
QF:  Potito Starace (ITA) WR 221 defeated (4) Kyle Edmund WR 125 by 4 & 4

*****

SF:  (1) Aljaz Bedene WR 89 vs Potito Starace (ITA) WR 221 (CH = 27 in October 2007)

'Twill be interesting to see how Aljaz copes with the wily old Italian clay-courter...



__________________


Admin:Moderator + Tennis Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 12091
Date:

Drat. Missed both matches as I had to go out then sort out a problem with tennistv, which took ages. Well done Aljaz, hard lines Kyle, Starace did look a bit of a banana skin.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19401
Date:

KyleM wrote:

Did anyone hear what Kyle was saying to the umpire there?


No, but I read it like this.  Earlier in the set, the umpire refused Kyle's request to come down and look at the mark saying that Kyle had already played his shot. On this occasion, Starace had put his shot out and yet the umpire went down anyway to look at the mark from Kyle's preceding shot and called it out. I would guess Kyle was complaining about inconsistency.

Of course, we don't know at what moment Starace called "out". He may have done it immediately, but we don't know.

Shame for Kyle.  That's 3 QFs in 3 weeks.  Solid return over this stretch but I am sure he would have hoped to go further on at least one of those occasions. Let's see how he does in Masters Qualies next week.



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5134
Date:

Agh, I understand Kyles frustration with the call, what's not clear to me is had the umpire called it out, or did starace question it and then signal it out only for the umpire to give him the point. Kyle seemed to be dominant in most aspects of his game but was out manoeuvred by an old pro who has made a more than decent career on the dirt. There must be so many lessons to learn from this performance I can't say I am too disheartened by this loss.

__________________
«First  <  14 5 6 7 8 9  >  Last»  | Page of 9  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard