Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Link Back -> Andrew Murray message board -> British men discussion section -> 2015 - A Good Year/A Bad Year?
Post Info TOPIC: 2015 - A Good Year/A Bad Year?
BeefyDeedz


Pro player

Status: Offline
Posts: 1089
Date:
RE: 2015 - A Good Year/A Bad Year?
Permalink  

In terms of satiating my own want to support players in Challengers and ATP events, 7/8 in the top 20 would be fantastic. However, it would probably be a healthier make up come the end of 2015 if there were 20+ in the top 500.

__________________
The Optimist


ATP qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2706
Date:
Permalink  

BeefyDeedz wrote:

In terms of satiating my own want to support players in Challengers and ATP events, 7/8 in the top 20 would be fantastic. However, it would probably be a healthier make up come the end of 2015 if there were 20+ in the top 500.

 Too **$* right !!



__________________
BeefyDeedz


Pro player

Status: Offline
Posts: 1089
Date:
Permalink  

You never know The Optimist, it could happen!

__________________
Vandenburg


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2016
Date:
Permalink  

My early predictions for 2015

Murray- 8
Ward- 110
Broady- 140
Edmund- 150
Evans-180
Goodall-341
Bogdanovic-352
Bloomfield-534
Slabinksy-962
Mackin- 1104
Howe- 1531

thoughts?

__________________

World renowned expert in Nordic tennis. 
freerider


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2012
Date:
Permalink  

Rob dee to make a singles comeback would constitute a good year

__________________
A1 tennis academy


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1432
Date:
Permalink  

2 players in top 100 = good 

3 players in top 100 = excellent 

 

continued increase in average ranking of top 25 

, A1 Pharmaceuticals successfully retain the national Aegon title  ( personal goal ) , davis cup better run than 2014 

 



__________________
Gary Lewis
Oakland2002


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5134
Date:
Permalink  

Interesting comment from Paulisi re Joe Salisbury, isn't it interesting the number of ex college boys who end up as doubles specialists which I suppose is inevitable given the disproportionate value it has to college sporting success when compared to the professional game.

__________________
freerider


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2012
Date:
Permalink  

From a non rankings point of view surely we should have more home challengers scheduled this year - thst would mean lta tournament planners having a good 2015



-- Edited by freerider on Saturday 22nd of November 2014 07:27:13 AM

__________________
Smidster


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2446
Date:
Permalink  

freerider wrote:

From a non rankings point of view surely we should have more home challengers scheduled this year - thst would mean lta tournament planners having a good 2015



-- Edited by freerider on Saturday 22nd of November 2014 07:27:13 AM

 Depends which way you look at it. 

 

More challengers, which I agree is likely, also means many fewer futures events so harder to get that first rung on the ladder. 

Guess it means more travel for the players!



__________________
«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
Link Back -> Andrew Murray message board -> British men discussion section -> 2015 - A Good Year/A Bad Year?
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard