Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Entries Week 44 - 28/10/2013


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10013
Date:
RE: Entries Week 44 - 28/10/2013


I think it's more likely that Coxy will play in Edgbaston. Particularly if he plans to go to Melbourne.



I checked the entry list for the two 10Ks in the US (the second of them is on Fitzy's schedule), and was pleasantly surprised to see that Eric Prodon is making another comeback. I've been a fan ever since 2007, when Prodon reached the finals of seven consecutive Futures and then seamlessly moved on to the Challenger level, where he then reached three consecutive finals, making it a total of ten consecutive finals.

__________________

  



All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

Just to be pedantic, Marray is defending 360, not 760, points, I think.

__________________


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9277
Date:

Spectator wrote:

Just to be pedantic, Marray is defending 360, not 760, points, I think.


 I think I'm right in saying that his ATP Masters points come off this week as well



__________________


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9277
Date:

Salmon wrote:

I think it's more likely that Coxy will play in Edgbaston. Particularly if he plans to go to Melbourne.



 


 Well obviously given how near Edgbaston is to Melbourne!! I really can't see him heading off to Aus for 1 week.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10013
Date:

Well, I'd rather spend a week playing at home if I'm just coming back to Europe from Australia. Either way, it's almost surely academical, because I don't think he is going to Melbourne.

__________________

  



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17369
Date:

I'm fairly sure Dan Cox will withdraw from Melbourne. There are 3 challengers in a row and he hasn't the other two. There is no way anyone would travel to the other end of the country for 1 week.

__________________
RJA


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9639
Date:

seagull wrote:
Spectator wrote:

Just to be pedantic, Marray is defending 360, not 760, points, I think.


 I think I'm right in saying that his ATP Masters points come off this week as well


Correct



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

Got it. Thank you!

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19388
Date:

My personal feeling is that Marcus has already exceeded expectation this year and after a 3 week stint in the heat of Kuwait, he may be a bit drained - hence the slightly surprising result this week.

I would have no problem if he decided to take a couple of weeks off and then dive head first into pre-season training, leaving the Challengers for next year.



-- Edited by Bob in Spain on Wednesday 16th of October 2013 03:37:25 PM

__________________


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9277
Date:

Paris Doubles Entry List

1 Peya, Alexander (AUT)/Soares, Bruno (BRA) 7
2 Granollers, Marcel (ESP)/Lopez, Marc (ESP) 13
3 Paes, Leander (IND)/Stepanek, Radek (CZE) 19
4 Dodig, Ivan (CRO)/Melo, Marcelo (BRA) 20
5 Bopanna, Rohan (IND)/Roger-Vasselin, Edouard (FRA) 27
6 Marrero, David (ESP)/Verdasco, Fernando (ESP) 28
7 Qureshi, Aisam-Ul-Haq (PAK)/Rojer, Jean-Julien (NED) 30
8 Benneteau, Julien (FRA)/Zimonjic, Nenad (SRB) 36
9 Fognini, Fabio (ITA)/Seppi, Andreas (ITA) 39
10 Fyrstenberg, Mariusz (POL)/Matkowski, Marcin (POL) 41
11 Chardy, Jeremy (FRA)/Simon, Gilles (FRA) 52
12 Mirnyi, Max (BLR)/Tecau, Horia (ROU) 52
13 Kubot, Lukasz (POL)/Lindstedt, Robert (SWE) 56
14 Fleming, Colin (GBR)/Marray, Jonathan (GBR) 57
15 Huey, Treat (PHI)/Inglot, Dominic (GBR) 57
16 Nestor, Daniel (CAN)/Pospisil, Vasek (CAN) 58
17 (OS)
18 (OS)
19 (OS)
20 (OS)
21 (OS)
22 (OS)
23 (WC)
24 (WC)

Alternates
1 Murray, Jamie (GBR)/Peers, John (AUS) 59
2 Llodra, Michael (FRA)/Mahut, Nicolas (FRA) 62
3 Gonzalez, Santiago (MEX)/Lipsky, Scott (USA) 67
4 Nieminen, Jarkko (FIN)/Tursunov, Dmitry (RUS) 80
5 Berlocq, Carlos (ARG)/Zeballos, Horacio (ARG) 82
6 Begemann, Andre (GER)/Emmrich, Martin (GER) 86
7 Cabal, Juan Sebastian (COL)/Farah, Robert (COL) 99
8 Kas, Christopher (GER)/Marach, Oliver (AUT) 103
9 Monroe, Nicholas (USA)/Stadler, Simon (GER) 122
10 Skupski, Ken (GBR)/Skupski, Neal (GBR) 198



__________________


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9277
Date:

Milton and Pauffley have withdrawn from Edgbaston presumably to play challengers (which would put us up to 14 in challengers this week!)

Meanwhile Coxy is sticking with his Greece pick

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4022
Date:

I'm abit confused about the dubs entries above. J/J are above our other two pairings in the race and it's almost end of year, so how come they are ranked lower?

__________________

Face your fears........Live your dreams!



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 34418
Date:

Helen40 wrote:

I'm abit confused about the dubs entries above. J/J are above our other two pairings in the race and it's almost end of year, so how come they are ranked lower?


The ranking for entry purposes is obtained by adding the individual doubles rankings of the two players in the team. Colin, for example, is the top Brit in the individual doubles rankings but only about half of his points were scored with Jonny, so he and Jonny are behind Jamie and John in the Race but ahead of them when you combine the individual rankings of each player in the team.

Had Colin scored all of his points with the same player, he would easily be top 8 in the Race now. Instead, he appears 5 times in the top 100 of the Race with 5 different partners.



__________________

GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!

GB top 25s (ranks, whereabouts) & stats - http://www.britishtennis.net/stats.html



Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4022
Date:

steven wrote:
Helen40 wrote:

I'm abit confused about the dubs entries above. J/J are above our other two pairings in the race and it's almost end of year, so how come they are ranked lower?


The ranking for entry purposes is obtained by adding the individual doubles rankings of the two players in the team. Colin, for example, is the top Brit in the individual doubles rankings but only about half of his points were scored with Jonny, so he and Jonny are behind Jamie and John in the Race but ahead of them when you combine the individual rankings of each player in the team.

Had Colin scored all of his points with the same player, he would easily be top 8 in the Race now. Instead, he appears 5 times in the top 100 of the Race with 5 different partners.


 Thanks steven, mystery cleared up. I get very confused with seedings/entries especially around GSs where I recall the rules are different again?



__________________

Face your fears........Live your dreams!



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17369
Date:

Edgbaston is looking quite weak(GB wise) given all the defectors. Suprised Marcus is not having a go at challengers yet.

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4  >  Last»  | Page of 4  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard