Week 10 - Canada F1 ($15,000) - Gatineau (Hard)

steven · Tennis legend

RE: Week 10 - Canada F1 ($15,000) - Gatineau (Hard)

Ben W · Social player

Steven, I feel your amazing attention to detail is epitomised by your addition of Hugo di Feo's career high in the previous results post!!

biggrin

-- Edited by Ben W on Wednesday 5th of March 2014 10:12:12 PM

The Optimist · ATP qualifying

What a pity Dan the Man lost, I really wanted him to get a point after such a good qualifying run. Hope it won't be too long before he gets on the board.

steven · Tennis legend

Ben W wrote:
Steven, I feel your amazing attention to detail is epitomised by your addition of Hugo di Feo's career high in the previous results post!!

I know it looks a bit silly (though it's slightly faster to write than "just off his career high" or similar) but the reason it's there is because I check career highs when each opponent is known at the same time as checking H2Hs. I found that if I left out the ones like this, then when I came back to my list of matches and saw there was no CH there, I tended to assume I simply hadn't looked it up and so looked it up again. Thus, recording it and not making a decision each time I paste results in about whether to delete it to avoid looking (even) silly(er) actually saves time overall. So that's my excuse and I'm sticking to it wink

Stircrazy · Tennis legend

R1: (1) Ed Corrie & Dan Smethurst CR581 (317+264) defeated (ALT) Phenyo Matong & Jordan Sweeney (BOT/CAN) UNR by 1 & 3
R1: (2) Hugo di Feo (CAN) & Richard Gabb CR 868 (545+323) defeated Adam El Mihdawy & Nikita Kryvonos (USA/USA) CR 1664 (466+1198) by 3-6 6-1 [10-5]

*****

QF: (1) Ed Corrie & Dan Smethurst CR581 (317+264) vs Eric Quigley & Fritz Wolmarans (USA/RSA) UNR
QF: Kamil Pajkowski Filip Peliwo (CAN/CAN) UNR vs (2) Hugo di Feo (CAN) & Richard Gabb CR 868 (545+323)

Spectator · All-time great

The supposedly UNR pairing faced by the 1st seeds does not look at all like an UNR pairing! Good work to all thus far - best for the matches to come.

Stircrazy · Tennis legend

Spectator wrote:
The supposedly UNR pairing faced by the 1st seeds does not look at all like an UNR pairing! Good work to all thus far - best for the matches to come.

Spectator: "unranked" because Wolmarans, according to the ATP, currently has no doubles ranking, though he has a CH of 412 from July 2011; Quigley's is 1023. wink It was so late when I posted the results that I couldn't be bothered to spend an extra minute or so checking & allowed myself to be guided solely by the draw sheet.

Spectator · All-time great

I wasn't commenting on your material, Stircrazy ... just amused by their being designated as UNR. Actually quite surprised that their CHs are so relatively low (NB: Quigley's CH is 870) - tend to think of both of them as better than that.