Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 5 - Challenger (€42,500) - The Scottish Championships, Glasgow (indoor hard)


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17425
Date:
RE: Week 5 - Challenger (€42,500) - The Scottish Championships, Glasgow (indoor hard)


Caught a bit of Ewan Moore's match having not seen him before.

He has a nice game and likes to come to the net, but just lacked weight of shot and a bit of court management, but that will come with experience. Plenty of promise.

__________________


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 507
Date:


not sure I really like seeing 2 Brits playing each other in a Challenger and don't know what to say other than I wouldn't mind if it were the final. so, good luck to Ed in the next round and commiserations to Alex and Ewan.

Good day though :)

__________________



Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58051
Date:

QF:  Dan Cox & Dave Rice CR 569 (358+211) vs Wesley Koolhof & Matwé Middelkoop (NED/NED) CR 449 (193+256)



__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1432
Date:

Marcus previously lifted the glasgow futures title so happy memories of Scotland's 2nd City but arguably it's best ! 

I know the LTA have restablished the surbiton tournament as a pre Wimbledon challenger .  More GB challengers would be a boost to our players and a step in the right direction 



__________________
Gary Lewis


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40982
Date:

Ha Ha, you may have saved yourself with Glaswegians after calling Glasgow Scotland's 2nd city :)

__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1432
Date:

I have always preferred Glasgow and it's people to the Capital edinburgh 



__________________
Gary Lewis


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55521
Date:

Worth noting (LTA, coaches or whoever) that of the three players who yesterday got through to the second round of a 50k Challenger (all in two sets and with two wins against top200 players), one of them (Marcus) lost in the first round of a 10k last week, one of them (Ed) lost in the second round of a 10k last week, and one of them (Dan S) lost in the QF of a 10K last week.

Admittedly, there were better results the week before. But the point being that you don't need to be nailing 10ks in order to compete well at Challengers and you have to raise the bar for the players to raise their game.

__________________
RJA


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9639
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

Worth noting (LTA, coaches or whoever) that of the three players who yesterday got through to the second round of a 50k Challenger (all in two sets and with two wins against top200 players), one of them (Marcus) lost in the first round of a 10k last week, one of them (Ed) lost in the second round of a 10k last week, and one of them (Dan S) lost in the QF of a 10K last week.

Admittedly, there were better results the week before. But the point being that you don't need to be nailing 10ks in order to compete well at Challengers and you have to raise the bar for the players to raise their game.


It also helps when you draw Italians who (especially in the case of Viola) prefer a nice slow clay court to a fast indoor hard court.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55521
Date:

RJA wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:

Worth noting (LTA, coaches or whoever) that of the three players who yesterday got through to the second round of a 50k Challenger (all in two sets and with two wins against top200 players), one of them (Marcus) lost in the first round of a 10k last week, one of them (Ed) lost in the second round of a 10k last week, and one of them (Dan S) lost in the QF of a 10K last week.

Admittedly, there were better results the week before. But the point being that you don't need to be nailing 10ks in order to compete well at Challengers and you have to raise the bar for the players to raise their game.


It also helps when you draw Italians who (especially in the case of Viola) prefer a nice slow clay court to a fast indoor hard court.


 

Indeed, But we can't say that all the victories are a fluke. Or even just lucky. A retirement is a fluke; a victory isn't. After all, there are lots of guys in the top 200 who prefer nice slow clay courts. And they all have to play indoor hard tournaments. So someone has to draw them every time.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40982
Date:

Verging at least on challenger level Brits + British challengers = Challenger wins for Brits

OK, not exactly guaranteed, but ..

__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1432
Date:

Anyone know B & B doubles score ? 

In Mexico and can only get final score 



__________________
Gary Lewis


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19401
Date:

A1 tennis academy wrote:

Anyone know B & B doubles score ? 

In Mexico and can only get final score 


Not played yet. Still 3 more singles matches to be played before they even start so it's going to be a while.

PS. Hello Mexico from Brazil smile



__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2012
Date:

Milton loses first set 6-1. Serve still looks a bit dodgy

__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2012
Date:

lost 1 & 1. score a bit flattering to Reister. Milton just struggled to hold serve. seems to have beefed the serve up a bit but still vulnerable. can't see how he got 15 aces in fqr.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17425
Date:

I thought Dan C was the banker of the Brits in round 1, but he seems to be struggling to hold serve at present. He's a battler though 4-3* up

__________________
«First  <  110 11 12 13 1422  >  Last»  | Page of 22  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard