I know that Dan Cox has no points to defend for the next 5 months. But at approximate WR 260 is he yet really secure for getting an Aussie Open qualies spot ? I would be less concerned about draws once that was secured.
I know that Steven recently gave some details of recent cut offs, which I can't find and I believe also mentioned some travel subsidy for players that could make more turn up and hence lower the cut off.
I know that Dan Cox has no points to defend for the next 5 months. But at approximate WR 260 is he yet really secure for getting an Aussie Open qualies spot ? I would be less concerned about draws once that was secured.
I know that Steven recently gave some details of recent cut offs, which I can't find and I believe also mentioned some travel subsidy for players that could make more turn up and hence lower the cut off.
260 will be fine. Lots of players on or around the cut don't travel to Australia. This year the final cut dropped to around 300.
I know that Dan Cox has no points to defend for the next 5 months. But at approximate WR 260 is he yet really secure for getting an Aussie Open qualies spot ? I would be less concerned about draws once that was secured.
I know that Steven recently gave some details of recent cut offs, which I can't find and I believe also mentioned some travel subsidy for players that could make more turn up and hence lower the cut off.
260 will be fine. Lots of players on or around the cut don't travel to Australia. This year the final cut dropped to around 300.
This year, the initial AO qualifying cut was 247 and it ended up going out to 304. If I remember right, that's fairly normal, though the cut usually only goes out to the 260s/270s until very shortly before the draw, when players who haven't made the trip tend to withdraw en masse and players around the 300 level can sometimes get in if a late space opens up.
The travel subsidy of £1000 was brought in this year but not announced (at least not to the world in general) until it was too late to make a difference to players' decisions. It might mean that some players who have missed playing qualies in the past decide to have a go next year but I doubt it will make a huge difference.
Josh is now 6-2 *2-3 - it would be a good win (and somewhat unexpected, given recent form, even though they are quite close in the rankings) if he can do it.
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
Cox will be fine as things stand, I'm fairly confident of that. But in any case, he has 8 more weeks to play Challengers and Tour events (where he should pick up some points) and if he still has the appetite, he can enter some Futures in the Canary Islands to pick up some points.
But I'll not be negative. He'll beat Kudla and seal the deal.
Things didn't get any better for Ed & Dan S in the doubles qualies:
Q1: (WC) Erik Elliott & Matt Seeberger (USA/USA) CR 1760 defeated (q2) Ed Corrie & Dan Smethurst CR 1186 by 2 & 5
****
Main draw:
R1: Steve Johnson & Tim Smyczek (USA/USA) CR 373 vs Marcelo Arevalo (ESA) & Dan Cox CR 1613 R1: Rajeev Ram & Bobby Reynolds (USA/USA) CR 358 vs Dan Evans & Nick Kyrgios (AUS) CR 1182
Very good win for Mr Milton - didn't expect that. Lousy FQR draw, though. Indeed, remaining draws overall couldn't have been much worse.
Why would playing someone ranked about 600 in the FQR of a $100k Challenger be a lousy draw? It's about as good as it gets for a North Amercian or Western European Challenger.
Excellent results so far for Josh M since he has gone to the States. You have to remember that Josh is a 500+ ranked player playing in a 100K challenger so all matches will be tough. The South African has a pedigree though and i'm not sure of the reason for the ranking drop, but don't expect Josh to win this match.
If Dan E gets past Williams the draw really opens up and there is very little to frighten him. Here's hoping for a good week.