A few years ago I thought she would be the 'next one'. Hopefully, she at least ultimately does better, whereever her tennis / career takes her than many 'next ones'.
A couple of Brits represented their colleges in the Womens National Indoor Championships last weekend. These are contested between the 16 top teams nationally. Format is three x 1 set doubles matches, 1 point for the first team to 2 matches; 6 x 3-set singles matches, 1 point for each win. Tie abandoned when one team has 4 points.
R1
Rebecca Smaller, playing at 5 for Duke bt Seda Arantekin TCU 4-6, 6-1, 6-0 (WTA UNR, CH 786)
Georgina Sellyn playing at 6 for Vanderbilt lost to Cecilia Estlander CAL 6-0, 3-6, 1-6 (WTA UNR, CH 956)
Consolation R1
Rebecca Smaller at 4 v Astra Sharma VANDY 6-7(7), 5-5 unfinished (WTA UNR, CH 969)
Georgina Sellyn at 6 lost to Annie Mulholland DUKE 4-6, 1-6 (WTA UNR, JWR CH 93)
Consolation R2
Rebecca Smaller at 5 lost to Luicelena Perez ALABAMA 5-7, 6-3 (WTA UNR JWR CH 221)
Men are playing this weekend
So far:
R1
#41 Farris Gosea, playing at 1 for Illinois v #42 Andre Goransson CAL 6-2, 5-4 unfinished (ATP UNR, CH 1652)
#18 Cameron Norrie playing at 1 for TCU lost to Mitchell Frank VIRGINA 3-6, 4-6 (ATP 583, CH 503)
R2
#41 Farris Gosea, at 1 lost to #17 Wayne Montgomery GEORGIA 6-1, 3-6, 6-7(3) (ATP UNR, CH 971)
Consolation R1
#18 Cameron Norrie, at 1 lost to #9 Nicolas Alvarez 6-4, 5-7, 3-6 (ATP 1722, CH 1661)
Final rounds being played today. Will update later on.
There's also a nice clip of Farris from a college match a couple of weeks ago, if any of you haven't seen him play (Farris is in orange):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4kCXTu6A2A
-- Edited by The Optimist on Sunday 15th of February 2015 11:34:24 AM
It seems to be easier now for pre-college students to manage their finances and not risk their amateur status. They don't need to link finances to expenses but can earn up to 10k a year. This will help all the teenagers who are playing and haven't decided whether to go to college or not.
(Note: It doesn't affect the actual college players, who still have the same rules)
USTA Amateur Reimbursement Procedures
A prospective student-athletes is defined as someone who has not yet graduated from high school, but hopes to attend a college or university and compete on an intercollegiate tennis team
1. Prospective Student-Athletes(PSA) no long have to declare amateur status before event
2. PSA is allowed to receive up to $10,000 per calendar year
3. Non-American PSA WILL have the appropriate tax withheld from his/her prize money
4. PSA does not have to complete a Prospective Student-Athlete form until he/she has reached the $10,000 limit. It is the responsibility of the PSA to inform the supervisor when he/she has reached the limit and then the PSA must fill out the form and receive only monies for actual and necessary expenses. (Allowable expenses are listed on the back of the PSA form).
Currently Enrolled Student-Athletes (SA)
A student-athlete is defined as someone who has enrolled in a college or university and is participating on an intercollegiate tennis team. If a player has taken time off before completing eligibility, and wishes to remain eligible to return to college, this player will still be considered a student-athlete
1. Must complete the SA form for every event. The maximum prize money amount an individual can receive is based on round reached provided this amount does not exceed actual and necessary expenses. (Allowable expenses are listed on the back of the SA form).
2. The SA may count all days while competing in the event. NOTE: "While competing in the event" would normally mean that reimbursement may begin once the participant arrives on-site and registers for the event and would include the day(s) of competition, day(s) in between competition, as well as a day prior to and after the competition for traveling purposes, so 2 extra days for expenses.
3. NO tax will be withheld for any currently enrolled student-athlete
Farris Gosea has been indefinitely suspended (ie dismissed) from his Illinois college tennis team. Rumour has it that it is due to disciplinary matters rather than eligibility issues, but no idea how true that is.
Let's hope so, but it is extremely unusual for the No 1 player in a team, esp one of Farris' ability, to be dismissed just at the start of the most important part of the competition season. I suspect it must have been a very major bit of rule breaking. Shame because this is his senior year when they make a big deal of thanking and honouring players for their contribution.