Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 46 - ITF ($10K) - Manchester, UK Hard


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 52582
Date:
RE: Week 46 - ITF ($10K) - Manchester, UK Hard


Grace Dixon lost 7-5 6-0

Katy 6-4 4-2 up against Izzy

Lucy has served for the set twice only to go into a TB - which she then loses !

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 52582
Date:

The most frustrating match from Lucy. Would be really interested to hear from those who were courtside . . . . .

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 34280
Date:

Away from here for a few hours and come back to find another reason to cringe and think "what have I done wrong now" noconfuse Anyway, I'll pretend I didn't see that! Btw, I think if she read this thread, my gf would be more worried about who I might be married to (re. Paul's post) than anywhere I might be 'the talk of' LOL

Seriously, thanks for the reports, both - they certainly add a bit of much-needed context to the results.

 



-- Edited by steven on Wednesday 13th of November 2013 11:06:31 PM

__________________

GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!

GB top 25s (ranks, whereabouts) & stats - http://www.britishtennis.net/stats.html



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 34280
Date:

The Brits are 2-7 so far:

L32: (LL) Grace Dixon UNR lost to (Q) Carla Touly (FRA) WR 1204 (CH 1203 last week) by 5 & 0
L32: Nicole Peterson UNR lost to (8) Michaela Frlicka (GER) WR 692 (CH 611 in Sep) by 1 & 2
L32: Harriet Dart WR 1014 lost to (4) Klaartje Liebens (BEL) WR 586 (CH 583 last week) by 3 & 3
L32: (WC) Freya Christie UNR beat (7) Nikola Vajdová (SVK) WR 753 (CH 474 in 2008) by 5 & 4
L32: Katy Dunne WR 731 beat (WC) Isabelle Wallace UNR by 4 & 3
L32: (3) Lucy Brown WR 584 lost to Natalia Vajdová (SVK) WR 1018 (CH 879 in Sep) by 7-6(5) 6-4
L32: (WC) Maia Lumsden UNR lost to (Q) Nora Niedmers (GER) UNR by 5 & 3
L32: (WC) Jasmine Amber Asghar UNR lost to (2) Eva Wacanno (NED) WR 531 (= CH) by 7-6(2) 6-2

Funnily enough, 4 of the 5 non-GB qualifiers have played so far ... and all of them won!


__________________

GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!

GB top 25s (ranks, whereabouts) & stats - http://www.britishtennis.net/stats.html



All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

Katy Dunne WR 731 d (WC) Isabelle Wallace UNR 6-4. 6-3
(3) Lucy Brown WR 584 lost to Natalia Vajdová (SVK) WR 1018 (CH 879 in Sep) 6(5)-7, 4-6

Ms Craven and Ms Drew currently 6-2. 6-7. 3-2 on serve


__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 34280
Date:

14 breaks in the Jazzamay v Georgia match - they are now in a final set tiebreak.

Anna had a surprising amount of difficulty putting away the 1st set against Yuriko, whom she thrashed 1 & 1 in Barnstaple last month, but has just edged the tiebreak 11-9!

__________________

GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!

GB top 25s (ranks, whereabouts) & stats - http://www.britishtennis.net/stats.html



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10085
Date:

Rough when our better young girls get the tougher draws, but Jasmine will be disappointed to throw away the first set.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 52582
Date:

Great reports Priesty - love to read them.

Lucy is a truly frustrating player, real shame, but glad to hear that some of the youngsters impressed you, even if they haven't quite got the whole package yet which is only to be expected really.

Thanks again.

__________________


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9477
Date:

Cheers for the reports Priesty.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17172
Date:

Katie's match finished at 6.40, so I've not been home that long and Katy and Harriet we still finishing their doubles when I left the venue.

Priesty has summed most of it up, but i'll give you my report a little later.

However the best match was the last match on court between Katie and the top seed, which was a really quality match.

Oh - and I had a very interesting discussion with Katy Dunne regarding Steven. Apparently Steven is the talk of the girl's locker room. I'll reveal the full conversation later, I hope Katy will not mind.....

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10085
Date:

Ooooh-er. Hope Stevens wife doesn't get jealous of his celebrity status.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17172
Date:

A few thoughts from today:

Court conditions weren't great, it was freezing and the courts were very slow, which lead to some very long rallies. Nice set up, with 6 indoor courts - 3 on each side of the walkway. There was so much going on at times it was quite hard to keep an eye on everything.

Didn't arrive until just after 12, so missed the first set of games.

Watched a bit of the Grace Dixon match and she played very well in patches. She was broken serving for the tie break in the first set and she was hitting a lot of winners. I can see why she took out a seed at Barnstaple. The scoreline was deceptive as the match was much closer.
Didn't watch too much of Katy v Isabelle, but once Katy won the first set she dominated the match. Isabelle has a good lefty serve and solid ground strokes, but not quite as mobile as Katy.
Lucy Brown is an enigma. This is the second time I have seen her (Wrexham 25K)and she has played very similarly in both games. She takes early leads, but doesn't go and dominate her opponent and finish out the game. Lucy's backhand is excellent and dominated the match, but her forehand was error stricken and needs some work. Lucy should have won that game in straight sets, but she never looked comfortable when she went in front.
Harriet was unlucky to come up against an in form player. There was very little between the two players in reality, but Harriet took umbridge to some line calls and decided the umpire was a joke and was constantly muttering about calls rather than focusing on tennis. This was at a crucial stage in the first set. She is a nice player, has a lot more guile than most at that age and played some lovely backhand drop shots from behind her baseline.
Jazzamay v Georgia went on for hours and was full of very long rallies. Jazzamay should really have won the match, having numerous chances to finish off the match. Georgia hits the ball hard, but she is very tall and her footwork needs work as she can be made to look ungamely at times. She now has two counters and will get a ranking shortly. Jazzamay will win games at this level going forward.
Anna S made heavy weather of the first set, breaking several times, but getting broken straight back, but ran away with the second set. Miyazaki was better than I expected and had some nice deft touches.
Didn't see to much of Anna F v Charlotte as I was watching Katie's match and this game was behind me. Anna seemingly won quite easily, but the bits that I saw were error strewn and I was a little disappointed with Anna to be honest. Charlotte was OK, but she was stepping up a level as she hasn't made many first round draws.
The best match of the day in terms of quality was Katie B, with the entourage of LTA coaches watching(Jeremy Bates, Alan Jones(?), Martin Lee(?)) watching. It was obvious to see why Hoffman was top seed and has a ranking in the 300's. She has a very big serve and a strong baseline game. Katie started slowly getting broken early on and having to up the gears on serve in the first set when she was facing break points(quite regularly), which she did.
Once Katie managed to get on top of the big serve in the second set, she was the better player, holding serve much more comfortably and looking like breaking Hoffman's serve. She did serve for the set, but tightened and ended up winning the tie break comfortably, (Hoffman got a terrible call in the tie break). Unfortunately Hoffman upped her game in the final set and Katie started to make errors as fatigue set in.
Katie has a good serve, lovely ground shots and she moves her opponent round very well and she can hit winners all over the court. The one thing that was missing from the game was a touch of guile. I only remember one drop shot in the whole match. It won't be long before Katie is flying up the ranking and on a par with Hoffman.

As observed at Wrexham, ability wise there is not a lot of difference between a 600 ranking and a 1000 ranking, just the ability to string together winning points regularly(consistency) and to play the big points well.



__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1854
Date:

nice reports great info thanks to both for taking the time to share it all

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 53307
Date:

A pretty sparsely populated doubles draw, so lots of byes:

R1:  (1) Jos Rae & Anna Smith CR 744 (484+260) vs BYE
R1:  BYE vs BYE
R1:  (4) Harriet Dart & Katy Dunne CR 2166 (1013+1153) vs BYE
R1:  BYE vs Natalia Vajdova & Nikola Vajdova (SVK/SVK) UNR
R1:  Clémence Fayol & Carla Touly (FRA/FRA) UNR vs BYE
R1:  BYE vs (3) Eva Wacanno & Julia Wachaczyk (NED/GER) CR 1060 (319+741)
R1:  BYE vs BYE
R1:  BYE vs (2) Anna Fitzpatrick & Michaela Frlicka (GER) CR 1007 (419+588)

*****

QF:  (1) Jos Rae & Anna Smith CR 744 (484+260) vs BYE
QF:  Natalia Vajdova & Nikola Vajdova (SVK/SVK) UNR defeated (4) Harriet Dart & Katy Dunne CR 2166 (1013+1153) by 2 & 4 bleh
QF:  (3) Eva Wacanno & Julia Wachaczyk (NED/GER) CR 1060 (319+741) defeated Clémence Fayol & Carla Touly (FRA/FRA) UNR by 3 & 2
QF:  BYE vs (2) Anna Fitzpatrick & Michaela Frlicka (GER) CR 1007 (419+588)

*****

SF:  (1) Jos Rae & Anna Smith CR 744 (484+260) vs Natalia Vajdova & Nikola Vajdova (SVK/SVK) UNR
SF:  (3) Eva Wacanno & Julia Wachaczyk (NED/GER) CR 1060 (319+741) vs (2) Anna Fitzpatrick & Michaela Frlicka (GER) CR 1007 (419+588)



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

That's so sparsely populated it makes Exmoor look crowded. Would be very nice indeed to see a (1) v (2) final. And certainly both the top-seeded teams would be well-rested: if they did make the final, one would be guaranteed a tournament in which whatever team won had played a total of two matches ....

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5 6  >  Last»  | Page of 6  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard