(i) Supporting Andy, who is British but very clearly - if given the choice - would rescind British nationality and adopt a different one, namely Scottish.
(ii) Supporting Bedene who is Slovenian but very clearly - if given the choice - would rescind Slovenian nationality and adopt a different one, namely British.
Not the same but poses questions - one could argue in favour of either as being 'better' or 'more British'.
Personally, I don't care - the world is a smaller place now, boundaries are increasingly 'soft', having lived about half my life abroad I know that one can easily have affinities and kinship to more than one nation. As far as I'm concerned, if they're British (and a 'good egg'!) I'll support them.
And it most certainly doesn't fall into the Zola Budd controversy (which is where I draw the line!).
And as to possible financial incentives, as mention by Phil, well - good ! If a federation has paid Bedene (either the Slovenian to play there or, indeed, the UK to play here) then fine - it's probably one of the reasons he's managed to continue to play and be successful - federations SHOULD fund their most promising players.
Indeed, my opinion is that Liam was basically guaranteed a Wimbledon WC when he agreed to sacrifice going to the French Challenger and be a Davis Cup reservist. And I thoroughly support him. I'm not sure he would have - or even could have afforded to - pass by the potential money and points of the Chally if there wasn't a quid pro quo. So it's not really any different.
It has often been said that the players should treat themselves and their careers more like little businesses. In the current LTA environment, they can't afford not to. And that might be for the better.
I continue to think it's a poor analogy, Eddie and CD. As CD says, not the same, I say pretty different. Nor indeed is one necessarily "better or "more British".
Different, because Aljaz is taking up citizenship of a country other than where he was born and bred in, whereas Andy most certainly wants to be a citizen of where he was born and bred in and feels a particular afinity to the more licalised part, Scotland, where he hails from and was seeking independence.
All us Scots had many issues that did or could enter our own individual choices, and I am sorr, but the taking up of citizenship in another cointry away from where you were born and raised and supporting independence for a constituent part within a country ARE to be me very different scenarios, however much one wants to play with words to try and make out otherwise.
Anyway, it makes sense to me and I am running out of ways to make essentially the same point.
Another couple of points :
Eddie, I agree with you that we are better off together. That is why I personally was a big supporter in spirit of the "Better Off Together" canpaign, if circumstances had allowed would have more actively supported it, and I most certainly voted NO. But I respect the great majority of my fellow Scots who voted YES ( there were some to my mind rather loopy reasons for voting YES, but no doubt some for NO too ).
Also, Phil may have been 'tongue in cheek'. Maybe he was also tongue in cheek about saying Glasgow should have been less of a consideration for hosting the Davis Cup tie vs the USA, because 45% of Scots voted not to be British ( which was anyway the wrong emphasis, since it was rather voted in favour of independence ). Sorry, Phil, if I misinterpret such nonsense, you say it with the forum equivalent of such a straight face. Anyway I hope Andy and the Glasgow crowd didn't let folk down in the tie, both seemed reasonably up for it :)
As for Aljaz, as I have said, I certainly could understand his case for citizenship, so that's absolutely fine with me. And once he is a citizen, he to me should fully be part of the consideration for being a member of the Davis Cup team - just pick the most likely team to win.
I continue to think it's a poor analogy, Eddie and CD. As CD says, not the same, I say pretty different. Nor indeed is one necessarily "better or "more British".
Different, because Aljaz is taking up citizenship of a country other than where he was born and bred in, whereas Andy most certainly wants to be a citizen of where he was born and bred in and feels a particular afinity to the more licalised part, Scotland, where he hails from and was seeking independence.
All us Scots had many issues that did or could enter our own individual choices, and I am sorr, but the taking up of citizenship in another cointry away from where you were born and raised and supporting independence for a constituent part within a country ARE to be me very different scenarios, however much one wants to play with words to try and make out otherwise.
Anyway, it makes sense to me and I am running out of ways to make essentially the same point.
Another couple of points :
Eddie, I agree with you that we are better off together. That is why I personally was a big supporter in spirit of the "Better Off Together" canpaign, if circumstances had allowed would have more actively supported it, and I most certainly voted NO. But I respect the great majority of my fellow Scots who voted YES ( there were some to my mind rather loopy reasons for voting YES, but no doubt some for NO too ).
Also, Phil may have been 'tongue in cheek'. Maybe he was also tongue in cheek about saying Glasgow should have been less of a consideration for hosting the Davis Cup tie vs the USA, because 45% of Scots voted not to be British ( which was anyway the wrong emphasis, since it was rather voted in favour of independence ). Sorry, Phil, if I misinterpret such nonsense, you say it with the forum equivalent of such a straight face. Anyway I hope Andy and the Glasgow crowd didn't let folk down in the tie, both seemed reasonably up for it :)
As for Aljaz, as I have said, I certainly could understand his case for citizenship, so that's absolutely fine with me. And once he is a citizen, he to me should fully be part of the consideration for being a member of the Davis Cup team - just pick the most likely team to win.
Tongue in cheek Indy ! Sometimes its difficult to express typed words in the way you want them to be understood. Originally I was against the DC venue being in Scotland, but mainly because Glasgow had hosted so many previous ties. But having been there I 100% take it back, the Scots provided an unreal atmosphere, plus it was only a 2hr car drive, so all good.
The things I heard over many months related to independence, I sometimes just got into just another "WHAT?!" And some folk definitely were ( trying to be ) serious, so it at times becomes difficult for my poor mind to cope. Sorry.
Anyway, I'll leave things here for now since, as I indicated, more generally I'd just be repeating myself.
Somehow I don't think the Scots independence issue is going away and the corollary issue of a separation in our Davis Cup team may well come round again at some point. I think the genie is well out the bottle now, what with Sturgeon and Salmond on the rampage, a situation partially created and worsened in my view, by the supine way in which UK politicians caved in to "Scottish" demands for high taxation and welfare spending largely funded by English taxpayers. They ought to have kept their mouths shut and let Scottish voters think and decide for themselves.
I am sure Scottish independence will not actually come to a vote again for many years, and is off the cards regarding current players.
The SNP seem to be evolving new meanings for the word 'generation' after Alex Salmond had very clearly stated pre-poll that it was an opportunity that we would not get again for another generation, but we are still talking many years.
So re Davis / Fed Cup and GB tennis generally that can be parked for now and we can move on ...
Well I guess it's official now. There are some pictures on twitter of Aljaz signing documents during his citizenship ceremony. And a nice touch from Liam sending him a "welcome to GB" tweet.
Edit:
One closer to our 20 in the Top 500 target. Now who else can we recruit
-- Edited by Bob in Spain on Tuesday 31st of March 2015 12:32:33 PM
Well I guess it's official now. There are some pictures on twitter of Aljaz signing documents during his citizenship ceremony. And a nice touch from Liam sending him a "welcome to GB" tweet.
Edit:
One closer to our 20 in the Top 500 target. Now who else can we recruit
-- Edited by Bob in Spain on Tuesday 31st of March 2015 12:32:33 PM
Welcome Mr Bedene, the more he gains support from other British players the better, he will also hopefully take some weight off our other potential 100 players. You never know in 12 months time he might become my favourite GB player ;)
-- Edited by philwrig on Tuesday 31st of March 2015 02:49:21 PM
Welcome Mr Bedene, the more he gains support from other British players the better, he will also hopefully take some weight off our other potential 100 players. You never know in 12 months time he might become my favourite GB player ;)
-- Edited by philwrig on Tuesday 31st of March 2015 02:49:21 PM
So GB finally has 2 players in the top 100, well for 6 days at least. Next Monday, Aljaz will drop out of the top 100 although I am sure this will only be temporary.
I am also sure that someone is going to tell me that until he has processed his citizenship papers with the ITF/ATP, he is technically still playing for Slovenia.
So GB finally has 2 players in the top 100, well for 6 days at least. Next Monday, Aljaz will drop out of the top 100 although I am sure this will only be temporary.
I am also sure that someone is going to tell me that until he has processed his citizenship papers with the ITF/ATP, he is technically still playing for Slovenia.
Hate to point this out Bob, but until the paperwork has actually gone through technically he's still Slovenian.
If he attended a citizenship ceremony, the paperwork must have gone through. I've attended a few of them - the chorus I used to sing in supplied the entertainment at them. I'm pretty sure they wouldn't stand there swearing allegiance to the Queen if the paperwork wasn't all in order.