Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 10 - ATP Masters 1000 - Indian Wells, CA, USA (JW & doubles)- Hard


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 507
Date:
RE: Week 10 - ATP Masters 1000 - Indian Wells, CA, USA (JW & doubles)- Hard


Julia Carrot wrote:
BeefyDeedz wrote:

Andy is playing dubs with Kokkinakis.


 I like that.


 

 yes, I do too.



__________________



Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9477
Date:

Cream Crackered by the looks of it, always going to be a tough ask, what he could done with a week in between.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40977
Date:

Disappointing.

But, James, still won't be forgetting last Friday in a hurry !

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4586
Date:

Fact is James is a perennial ranked 85-200 player he could break the top 100 by luck like a few have but hasn't got the game to be any higher. I stand by my predictuon Brydan and will finish above James this year and is an all round better player.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

indiana wrote:

Disappointing.

But, James, still won't be forgetting last Friday in a hurry !


Nor will the USA. In Jon Wertheim's "Mailbag" for this week, someone writes in to ask whether Andy Roddick could come out of retirement to beat "Jimmy" Ward in a best-of-five match!

No shock in the defeat under the circumstances. Hope he can now get a little rest and prepare for his next tournaments.



__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2012
Date:

How is the ll situation?

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2417
Date:

I'd actually be surprised if he signs in for a LL place, why not rest and save yourself for Irving next week, higher chance of points there.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 34418
Date:

freerider wrote:

How is the ll situation?


Daniel Gimeno-Traver and James were the highest seeds to lose in the FQR. Under the new ATP rules, there would must have been a random draw between them for the first LL place, which DGT must have won, because he is already in. James should be next in line though, should he want to play.



__________________

GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!

GB top 25s (ranks, whereabouts) & stats - http://www.britishtennis.net/stats.html



All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

I should imagine he would: he's not even in Irvine yet, is he?

__________________


Admin:Moderator + Tennis Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 12091
Date:

What a pity. I really hope he has a good run wherever he plays next, he deserves it.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40977
Date:

I probably had similar thoughts in the past as jaggy about James being generally in a perennial rankings range and that he would probably be "lucky" to make the top 100.

But how in the last year he has got himself to the cusp of the top 100 ( best WR 101 in January ) , with his previous best prior to last August being WR 137, has certainly not been by luck.

As various people have commented over the last year, James has become much more consistent from match to match and tournament to tournament.

An indication of this consistency is that, unlike many similarly ranked players, his ranking is not largely influenced by big ranking points outliers, sometimes obtained in rather fortunate looking circumstances.

For, in James updated total of 516 ranking points, he has only one score above 50 and that is 70 from last year's Cincinnati Masters where he qualified and beat two top 100 players prior to beating Garcia-Lopez, WR 32, in the last 64.

The final points that James will hopefully get to edge him over that top 100 line might yet turn out to have an element of luck about them ( he has arguably had some bad luck in not already having done it, as is likely with someone who who has got so close ). However, how he has got to the position he is currently in is by upping his overall game, not by luck.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

Agreed. And it was interesting to read some non-UK commentators on the Isner game, all of whom noted that Ward's game - and especially his movement - had improved significantly. (Of course, had they read the discussions on this board, this would not have come as a surprise!)

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58040
Date:

Andy getting his eye & keeping his hand in!

R1:  (WC) Thanasi Kokkinakis (AUS) & Andy Murray CR 710 (287+423) defeated (4) Jean-Julien Rojer & Horia Tecau (NED/ROU) CR 18 (9+9) by 3 & 5  biggrin



__________________


Admin:Moderator + Tennis Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 12091
Date:

Should have helped him getting used to the climate, surface and balls. The balls particularly are very different to those used in the DC, I understand.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17425
Date:

A big server and a top returner should make a decent pair. Must be quite decent to take out the four seeds.

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5 6 7  >  Last»  | Page of 7  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard