Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Actual GB top 10 men.


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2012
Date:
Actual GB top 10 men.


I was just thinking how nice it is that at the moment there seems to be a big group of British men who seem capable of mixing it at Challenger level.

Of course it's what the rankings show that counts, but I was just wondering how others would expect to see a year end top 10 if everybody was playing at a similar range of tournaments, and had injury free years?

Of course this is going to be very subjective but i'll kick off:

 

1) Murray - Just about sneaks gb number 1!

2) Evans - I think most would agree that after his US run, if he can maintain that level of play he is firmly British number 2.

3) J Ward - has bad luck with injuries but I think still sneaks Edmund, and is a threat in challengers.

4) K Edmund - What a great prospect.

5) A Ward  - really having a very good run of form, firmly established himself as a challenger player in my eyes

6) Boggo  - Hasn't played much of late but can still cause upsets at challenger level

7) Cox - difficult to know where to put Cox until after he has had a good go at challengers

8) Rice - seems to be consistently qualifying at challengers, hopefully he sticks at it and has a breakthrough like a-ward

9) Golding - again bad luck with injuries but I feel he is probably in limbo between futures and challengers when healthy

10) Corrie/Hewitt - similar to Rice both players seem to perform well at futures, will be fascinating to see how they get on in challengers (I'm going to ignore Hewitt's loss in qr1 this week!)



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40602
Date:

1. Murray
2. Evans
3. Bogdanovic
4. J Ward
5. Edmund
6. A Ward
7. Golding
8. Klein
9. Rice
10. Cox

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4586
Date:

1. Murray
2. Evans
3. Edmund
4. J. Ward
5. Bogdanovic
6. A. Ward
7. Rice
8. Cox
9. Klein
10.Hewitt

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17369
Date:

1. Murray
2. Evans
3. J Ward
4. Edmund
5. A Ward
6. Golding
7. Inglot
8. Cox
9. Rice
10. Corrie

__________________


Top national player

Status: Offline
Posts: 3413
Date:

1. Rob Dee
2. Jamie Murray
3. Tim Henman
4. Andrew Castle
5. Me
6. Fred Perry
7. Sue Barker
8. James Keothavong
9. Guy I saw buying a racquet in JJB this morning
10. Greg Howe



__________________

Of all tyrannies a tyranny exercised for the good of its victim may be the most oppressive....  those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience



Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 523
Date:

john wrote:

1. Rob Dee
2. Jamie Murray
3. Tim Henman
4. Andrew Castle
5. Me
6. Fred Perry
7. Sue Barker
8. James Keothavong
9. Guy I saw buying a racquet in JJB this morning
10. Greg Howe


surly you fancy yourself as number 1?



__________________


Top national player

Status: Offline
Posts: 3413
Date:

huntley93 wrote:
john wrote:

1. Rob Dee
2. Jamie Murray
3. Tim Henman
4. Andrew Castle
5. Me
6. Fred Perry
7. Sue Barker
8. James Keothavong
9. Guy I saw buying a racquet in JJB this morning
10. Greg Howe


surly you fancy yourself as number 1?


 I can't hold a candle to the legend of Robert Dee I'm afraid



__________________

Of all tyrannies a tyranny exercised for the good of its victim may be the most oppressive....  those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience



Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 364
Date:

john wrote:
huntley93 wrote:
john wrote:

1. Rob Dee
2. Jamie Murray
3. Tim Henman
4. Andrew Castle
5. Me
6. Fred Perry
7. Sue Barker
8. James Keothavong
9. Guy I saw buying a racquet in JJB this morning
10. Greg Howe


surly you fancy yourself as number 1?


 I can't hold a candle to the legend of Robert Dee I'm afraid


 Probably for the best as you would get sued.



__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 989
Date:

1. Muz
2. Ward
= Evans
4. Edmund
5. A. Ward
6. Bog
7. Cox
8. Klein
9. Rice
10. Hewitt

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55041
Date:

I'm a bit confused (easily done).

Is this a list to predict the top 10 for the year end ?

Or a list of how the top ten would look (hypothetically) if they were all fit, all playing the same tournaments etc. ?



__________________


Top national player

Status: Offline
Posts: 3413
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

I'm a bit confused (easily done).

Is this a list to predict the top 10 for the year end ?

Or a list of how the top ten would look (hypothetically) if they were all fit, all playing the same tournaments etc. ?


 The latter. Imagine all the GB guys toured together and played exactly the same tournaments, same level, same quantity etc. Who would be the best? So basically how do they rank purely on level of tennis, whereas sometimes the rankings can be skewed by injury, resources for travelling, bad scheduling, brave scheduling etc. etc.



__________________

Of all tyrannies a tyranny exercised for the good of its victim may be the most oppressive....  those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10013
Date:

Andy Murray
James Blake
Daniel Evans
Daniel Cox
Kyle Edmundo

__________________

  



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40602
Date:

Yes, very much the latter, i.e. from the OP I basically read it as how do you think this year end rankings would look if all the players were essentially fully fit for the year and played tournaments as John described.

For myself, I put Boggo higher ( still got it if he was just fit ) and Oli higher ( would rise better than many to a higher standard of tournament ). Kyle fifth for this year although longer term he will / would usurp at least Boggo and James.

I must admit I hadn't considered Dom Inglot. Doing so ( on limited evidence ) he ousts Dan Cox from my top 10.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17369
Date:

I'm sure there maust be a statistical way to rank them. Perhaps the average of the top 5 scalps they have beaten this season?

__________________


Top national player

Status: Offline
Posts: 3413
Date:

That doesn't measure consistency though, which surely has to still come into it.

Rather measure the average ranking of all players beaten and all players lost to and gauge some sort of level from that

__________________

Of all tyrannies a tyranny exercised for the good of its victim may be the most oppressive....  those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience

1 2  >  Last»  | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard