I hope wardy gets there but perhaps he needs a new number the proximity of 100 is part of the problem, really the relevant target is that that gains DE to ATP250s, then 500, then GS and then those that guarantee seeding at 250's, 500's etc....
Top 100 is obviously a psychological thing but it shouldn't really be a goal in itself. Winning an ATP tournament or a good run at a slam would be the kind of things that I think James should be aiming for.
-- Edited by RJA on Wednesday 29th of April 2015 05:49:15 PM
Top 100 and other statistical round numbers are something that many fans look at with clearly top 100 being a biggee.
I'd say that top 100 is highlighted rather more for itsrlf rather than it being just inside the likely DE to Slams cut-off though of course there is some linkage.
And while I would certainly imagine James wants to get that ticked off so that he will be a 'top 100' player I would imagine that we all have no idea what effect his ongoing closeness to the top 100 is having on his play.
I would hope, and actually suspect, very little if any at all and not the particular 'problem' that some appear to think.
I was wondering the other day when james was wr 101 if he didnt have a mandatory 0 counter for wimbledon rd1 loss as a wildcard and his 18th best score counted would he have been top 100? I will have a look later and work it out