Yes, maybe not normally 6-0 6-0 ( but in this case apparently to an extent ) but a lot of women's scores of the 6-1 and 6-2 variety can really be quite competitive. I remember some discussion regards this in the past, particularly with regard to some Laura Robson matches.
I generally love the tennis scoring system ( including Ads !!! ) but in the women's game, with the general lack of serve domination, you can get really pretty competitive matches where one player is just a bit better on the day and keeps irritatingly winning tight games, leading to a cruel looking scoreline.
Yes, maybe not normally 6-0 6-0 ( but in this case apparently to an extent ) but a lot of women's scores of the 6-1 and 6-2 variety can really be quite competitive. I remember some discussion regards this in the past, particularly with regard to some Laura Robson matches.
I generally love the tennis scoring system ( including Ads !!! ) but in the women's game, with the general lack of serve domination, you can get really pretty competitive matches where one player is just a bit better on the day and keeps irritatingly winning tight games, leading to a cruel looking scoreline.
I've often thought that there is a stat missing that might help this, to do with break points. You can see BP, and conversion, but what you miss is how many unused BP a player has, and in how many games BP occurred. So, if a player takes the first point at 40-0* to break, the 2 unused chances are never logged, but that reserve is an indicator of pressure and the back and forth. If your match figures are 3/4 and your opponents are 1/9, it seems as though the other player had more pressure, but you could have converted 3 times at 40-0*. Whereas there could have been one epic game back and forth from deuce to account for all 9 BP (unlikely, but I use an extreme example to highlight the effect).
Things like this would, I believe, help to give a more rounded picture of a match, and is not subjective like UE counts.
Re your BP exanple, I have too in the past thought how much one could potentially get a very misleading perspective on a match from BP stats.
Looking at your example, say player X loses a match 6-4 6-4 and has BP conversion stats of 1/9 ( and opponent player Y 3/4 ) the tempation might be to think, even suggest, that it's these important BPs that have cost player X the match.
But us you say, all 9 of X's BPs could have been in the one game she broke in and that the only game she really threatened to break in. Player Y meantime clearly broke in 3 games and may even have had a BP chance in a 4th, if all 3 were first time conversions, and also some could have been at 0-40 or 15-40 so Y may have had big pressure and had 'spares'.
Suddenly a quite different complexion on proceedings ...