Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 11 - ITF ($10k) Jiangmen, China (Hard)


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40950
Date:
RE: Week 11 - ITF ($10k) Jiangmen, China (Hard)


Yes, maybe not normally 6-0 6-0 ( but in this case apparently to an extent ) but a lot of women's scores of the 6-1 and 6-2 variety can really be quite competitive. I remember some discussion regards this in the past, particularly with regard to some Laura Robson matches.

I generally love the tennis scoring system ( including Ads !!! ) but in the women's game, with the general lack of serve domination, you can get really pretty competitive matches where one player is just a bit better on the day and keeps irritatingly winning tight games, leading to a cruel looking scoreline.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:

indiana wrote:

Yes, maybe not normally 6-0 6-0 ( but in this case apparently to an extent ) but a lot of women's scores of the 6-1 and 6-2 variety can really be quite competitive. I remember some discussion regards this in the past, particularly with regard to some Laura Robson matches.

I generally love the tennis scoring system ( including Ads !!! ) but in the women's game, with the general lack of serve domination, you can get really pretty competitive matches where one player is just a bit better on the day and keeps irritatingly winning tight games, leading to a cruel looking scoreline.


I've often thought that there is a stat missing that might help this, to do with break points.
You can see BP, and conversion, but what you miss is how many unused BP a player has, and in how many games BP occurred.
So, if a player takes the first point at 40-0* to break, the 2 unused chances are never logged, but that reserve is an indicator of pressure and the back and forth.
If your match figures are 3/4 and your opponents are 1/9, it seems as though the other player had more pressure, but you could have converted 3 times at 40-0*. Whereas there could have been one epic game back and forth from deuce to account for all 9 BP (unlikely, but I use an extreme example to highlight the effect).

Things like this would, I believe, help to give a more rounded picture of a match, and is not subjective like UE counts.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40950
Date:

Interesting.

Re your BP exanple, I have too in the past thought how much one could potentially get a very misleading perspective on a match from BP stats.

Looking at your example, say player X loses a match 6-4 6-4 and has BP conversion stats of 1/9 ( and opponent player Y 3/4 ) the tempation might be to think, even suggest, that it's these important BPs that have cost player X the match.

But us you say, all 9 of X's BPs could have been in the one game she broke in and that the only game she really threatened to break in. Player Y meantime clearly broke in 3 games and may even have had a BP chance in a 4th, if all 3 were first time conversions, and also some could have been at 0-40 or 15-40 so Y may have had big pressure and had 'spares'.

Suddenly a quite different complexion on proceedings ...

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18106
Date:

QF: DART, Harriet (GBR) 2 409 beat CHRISTIE, Freya (GBR) SE 865 6-2 6-2

SF: DART, Harriet (GBR) 2 409 v XU, Shilin (CHN) 533 CH=403 Dec 2014, 17yo JCH=1

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4096
Date:

Keep going now please Harriet :)

Looks a tricky one though furious



-- Edited by vohor on Thursday 19th of March 2015 11:47:42 AM

__________________


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 401
Date:

A bit surprised with the outcome of Freya's match with Harriet. Was expecting a closer match especially with Freya's quick-fire win against Anna.



__________________


ATP qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2706
Date:

Expected Harriet to win, mainly because she's had a lot more recent match experience but thought it would be a fair bit closer.



__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2442
Date:

Harriet won, with Xu retiring after losing the first set.

She is now past the 400 barrier in the WTA rankings, overtaking Naomi C among others - Brit number 9.

Freya should also move up to around 750, tied with Jade W for Brit 19.

Good luck in the final.



-- Edited by wimdledont on Friday 20th of March 2015 03:24:55 AM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55500
Date:

Congrats to Harriet. Into the final !

Will play Liu, top seed, in the final. But she only won her semi 6-4 in the third.

Good luck, Harriet.

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4096
Date:

Great stuff Harriet; GL in the final :)

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40950
Date:

SF: (2) Harriet Dart WR 409 beat Shilin Xu (CHN) WR 533 (CH 403 12/14) 6-3 retired

F: (2) Harriet Dart WR 409 vs (1) Chang Liu (CHN) WR 382 (CH 336 01/13)

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10691
Date:

And Xu is the current junior #2 (former #1). So a decent scalp even if she got a bit of luck with the retirement!

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40950
Date:

I've been very pleasantly surprised by how well Harriet has done in the last year. She has really pushed on.

Good stuff and good luck in the final.

__________________


Masters Series Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 3790
Date:

Good stuff. Shame about the way it happened.

Hopefully she can win the title

__________________

Good luck Team GBR in 2016!!!



Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2442
Date:

Shucks!

Harriet lost 6-3, 6-0 in the final.

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4  >  Last»  | Page of 4  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard