Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Neil Harman - Plagiarist


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:
RE: Neil Harman - Plagiarist


Yes, I did see it. In honesty, I don't think either came off well. Mr Rothenberg's defense of the player and his point that you shouldn't in effect copy a player in when you're making negative comments about them was fair and right (and would that more people observed his strictures!), but his tone in accusing Mr Flatman of "baseless trolling comments" wasn't. And while Mr Flatman's loyalty to his colleague would make the tone of Mr Rothenberg's accusation particularly difficult to take from that source (I myself found Mr Rothenberg's enthusiasm for his story on Harman a bit difficult to take - far preferred Jon Wertheim's more measured assessment), Mr Flatman didn't help matters by being deliberately condescending and insulting. Mutual apologies, anyone?

__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1432
Date:

Can't help feeling that along the way Neil Harman trod on someone's toes and someone plotted to bring him down   . I personally don't draw any satisfaction in witnessing the demise of any ones career . In the computer age with cut & paste it's easily done .



__________________
Gary Lewis


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40760
Date:

Gary, what Neil was doing on such a scale he had to be very well aware of what he was routinely doing. I would expect anyone looking seriously into the evidence would conclude this.

It didn't need a "plot", he offered himself up, he committed the 'crime' year after year. One can debate how much he has and should suffer, but he was absolutely banged to rights.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10639
Date:

Flatman totally missed the point, it wasn't even Ben that broke the Harman story anyway, and Neil assassinated himself.

Flatman's statement that he didn't understand the "nuance" of tagging was a total joke, he's been on twitter 5 years and uses it very frequently. He knew full well that if you @ someone in a tweet they can see it. And as Kevin Anderson's wife points out, they do see them, even if you think they are too highly ranked to be bothering with social media themselves, not that many will have a 'team' to deal with that in the way say Sharapova does.

And his comment was totally baseless anyway, Pliskova has had a brilliant 6 weeks and totally dismantled her ranking in an incredible fashion, lack of heart in big moments is certainly not an accusation you can levy her way!

Ben's posting of the DM was a bit immature but then the way he was spoken to by Barry was so pathetic and unprofessional and patronising I can see why he would have found it hard to resist. It just showed Flatman up more.

Sadly there is a huge old boys network feel to sports journalism in this country and many still think Neil did nothing wrong. As someone of the more modern generation who 'gets' social media it's not a big surprise most of the support from tennis fans is on Ben's side. Particularly given Flatman's long-standing position on being derogatory to womens' tennis.



-- Edited by PaulM on Tuesday 24th of February 2015 12:32:53 PM

__________________


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9477
Date:

I have to say I'm not a big fan of either of them.

Flatman in particular comes across as a sexist, lacking knowledge of the WTA, rude and very old fashioned.

Rothenberg used to be one of my favourites but the whistle blowing role he is now performing, dobbing in journalists from the same profession seems to me beyond his role, in other words he should just stay out of it. I think he's become too big for his boots, a bit too ****y and arrogant for my liking. I remember straight after the Harman story was made public, I tweeted him about a stat about how the Americans were performing at the US open, and just 2 minutes later a tweet came from him basically repeating exactly what I'd written. I thought well that's a bit hypocritical, on the one hand condemming Harman for plagiarising the Wimby annual book and not referencing other journalists, and then not giving me any credit for my stat by basically copying my tweet. I'm a big fan of Courtney Nguyen his partner in crime, she's wittier and stays out of other people's business.

As for Harman he deserved a hefty penalty for what he did, but at what stage has he been punished enough. Compared to Flatman he's a saint and I for one would prefer him to the aforementioned all day long, one of Andy M's biggest supporters and not a bad egg really I don't think. Mike Dickson is another who I've actually had some interaction with and never warmed to.


__________________
RJA


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9639
Date:

philwrig wrote:

As for Harman he deserved a hefty penalty for what he did, but at what stage has he been punished enough. Compared to Flatman he's a saint and I for one would prefer him to the aforementioned all day long, one of Andy M's biggest supporters and not a bad egg really I don't think. Mike Dickson is another who I've actually had some interaction with and never warmed to.


 Sorry but there is no way back for the old fraud. For a supposedly serious journalist reputation is everything and his reputation is permanently trashed.



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6109
Date:

I saw a bit of a ding dong on line about Jake Humphrey using someone elses tweeted stats in a very mildly reworded tweet of his own and then getting called out for plagiarising the original tweet by Stuart Fraser among others Poor show from Humphrey who appears to have form

mobile.twitter.com/sportingintel/status/1103084188494954496

 

https://mobile.twitter.com/stu_fraser

Anyway, that aside, it made me wonder about Neil Harman - anyone know what he does these days, presumably he isnt involved in tennis at all? I used to like his writing, sad he threw it all away. But presumably he is doing some sort of work these days, presumably just not mainstream media?



-- Edited by JonH on Wednesday 6th of March 2019 05:30:29 PM

__________________
JonH


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2564
Date:

As I remember Neil posted on here a few times. Old Echo Man he was known as (he started out on Southends Evenings Echo). He seemed a very decent bloke (and I am sure is) but had a fall from grace as we know and you're right Jon, disappeared from sight.

__________________

 Its really not as bad as they say :)



County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 828
Date:

He's an active enough Tweeter on which he's expressed his deep desire to return as a fully-functioning member of the fouth estate.

__________________


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
Date:

From his Twitter description|

'Author: Gambling for Life with Harry Findlay, 2017. Media consultant'

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40760
Date:

How to gamble on plagiarising and not get away with it...



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19392
Date:

Here is an interview by Soto Tennis with Neil Harman giving his side of the story. I haven't listened to it all as it is 90 mins long.

podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/control-the-controllables/id1511047964

Edit

The issue of plagiarism starts at the 1 hr 4 minute mark.

To sum it up in a nutshell, he accepts he made mistakes but says that it was in error and not intentional. Basically down to time pressure he missed some accreditations of other people.



-- Edited by Bob in Spain on Sunday 9th of August 2020 06:56:01 PM

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 | Page of 3  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard