Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Entries Week 26 - 23/06/2014


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9277
Date:
Entries Week 26 - 23/06/2014


ATP

Wimbledon Week 1 (Grass) - Andy Murray, Dan Evans, James Ward, Dan Cox, Dan Smethurst, Kyle Edmund 

 

 

CHALLENGERS

Padova $50K (Clay) - (Ward A, Pauffley)

 

FUTURES

Spain F15 $15K+H (Hard) - (Short)

USA F17 $15K (Hard) - Daniel Manlow

USA F18 $10K (Clay) - Liam Broady, Ashley Hewitt, Luke Bambridge, Toby Martin (Boone)

 

WTA

Wimbledon Week 1 (Grass) - Jo Konta, Heather Watson, Naomi Broady, Sam Murray, Tara Moore 

Egypt $10K (Hard) - Daniella Konotopseva, Lauren McMinn

Mexico $10K (Hard) - Laura Deigman

USA $10K (Clay) - (Folland)

Spain $10K (Hard) - Manisha Foster, Jazzamay Drew (Thomas)

 



-- Edited by seagull on Thursday 19th of June 2014 09:28:44 AM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 40604
Date:

Good idea Lisa planning on competing in the Egypt 10K(s) as someone said in another thread would be a good starter for her ( still not clear if she will compete in bigger grass tournament qualifying first ).

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2417
Date:

British Wildcards announced:

EVENT 1: GENTLEMENS SINGLES
1 BAGHDATIS, Marcos (CYP)
2 COX, Daniel (GBR)
3 EDMUND, Kyle (GBR)
4 EVANS, Daniel (GBR)
5 SMETHURST, Daniel (GBR)
6 WARD, James (GBR)
7 To be announced
8 To be announced

EVENT 2: GENTLEMENS DOUBLES
1 EVANS, Daniel (GBR) and WARD, James (GBR)
2 FLEMING, Colin (GBR) and HUTCHINS, Ross (GBR)
3 SKUPSKI, Ken (GBR) and SKUPSKI, Neal (GBR)
4 To be announced
5 To be announced
6 To be announced
7 To be announced

EVENT 3: LADIES SINGLES
1 BROADY, Naomi (GBR)
2 MOORE, Tara (GBR)
3 MURRAY, Samantha (GBR)
4 PLISKOVA, Kristyna (CZE)
5 To be announced
6 To be announced
7 To be announced
8 To be announced

EVENT 4: LADIES DOUBLES
1 BROADY, Naomi (GBR) and DANIILIDOU, Eleni (GRE)
2 HINGIS, Martina (SUI) and ZVONAREVA, Vera (RUS)
3 KONTA, Johanna (GBR) and MOORE, Tara (GBR)
4 RAE, Jocelyn (GBR) and SMITH, Anna (GBR)
5 To be announced
6 To be announced
7 To be announced

QUALIFYING GENTLEMENS SINGLES
1 CORRIE, Edward (GBR)
2 GOLDING, Oliver (GBR)
3 RICE, David (GBR)
4 WARD, Alexander (GBR)
5 WILLIS, Marcus (GBR)
6 Wild card Play-off place
7 Wild card Play-off place
8 To be announced
9 To be announced

 

QUALIFYING LADIES SINGLES
1 BOULTER, Katie (GBR)
2 DUNNE, Katy (GBR)
3 WINDLEY, Jade (GBR)
4 Wild card Play-off place
5 Wild card Play-off place
6 To be announced
7 To be announced
8 To be announced



-- Edited by Jaffa on Wednesday 11th of June 2014 09:35:30 AM

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2417
Date:

Not too many surprises above I don't think, apologies if it was posted in the wrong place, feel free to move this steven!

Only one for me was that I was surprised Alex Ward got one considering he hasn't played any of the grass court season... saying that, I think the man does possess a lot of potential to spring an upset - he's under ranked at the moment in my opinion.


__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55042
Date:

Thanks for that, Jaffa !

As you say, pretty uncontroversial - very much rankings-based

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2417
Date:

Must admit I did think they'd give one to Katy Dunne but I think it's the right decision not to.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55042
Date:

Jaffa wrote:

Must admit I did think they'd give one to Katy Dunne but I think it's the right decision not to.


 

I'd be curious to know, over time, how much difference it makes.

I mean, the French federation gave 17 year-old Fiona Ferro (ranked about 420) a MD WC this year.

Not saying that's right or wrong but, just wondering, if one looked back at similar players, does it make a difference? Does it impact their career (for good of bad)?

I think I'd have given Katy a MD wildcard but that's an 'off-the-cuff' thing, I'm not sure it'd have been the right decision - would be interested to know the stats or coaches' feedback from those top young players who have, or haven't received one. I'm guessing that it doesn't really make any difference over the long-term . . . .

 



__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2417
Date:

No I don't think it makes much of a difference either, all about playing matches at this stage. At least she's ggot more of a chance of playing a few more by attempting to qualify.



__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2558
Date:

The only one I would question is the Ward/Evans doubles one. I am pleased for them as Brits but, always feel its a slap in the face for those trying to make a go of doubles that I presume it would mean even more to? There are three other good pairings, and four more cards to give out so it may all not be lost yet.

__________________

 Its really not as bad as they say :)



Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 40604
Date:

Yes, very much as expected, though I did think most of it was pretty clear.

Men's singles : I am pleased that they have gone over the normal max total of 8 LTA recommendations so that all of the fairly clear GB top 11 have got something ( however that has been arrived at between the LTA and Wimbledon ). Wasn't sure about Alex Ward, really just based on his schedule, otherwise fair he is in the mix with the other Q WCs.

Women's singles : A bit surprised that Emily didn't get a Q WC, still being, if only just, a GB top 8 player and liking grass, but her results haven't been great. Of course, what Katy D was awarded was waited on with interest. I wouldn't have had her near a MD WC until recent events, and while I normally prefer to look longer term than a few results, such has been these results and performances that I feel she had made a strong case. Pity she now has more limited time to get fit again, although I guess that could never really be an influence ( unless it was maybe a very marginal choice ? )

Men's doubles : Pretty much as expected. The only thought I had is that for me Smethurst / Corrie, Willis / Burton and Rice / Thornley should all get at least Q WCs and such is the limited nature of doubles qualifying, I wondered whether one of these pairs ( probably Smethurst / Corrie ) would get a MD WC in spite of not having a CR below 400.

Women's doubles : Pretty much as expected. I'd hope for a Q WC for Murray / Windley ( I am presuming there is some qualifying here ). Their ranking has dropped, but there have been injury issues. And I'd love to see the recently partnering Webley--Smith and Slater get Women's Q WC, because, err, mainly because I like them !

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55042
Date:

Murray and Windley have a doubles qualifying place. One other wildcard spot there to be given out. The two men's wilcard doubles qualifying spots haven't been attributed yet.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 40604
Date:

Oh, so there are two men's doubles Q WC spaces. 3 into 2 doesn't go.

For me, Smethurst / Corrie and Willis / Burton would definitely be the two. But still would be a bit tough on Rice / Thornley.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55042
Date:

indiana wrote:

Oh, so there are two men's doubles Q WC spaces. 3 into 2 doesn't go.

For me, Smethurst / Corrie and Willis / Burton would definitely be the two. But still would be a bit tough on Rice / Thornley.


 

As they've got 4 wildcard main draw doubles slots still left to hand out, maybe they could give one of those to one of the teams above ?



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 40604
Date:

Yes, CD, I speculated on one pair getting a MD WC in my longer post if, as it seems is the case, there was a Q WC limit.

Seems sensible to me and Smethurst / Corrie have a CR of 418, so not that far over the CR 400 target.

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2432
Date:

Could Colin and Ross not have used a PR to get in, or have they already reached their limit for the year (surely not?) Maybe there is a limit of 1 or 2 per Grand Slam?

Would think that Jamie D / Muller are in line for one of the remaining Doubles WCs, especially if they go deep at Nottingham.

__________________
1 2 3 4  >  Last»  | Page of 4  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard