Sorry: I was in no way casting aspersions on Mr Edmund or Mr Evans, though reading back, I can see how it read that way. Nor would I wish either of them ill - whether absolute or comparative - as would be clear from other posts on the board at other points. But while in no way wishing bad draws on the others, I am sorry that the players who have had so little support should have such tough draws. I should simply have left it at that.
I was already thinking even before your post that I had worded my previous post badly, and in fact was pretty sure you didn't wish "comparative ill" or indeed any sort of ill on Kyle or Evo.
As you make even clearer, it was more feeling sorry for the other guys re their draw.
I think I had been building to this with some of the phraseology at times used on the forum regarding Kyle, when he himself seems a nice, level headed guy.
Sorry: I was in no way casting aspersions on Mr Edmund or Mr Evans, though reading back, I can see how it read that way. Nor would I wish either of them ill - whether absolute or comparative - as would be clear from other posts on the board at other points. But while in no way wishing bad draws on the others, I am sorry that the players who have had so little support should have such tough draws. I should simply have left it at that.
I suppose we all have a tendency to focus on the bad draws and forget the good ones. In the case of Dan Smethurst he has had a pretty good draw in his last 4 challengers and at Eastbourne qualifying. Furthermore the catalyst for his good run this season seems to have been his SF in the Champaign challenger last November when he had a very friendly draw. Obviously a better draw here would have been nice but in the grand scheme of things a run of good challenger draws is probably preferable than a good Wimbledon draw especially as Dan would be under dog against at least 95% of the field. It's similar with Coxy, he has some nice draws this year in challengers and had a decent draw at Queen's. Meanwhile Kyle has had three tough draws in a row so was probably due a more friendly one.
Would be great to see Kyle get his first Wimbledon MD win and a good chance for him to do so. Hope Evo can have a good run too otherwise I fear it will soon be back to the low 200s in the rankings for him.
On the Wimbledon website fantasy game, Kyle's opponents is one of the most expensive when picking your return of server. Suggests excellent returner. Kyle will have to serve well.
Youzhny has had injury problems for much of the year so Ward might have half a chance. Can't see Smethy or Cox having a sniff. Great draw for Evo and Kyle.
I saw Youzhny playing live in Rome against Nadal, he put in real trouble Nadal and it was on the clay... worst surface for Youzhny and best for Nadal.
I think that James Ward has no chance to pass this turn, but I hope to be wrong. He has to play a great match at his best.
Surprised to see people suggest Smethurst has no chance at all. Yes Isner will be dangerous to anyone on grass with his serve but I can see Dan pushing for a few tiebreaks hopefully and then who knows...
Cox has a bad draw and will struggle to take a set
The Ward match will be interesting but if he is losing to Donald Young 2 and 3 then he really has no chance here
Evans and Edmund really need to take advantage of them draws!
I'm surprised it's not closer to 50:50. The current odds imply the following chances of surviving R1:
93% Andy 65% Kyle 39% DanE 25% James 9% DanC 7% DanS
They total 237%, i.e. between 2 and 3 getting through.
Ah betting odds, something I know a little about.
As per usual the mainly British bookmakers unsurprisingly shortening the price of the British player at Wimby. These odds would be fine if Wimby provided a big home advantage, but as we have seen in many years prior, the weight of expectation/pressure often has an impact in a negative way.
Based on those odds Evo looks like the best value even with a dodgy knee.