Glad to see that Dave is preparing assiduously for his singles . . . (sitting with the group, watching Josh and texting . . . ). Well, given that Dave's approach is always that if there are three sets on offer, then you might as well use them all, not expecting a mega start (prove me wrong, fave. . . )
And, yes, Josh is still young enough and 'talented' enough to change his serve - he must know that, surely . . . he gets a fair amount of arm whip and wrist on it, and has quite a slice, but there's no power from his legs and body; I agree K, it's very much a club serve that's been honed to its max.
As a complete non player can I ask those more experienced than me, how hard is it to up and change a significant part of your game like the serve? I always thought it was pretty hard as the top guys and gals seem to only ever tweak things like serve action, racket grip, etc rather than make a full change. Is that just because there can't be anything too fundamentally wrong with their game for them to get to the top or is it, as I always assumed, because it's very difficult to change something that ingrained?
__________________
To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty
I'm a complete non player myself, but have often been rather sceptical about suggestions as to how such and such a player would be so much better if they 'just" changed / altered this or that, suspecting it may often be very much easier said than done.
However, Josh's serve really does perplex me. He's been an integral part of the system for many years from a young age, and a lot of time ( a heck of a lot of time I would hope ! ) must have been spent trying to improve that serve.
It's the one shot that you can have in theory total control of, with less outside variables, and from that aspect maybe more easily "taught" and then replicated. But, for a pro tennis player, it remains so bad...?!
Dave holds serve and it's 3*-1. But he did have a BP in the last game and it is, so far, a 'proper' match (unlike Josh's where the poor lad got hammered)
Mr Milton v Mr Young was a huge mismatch at this time: the result isn't really that surprising (unfortunately). Incidentally, we shouldn't be too upset at the havoc Mr Shane caused with GB players; I just looked over the main draw, and the current and former University of Virginia players are generally having a field day at home. Teddy Angelinos beat Alex Kuznetov; Mitchell Frank beat de Voest; and the only team member who lost (Styslinger) lost to a former teammate (Jenkins).
Well, there wasn't too much between them. Rice should be fairly happy about his performance this week and I think he'll qualify for the next Challenger, too.
I agree that Dave is good enough to be top 250, but in the near future he'll have to deal with a trade-off. I think he'll be top 100 in doubles fairly soon, but I'm not sure whether his singles progress can keep up with it.