I don't really understand college tennis but interesting to see the new college individual championship play-off which will take place this year and gives two 2015 US MD wildcards to the men's and women's winners IF AND ONLY IF the man is ranked in the the top 250 and the woman in the top 150, at the cut-off date.
If outside that ranking, they will get 2015 US Open Quali WCs.
It shows, if nothing else, that the LTA's WR 250 is agreed upon as a decent cut-off (for the men, at least).
Ps On a different subject, and for those who dislike subjective choices, there's currently MUCH muttering and outright complaints about Mika Llodra being given the French wildcard into the US Open - there are a whole load of blokes ranked better than him.
Hmm, interesting the top 250 / top 150 divergence between men and women. Now, I know there are arguments that can be put as to how competitive a WR 250 woman is relative to a WR 250 man, and I make no particular call on that. Just a bit surprised that that one got through.
I don't know who is complaining about Llodra, but it should only be other French guys - it's the reciprocal wild card that he gets, so it is only another Frenchman he displaces. I think it is mainly a "pity" card as I believe he is thinking of retiring.
I don't know who is complaining about Llodra, but it should only be other French guys - it's the reciprocal wild card that he gets, so it is only another Frenchman he displaces. I think it is mainly a "pity" card as I believe he is thinking of retiring.
Yes, as you say, the French and the US have their reciprocal arrangement. So a french WC is guaranteed.
But most of the French are furious (not just the actual players who have maybe been overlooked) that Llodra was chosen.
And there are quite a lot of replies/messages from other nationalities also saying it's a disgrace.
A Roland Garros WC is seen as justifiable, if you're going to retire - a chance to have say your goodbyes, if you will, at your home tournament.
But no one understands blatant preferential treatment at the US open, when so many younger players are trying to make a go of things, need points, need pay cheques AND are ranked well higher than Mika anyway !
Just to note the first-round victories from the two winners of the USTA's national playoff, which seems to involve regional and then national tournaments, whose ultimate winners (one man, one woman) get WCs into qualies. Both then lost in the next round (though Singh's match was very, very close) - but it looks like a good way to do a WC into a home slam. Open, so that anyone can play, but rigorous enough that winners can actually be competitive. And, since it's open to any member of the national association, not limited to home country players (if the national association permits non-home-country members).
Just to note the first-round victories from the two winners of the USTA's national playoff, which seems to involve regional and then national tournaments, whose ultimate winners (one man, one woman) get WCs into qualies. Both then lost in the next round (though Singh's match was very, very close) - but it looks like a good way to do a WC into a home slam. Open, so that anyone can play, but rigorous enough that winners can actually be competitive. And, since it's open to any member of the national association, not limited to home country players (if the national association permits non-home-country members).
Similar to how Emily and Gabi won pre-qualies and then won their first matches at Wimbledon Qualifying.
PaulM wrote: Similar to how Emily and Gabi won pre-qualies and then won their first matches at Wimbledon Qualifying.
Exactly ... but with the added bonus that it's not just the top players (including one who already met the standards for a QWC anyway!) playing. We know that those QWC playoffs exist and they engage us but I doubt they really engage people across the country. But if, as Indy says, you could have a "Road to Wimbledon" which meant that any LTA member could have a go at getting into a regional tournament ... and then as you say, the regionals could feed players into an expanded version of the national playoffs, it might catch the imagination and inspire far more interest in tennis in general.
PaulM wrote: Similar to how Emily and Gabi won pre-qualies and then won their first matches at Wimbledon Qualifying.
Exactly ... but with the added bonus that it's not just the top players (including one who already met the standards for a QWC anyway!) playing. We know that those QWC playoffs exist and they engage us but I doubt they really engage people across the country. But if, as Indy says, you could have a "Road to Wimbledon" which meant that any LTA member could have a go at getting into a regional tournament ... and then as you say, the regionals could feed players into an expanded version of the national playoffs, it might catch the imagination and inspire far more interest in tennis in general.
I think that's an excellent idea.
Especially as (and as alluded to in a junior thread) I don't believe the UK has national championships for regular players ? Does it ? Unlike France and other European countries where there are county, regional and national championships for all, by category i.e. all the unranked and LTA 10 players, all the LTA 9 and 8 players, etc. etc. (As well as age categories for over 35s).
SO there's nothing national for the competitive individual apart from the very, very top players ?
So, given how Wimbledon obsessed the country is, a 'Road to Wimbledon', open to all, starting at country level, would be a brilliant idea !!!!!!! the local media would love it.
To get more youngsters into the sport (emphasis on sport, not leisure), you need more adults - kids follow their parents, and older siblings. It's all a numbers game.
I can see what you are all saying about the WCs being given to players for Wimbledon - but for the players themselves it not only helps to fund them for a year, but gives them that opportunity to have a shot at 'making it'.
We have the tournament in Britain so surely it makes sense to give the opportunities that are available to British players who are just outside of being up there in the mix? The Americans, Australians and French certainly give their WCs to players from their nation.
Much as I personally would virtually do away with Slam main draw WCs, as long as they exist in the other Slams and are given mostly to home players, Wimbledon should do likewise. It is something that should be universally considered for these elite tournaments.
But anyway, it won't be, so I and some others can whistle in the wind as much as we want, these passes will continue to be given.